On Friday 25 March 2016 09:54:12 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> >> Is this documented in some wiki so we don't have to rely on people's
> >> memories
> >> or someone digging up the corresponding email thread?
> >
> > Good point. Any suggestion on where to document this?
>
> +1 since my gmail-search-foo was
CI versions has been raised as per this thread.
thanks,
Scarlett
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> >> Is this documented in some wiki so we don't have to rely on people's
> memories
> >> or someone digging up the corresponding email thread?
> >
> > Good
>> Is this documented in some wiki so we don't have to rely on people's memories
>> or someone digging up the corresponding email thread?
>
> Good point. Any suggestion on where to document this?
+1 since my gmail-search-foo was not up to the task - we have so many
threads regarding compiler and
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:37 AM, David Faure wrote:
> On Thursday 24 March 2016 23:14:36 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El diumenge, 20 de març de 2016, a les 10:12:14 CET, David Faure va
> escriure:
> > > On Friday 18 March 2016 20:16:05 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
>
On Thursday 24 March 2016 23:14:36 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El diumenge, 20 de març de 2016, a les 10:12:14 CET, David Faure va escriure:
> > On Friday 18 March 2016 20:16:05 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > IIRC, the last time we talked about this we decided (I'll try to find
> > >
El diumenge, 20 de març de 2016, a les 10:12:14 CET, David Faure va escriure:
> On Friday 18 March 2016 20:16:05 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > IIRC, the last time we talked about this we decided (I'll try to find
> > the e-mail thread when I get back home, IIRC the conclusion was by
> >
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> with todays release of Qt 5.6 I suggest that we raise the minimum Qt version
> requirement to 5.4. This would mean the latest three releases are supported.
>
> The important new features in Qt 5.4 in my
> > The important new features in Qt 5.4 in my opinion for frameworks
> > development
> > are:
> > * QSignalSpy(const QObject *object, PointerToMemberFunction signal)
> > * Q_LOGGING_CATEGORY(name, string, msgType)
>
> + QTimer::singleShot(timeout, receiver, PointerToMemberFunction)
> +
On Wednesday 16 March 2016 13:13:36 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> with todays release of Qt 5.6 I suggest that we raise the minimum Qt version
> requirement to 5.4. This would mean the latest three releases are supported.
>
> The important new features in Qt 5.4 in my opinion for
On Friday 18 March 2016 20:16:05 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> IIRC, the last time we talked about this we decided (I'll try to find
> the e-mail thread when I get back home, IIRC the conclusion was by
> dfaure) on KF5 always support the two last versions of Qt. This was
> decided so that we do
Hi all,
with todays release of Qt 5.6 I suggest that we raise the minimum Qt version
requirement to 5.4. This would mean the latest three releases are supported.
The important new features in Qt 5.4 in my opinion for frameworks development
are:
* QSignalSpy(const QObject *object,
Hi all,
IIRC, the last time we talked about this we decided (I'll try to find
the e-mail thread when I get back home, IIRC the conclusion was by
dfaure) on KF5 always support the two last versions of Qt. This was
decided so that we do not need to have threads like these every time
we want to
El dimecres, 16 de març de 2016, a les 13:13:36 CET, Martin Graesslin va
escriure:
> Hi all,
>
> with todays release of Qt 5.6 I suggest that we raise the minimum Qt version
> requirement to 5.4. This would mean the latest three releases are
> supported.
>
> The important new features in Qt 5.4
13 matches
Mail list logo