Re: Review Request 128790: Remove usage of utempter

2016-08-28 Thread Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark
> On Aug. 28, 2016, 1:41 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > uhm, and why do you think utempter is the preferred choice? > > last time i checked, nobody was shipping konsole setgid utmp. with kdeinit, > > that's not even an option. > > > > there are several options how to deal with this: > > -

Re: Review Request 128790: Remove usage of utempter

2016-08-28 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> On Aug. 28, 2016, 1:41 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > uhm, and why do you think utempter is the preferred choice? > > last time i checked, nobody was shipping konsole setgid utmp. with kdeinit, > > that's not even an option. > > > > there are several options how to deal with this: > > -

Re: Review Request 128790: Remove usage of utempter

2016-08-28 Thread Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark
> On Aug. 28, 2016, 1:41 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > uhm, and why do you think utempter is the preferred choice? > > last time i checked, nobody was shipping konsole setgid utmp. with kdeinit, > > that's not even an option. > > > > there are several options how to deal with this: > > -

Re: Review Request 128790: Remove usage of utempter

2016-08-28 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128790/#review98742 --- uhm, and why do you think utempter is the preferred choice?

Review Request 128790: Remove usage of utempter

2016-08-28 Thread Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128790/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks, David Faure, Kurt Hindenburg, Rex