---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128466/
---
(Updated July 20, 2016, 1:02 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been di
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 2:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> > P
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 2:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> > P
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 2:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> > P
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 2:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> > P
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 2:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> > P
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 2:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> > P
> On July 18, 2016, 2:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> > P
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 2:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> > P
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On July 18, 2016, 12:05 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
> >
> On Juli 18, 2016, 12:05 nachm., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Please don't ship it, yet.
> >
> >
> > I find the UI illogical. There's a groupbox grouping the checksum buttons,
> > but then you can input the checksum above, so essentially, the groupbox is
> > unnecessary and confusing.
> >
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128466/#review97521
---
Please don't ship it, yet.
I find the UI illogical. There's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128466/#review97484
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Ragnar Thomsen
On July 16, 2016, 2:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128466/#review97482
---
Ship it!
Good idea!
- Emmanuel Pescosta
On July 16, 201
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128466/#review97481
---
Ship it!
As someone who proposed this change I obviously t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128466/
---
(Updated July 16, 2016, 12:35 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks, KD
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128466/#review97475
---
This suggestion sounds reasonable. I like it.
- Gregor Mi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128466/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks, KDE Usability and Dominik Haumann.
Rep
54 matches
Mail list logo
