Re: Raising the requirement to Qt 5.6 ?

2017-02-02 Thread David Faure
On mercredi 1 février 2017 23:04:18 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dimecres, 1 de febrer de 2017, a les 14:16:35 CET, David Faure va escriure: > > On mardi 31 janvier 2017 01:25:58 CET Aleix Pol wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > >

Re: Raising the requirement to Qt 5.6 ?

2017-02-01 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dimecres, 1 de febrer de 2017, a les 14:16:35 CET, David Faure va escriure: > On mardi 31 janvier 2017 01:25:58 CET Aleix Pol wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > Now that Qt 5.8 is out, should we increase requirement to Qt 5.6 as the > > >

Re: Raising the requirement to Qt 5.6 ?

2017-02-01 Thread David Faure
On mardi 31 janvier 2017 01:25:58 CET Aleix Pol wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Now that Qt 5.8 is out, should we increase requirement to Qt 5.6 as the > > rules say? > > +1 > Let's! Yes, the good thing about generic rules is that we can

Re: Raising the requirement to Qt 5.6 ?

2017-01-30 Thread Aleix Pol
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Now that Qt 5.8 is out, should we increase requirement to Qt 5.6 as the rules > say? +1 Let's!

Raising the requirement to Qt 5.6 ?

2017-01-30 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Now that Qt 5.8 is out, should we increase requirement to Qt 5.6 as the rules say? Cheers, Albert