On Nov. 11, 2014, 12:22 p.m., Laurent Montel wrote:
src/lib/text/ktexttohtml.cpp, line 380
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121094/diff/1/?file=327569#file327569line380
same here
There's no semantic difference between x++ and ++x here, I don't see the point
of requesting this
On Nov. 11, 2014, 2:39 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I sincerely think this is a *VERY BAD* idea. I don't want my app behaving
differently depending if a third party misterious compononent that is not
documented anywhere is installed or not. If you have a dependency, well put
it in
On nov. 11, 2014, 2:39 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I sincerely think this is a *VERY BAD* idea. I don't want my app behaving
differently depending if a third party misterious compononent that is not
documented anywhere is installed or not. If you have a dependency, well put
it in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121076/#review70280
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Pedro Francisco
On Nov. 8, 2014,
Ping?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Michael Hansen zrax0...@gmail.com wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120760/
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Christoph Cullmann.
By Michael Hansen.
*Repository: *
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120760/
---
(Updated nov. 12, 2014, 7:06 p.m.)
Review request for Kate, KDE
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120760/#review70293
---
Ship it!
I think the changes makes sense and the code looks
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121109/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Ivan Čukić.
Bugs: 340900
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121109/#review70295
---
Ship it!
Thanks!
- Ivan Čukić
On Nov. 12, 2014, 7:43
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121109/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 8:11 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121095/#review70302
---
Since this seems quite easy to test, I would like automated
On nov. 11, 2014, 2:39 après-midi, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I sincerely think this is a *VERY BAD* idea. I don't want my app behaving
differently depending if a third party misterious compononent that is not
documented anywhere is installed or not. If you have a dependency, well put
On Aug. 2, 2014, 1:25 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
src/xslt.cpp, line 426
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119567/diff/1/?file=294860#file294860line426
Uhm, but that's strange. Just to be sure, do I understand it correctly
that every file in customization is sym-linked? O.o
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:46 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
If it's useful to share it, let's share it, I have no objection to that.
How should this be done? Can I just copy things around and post a RR
or should be this moved around by one of our git curators to preserve
history?
David E.
On Nov. 12, 2014, 10:04 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote:
I would move this perhaps to plasma-workspace since this slave is really
important for nowadays usage of the desktop (android phones etc).
Well, there's important kio's as well in kio-extras. Question is, is it useful
outside the
On Nov. 11, 2014, 2:39 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I sincerely think this is a *VERY BAD* idea. I don't want my app behaving
differently depending if a third party misterious compononent that is not
documented anywhere is installed or not. If you have a dependency, well put
it in
16 matches
Mail list logo
