On Nov. 15, 2013, 10:09 p.m., Commit Hook wrote:
This review has been submitted with commit
7ec8cf76bad0f16a2947eb6d5986af436a3bdc69 by Martin Klapetek to branch
frameworks.
Erm, sorry, wrong review number in the commit.
- Martin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review43784
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On Nov. 12, 2013, 10:39 a.m., Commit Hook wrote:
This review has been submitted with commit
53e8e439af2483c86b21ad4d53ffe4da622e8c44 by Martin Klapetek to branch
frameworks.
Christoph Feck wrote:
Locally, I get this error:
AUTOMOC: error: process for
On Nov. 12, 2013, 10:39 a.m., Commit Hook wrote:
This review has been submitted with commit
53e8e439af2483c86b21ad4d53ffe4da622e8c44 by Martin Klapetek to branch
frameworks.
Christoph Feck wrote:
Locally, I get this error:
AUTOMOC: error: process for
On Nov. 12, 2013, 10:39 a.m., Commit Hook wrote:
This review has been submitted with commit
53e8e439af2483c86b21ad4d53ffe4da622e8c44 by Martin Klapetek to branch
frameworks.
Locally, I get this error:
AUTOMOC: error: process for /local/build/kf5/runtime/ktimezoned/ktimezoned.moc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review43507
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review43323
---
Ship it!
OK. I only meant don't remove existing code that
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review43331
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- John Layt
On Oct. 22, 2013, 4:49 p.m.,
On Nov. 4, 2013, 4:12 p.m., John Layt wrote:
I've asked on the Qt Development list about Qt 5 Solaris support. I'm told
it builds and works to some extent, and patches are welcome, but not
without having been tested on a real Solaris build first, which I have no
desire to do. I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review42954
---
Looks OK to me, but I'd like John to give it a last look.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review42961
---
I've asked on the Qt Development list about Qt 5 Solaris
On Nov. 4, 2013, 4:12 p.m., John Layt wrote:
I've asked on the Qt Development list about Qt 5 Solaris support. I'm told
it builds and works to some extent, and patches are welcome, but not
without having been tested on a real Solaris build first, which I have no
desire to do. I
On Nov. 4, 2013, 4:12 p.m., John Layt wrote:
I've asked on the Qt Development list about Qt 5 Solaris support. I'm told
it builds and works to some extent, and patches are welcome, but not
without having been tested on a real Solaris build first, which I have no
desire to do. I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review42743
---
Ping, this seems forgotten :)
- Martin Klapetek
On Oct. 22,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/
---
(Updated Oct. 22, 2013, 4:49 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime, KDE
On Oct. 16, 2013, 12:15 p.m., John Layt wrote:
Wow, there sure is a lot of code in there catering for all the possible
corner cases :-) QTimeZone has a lot less places it checks, so I'll need
to do an in-depth comparison, but given Qt5 will only support modern
distros I think most
On Oct. 16, 2013, 12:15 p.m., John Layt wrote:
Wow, there sure is a lot of code in there catering for all the possible
corner cases :-) QTimeZone has a lot less places it checks, so I'll need
to do an in-depth comparison, but given Qt5 will only support modern
distros I think most
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review42017
---
ktimezoned/ktimezonedbase.h
On Oct. 16, 2013, 12:15 p.m., John Layt wrote:
Wow, there sure is a lot of code in there catering for all the possible
corner cases :-) QTimeZone has a lot less places it checks, so I'll need
to do an in-depth comparison, but given Qt5 will only support modern
distros I think most
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2013, 9:13 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime, KDE
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review41816
---
Wow, there sure is a lot of code in there catering for all the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/
---
Review request for KDE Runtime, KDE Frameworks, Plasma, and John Layt.
22 matches
Mail list logo