Re: Review Request 127031: Add function to get runtime frameworks version information

2016-03-21 Thread Jarosław Staniek
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127031/#review93814 --- Just wanted to say: thanks for this addition! It is useful

Re: Review Request 127031: Add function to get runtime frameworks version information

2016-02-24 Thread David Edmundson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127031/ --- (Updated Feb. 25, 2016, 1:02 a.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 127031: Add function to get runtime frameworks version information

2016-02-23 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127031/#review92697 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On Feb. 23,

Re: Review Request 127031: Add function to get runtime frameworks version information

2016-02-23 Thread David Edmundson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127031/ --- (Updated Feb. 23, 2016, 1:50 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks.

Re: Review Request 127031: Add function to get runtime frameworks version information

2016-02-19 Thread Kevin Funk
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127031/#review92564 --- src/lib/kcoreaddons.h (line 38)

Re: Review Request 127031: Add function to get runtime frameworks version information

2016-02-19 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127031/#review92559 --- +1 - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On Feb. 19, 2016, 1:46 p.m.,

Re: Review Request 127031: Add function to get runtime frameworks version information

2016-02-19 Thread David Edmundson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127031/ --- (Updated Feb. 19, 2016, 12:46 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks.

Re: Review Request 127031: Add function to get runtime frameworks version information

2016-02-12 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127031/#review92298 --- src/lib/kcoreaddons.h (line 33)

Review Request 127031: Add function to get runtime frameworks version information

2016-02-10 Thread David Edmundson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127031/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kcoreaddons Description

Re: Review Request 127031: Add function to get runtime frameworks version information

2016-02-10 Thread Martin Klapetek
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127031/#review92237 --- +1 - Martin Klapetek On Feb. 10, 2016, 6:10 p.m., David

Re: Review Request 127031: Add function to get runtime frameworks version information

2016-02-10 Thread Albert Astals Cid
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127031/#review92245 --- src/lib/kcoreaddons.h (line 29)

Re: Review Request 127031: Add function to get runtime frameworks version information

2016-02-10 Thread David Edmundson
> On Feb. 10, 2016, 10:14 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > src/lib/kcoreaddons.h, line 29 > > > > > > Documntation is missing > > > > Also "technically" one could mix and max versions even if we don't

Re: Review Request 127031: Add function to get runtime frameworks version information

2016-02-10 Thread David Edmundson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127031/ --- (Updated Feb. 11, 2016, 12:53 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks.

Re: Review Request 127031: Add function to get runtime frameworks version information

2016-02-10 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> On Feb. 10, 2016, 11:14 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > src/lib/kcoreaddons.h, line 29 > > > > > > Documntation is missing > > > > Also "technically" one could mix and max versions even if we don't