---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124905/#review99926
---
Reposting here, proposing to reopen it.
After a while: I thi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124905/
---
(Updated July 11, 2016, 4:15 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been di
> On April 18, 2016, 11:05 a.m., Gleb Popov wrote:
> > Let's do something about this. I see two solutions for this:
> >
> > - Add another macro. If we go this route, can we put it in the same .cmake
> > file?
> > - Add a keyword parameter to the existing macro. Because macro uses
> > `${ARGN}`
> On April 18, 2016, 11:05 a.m., Gleb Popov wrote:
> > Let's do something about this. I see two solutions for this:
> >
> > - Add another macro. If we go this route, can we put it in the same .cmake
> > file?
> > - Add a keyword parameter to the existing macro. Because macro uses
> > `${ARGN}`
> On April 18, 2016, 11:05 a.m., Gleb Popov wrote:
> > Let's do something about this. I see two solutions for this:
> >
> > - Add another macro. If we go this route, can we put it in the same .cmake
> > file?
> > - Add a keyword parameter to the existing macro. Because macro uses
> > `${ARGN}`
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124905/#review94684
---
Let's do something about this. I see two solutions for this:
> On Aug. 27, 2015, 9:57 p.m., Patrick Spendrin wrote:
> > Wait, Wait, Wait.
> > 1) The difference between console apps and GUI apps is that console apps
> > actually have stdin, stdout and stderr streams. So using or not using a
> > console app actually depends on if you need to have these str
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124905/#review84496
---
Wait, Wait, Wait.
1) The difference between console apps and G
> On Aug. 26, 2015, 7:24 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > It sounds to me like ecm_mark_non_gui_executable doesn't do the right thing
> > then, and should be fixed, instead?
> >
> > These are non gui executables, so from an "API" point of view, using this
> > function is correct.
> >
> > Would we
> On Aug. 26, 2015, 7:24 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > It sounds to me like ecm_mark_non_gui_executable doesn't do the right thing
> > then, and should be fixed, instead?
> >
> > These are non gui executables, so from an "API" point of view, using this
> > function is correct.
> >
> > Would we
> On Aug. 26, 2015, 7:24 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > It sounds to me like ecm_mark_non_gui_executable doesn't do the right thing
> > then, and should be fixed, instead?
> >
> > These are non gui executables, so from an "API" point of view, using this
> > function is correct.
> >
> > Would we
> On Aug. 26, 2015, 7:24 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > It sounds to me like ecm_mark_non_gui_executable doesn't do the right thing
> > then, and should be fixed, instead?
> >
> > These are non gui executables, so from an "API" point of view, using this
> > function is correct.
> >
> > Would we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124905/#review84389
---
It sounds to me like ecm_mark_non_gui_executable doesn't do th
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124905/#review84357
---
I accidentally pushed this, sorry.
Could you review?
- Kevin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124905/
---
(Updated Aug. 24, 2015, 1:36 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks, Dav
15 matches
Mail list logo