My opinion is still the same on this matter: VS2012 (aka MSVC11).
I guessed as much. Just wanted to get the ball rolling again so that
we can reach a decision, instead of just talking about it.
I also think that (while insufficient for the most fun things of
c++11) MSVC11 (VS12) is the
Hi all,
So, the thread died out again.
Who is in favour of the following:
- Require MSVC10 like (aka status quo)
- Require MSVC11
- Require MSVC12
(it would be nice to get the input from kde windows guys as well)
Cheerio,
Ivan
On 17 November 2014 at 14:41, Kai Uwe Broulik
+1 for VC12 (I'm using msvc 2013)
--
Andrius.
2015-01-29 6:49 GMT-02:00 Ivan Čukić ivan.cu...@kde.org:
Hi all,
So, the thread died out again.
Who is in favour of the following:
- Require MSVC10 like (aka status quo)
- Require MSVC11
- Require MSVC12
(it would be nice to get the input
On Thursday 29 January 2015 11:56:51 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Thursday 29 January 2015 09:49:58 Ivan Čukić wrote:
Hi all,
So, the thread died out again.
Who is in favour of the following:
- Require MSVC10 like (aka status quo)
- Require MSVC11
- Require MSVC12
My opinion is
On Monday, 17 November 2014 07:33:00 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2014 18:01:04 Ivan Čukić wrote:
Hi,
The topic of increasing the compiler versions we require might have been
started for the specific issue one of the frameworks had, but I think it
shouldn't have died out
Yeah, it looks like I've been looking at the CTP from November 2012 - for
VS11 [1]. It would be awesome if somebody who has VS11 actually
investigated this. Namely, the 11.0 proper should support variadics up to
some number of arguments (yes, sounds really daft and hackish). If true, it
El 17/11/2014, a las 06:03, Ivan Čukić ivan.cu...@kde.org escribió:
On Monday, 17 November 2014 07:33:00 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2014 18:01:04 Ivan Čukić wrote:
- initializer lists
Unsupported on VS2012.
Again, seems to be that CTP thingie, damn. (though, again, the
El domingo, 16 de noviembre de 2014, Ivan Čukić ivan.cu...@kde.org
escribió:
Hi,
The topic of increasing the compiler versions we require might have been
started for the specific issue one of the frameworks had, but I think it
shouldn't have died out when the issue in question got patched.
- initializer lists
Unsupported on VS2012.
Again, seems to be that CTP thingie, damn. (though, again, the initializer
lists should also be tested - maybe they also work if the number of arguments
is less than ...)
I've had problems with them even on VS2013, like return QHashint,
Hi,
The topic of increasing the compiler versions we require might have been
started for the specific issue one of the frameworks had, but I think it
shouldn't have died out when the issue in question got patched.
IMO, this topic requires more consideration.
Some of the features that we could
On Sunday 16 November 2014 18:01:04 Ivan Čukić wrote:
Hi,
The topic of increasing the compiler versions we require might have been
started for the specific issue one of the frameworks had, but I think it
shouldn't have died out when the issue in question got patched.
IMO, this topic
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 08:53:42 Mirko Boehm wrote:
Hi,
On 05 Nov 2014, at 04:33, Nicolás Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, I hereby propose making an exception and bumping the minimum
compiler version *for ktexteditor only* to MSVC2012. Opinions?
I propose to
Hello,
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 08:58:04 Martin Graesslin wrote:
So in stead of adding one exception after the other, just go the full way
and raise the requirement.
I'm rather against per framework exception too. That said, raising the
requirement should be done responsibly regarding
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 09:05:19 Milian Wolff wrote:
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 00:33:58 Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
So, I hereby propose making an exception and bumping the minimum
compiler version *for ktexteditor only* to MSVC2012. Opinions?
OK from my side, but I'd say Christoph
Hi!
On 05 Nov 2014, at 09:02, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
I propose to bump the required compiler versions across the board to
compilers that fully 100% implement C++11. It is 2014 and C++14 is
finalised. And we are a Free Software project and none of our compilers
have any problems
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
Hello,
Hi all,
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 08:58:04 Martin Graesslin wrote:
So in stead of adding one exception after the other, just go the full way
and raise the requirement.
I'm rather against per framework exception
2014-11-05 9:58 GMT+02:00 Martin Graesslin mgraess...@kde.org:
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 08:53:42 Mirko Boehm wrote:
Hi,
On 05 Nov 2014, at 04:33, Nicolás Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, I hereby propose making an exception and bumping the minimum
compiler version
2014-11-05 9:58 GMT+02:00 Martin Graesslin mgraess...@kde.org:
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 08:53:42 Mirko Boehm wrote:
Hi,
On 05 Nov 2014, at 04:33, Nicolás Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, I hereby propose making an exception and bumping the minimum
compiler
On Wednesday, November 05, 2014 12:33:58 AM Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
Hi all,
According to https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/C++11, KDE
Frameworks support MSVC2010 and later versions. Since ktexteditor is
part of KF5, it is supposed to work on MSVC2010. It currently doesn't;
several
Hello,
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 09:25:27 Mirko Boehm wrote:
On 05 Nov 2014, at 09:02, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
I propose to bump the required compiler versions across the board to
compilers that fully 100% implement C++11. It is 2014 and C++14 is
finalised. And we are a Free
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 14:35:07 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 09:25:27 Mirko Boehm wrote:
On 05 Nov 2014, at 09:02, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
I propose to bump the required compiler versions across the board to
compilers that fully 100%
2014-11-05 10:35 GMT-03:00 Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org:
VS2012 hits the sweet spot of being relatively widespread while starting to
have a useful subset of C++11 (case in point ktexteditor which prompted this
thread builds with it).
Actually I just found it doesn't build with VS2012 either,
Actually I just found it doesn't build with VS2012 either, ugh. And I
expected the fixes to be easier, but it seems I still have to fix the
unit test full of brace initializers for 2012 to work.
I will fix that, after all it's my fault it looks like this. Just tell
me what features I can't use.
2014-11-05 15:18 GMT-03:00 Nicolás Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com:
2014-11-05 10:35 GMT-03:00 Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org:
VS2012 hits the sweet spot of being relatively widespread while starting to
have a useful subset of C++11 (case in point ktexteditor which prompted this
thread builds
Hi,
On 05 Nov 2014, at 04:33, Nicolás Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I hereby propose making an exception and bumping the minimum
compiler version *for ktexteditor only* to MSVC2012. Opinions?
I propose to bump the required compiler versions across the board to compilers
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 08:53:42 Mirko Boehm wrote:
Hi,
On 05 Nov 2014, at 04:33, Nicolás Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, I hereby propose making an exception and bumping the minimum
compiler version *for ktexteditor only* to MSVC2012. Opinions?
I propose to
26 matches
Mail list logo
