Hello,
I've been summoned by CCing, loose all hope! :-)
On Sunday 04 January 2015 11:23:49 David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 16 December 2014 14:02:18 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
- If it's effectively GPL-licensed, it should not be a proper Framework
I would like to challenge this reasoning.
It
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121850/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plasma and Vishesh Handa.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121850/
---
(Updated Gen. 5, 2015, 9:41 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121850/
---
(Updated Gen. 5, 2015, 9:41 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
On Wednesday 12 November 2014 18:26:22 David Narvaez wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:46 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
If it's useful to share it, let's share it, I have no objection to that.
How should this be done? Can I just copy things around and post a RR
or should be this moved
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121850/
---
(Updated Jan. 5, 2015, 12:20 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Hi,
On Sunday, January 04, 2015 11:23:49 David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 16 December 2014 14:02:18 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
- If it's effectively GPL-licensed, it should not be a proper Framework
I would like to challenge this reasoning.
It seems to me that the premise is:
* we need baloo
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
Are we going to shoot ourselves in the foot (= making our lives more
complicated, by having a dependency that works differently from the other
dependencies and has to be released separately) just so that we can say
all
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Monday, January 05, 2015 14:32:32 Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
Are we going to shoot ourselves in the foot (= making our lives more
complicated, by
On Monday, January 05, 2015 19:04:43 David Faure wrote:
On Monday 05 January 2015 16:11:21 David Edmundson wrote:
Maybe we could all agree to let Kevin Krammer (as I understand it, the
current head of frameworks) to make a tough executive decision based on
the
thoughts people have had
On Jan. 5, 2015, 9:37 p.m., David Faure wrote:
Ah cool, I didn't know the Qt5 implementation of QFSW solved this. Nice.
Ralf Habacker wrote:
The motivation for KFileSystemWatcher is the following limitation:
* the maximum number of object handles is MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121861/
---
(Updated Jan. 5, 2015, 10:18 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Jan. 4, 2015, 12:02 p.m., David Faure wrote:
This undoes 4846b50aea0bc2262238963a85ab3556c22412e4
(https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117010/), basically.
However looking back at the discussions with Alexander Richardson, this
might be only a revert of the part that went further
plasma-nm has gained an extra release, 5.1.2.1, which updates it to
use networkmanager-qt (the new name of libnm-qt) 5.6.0 which is due to
be released with the KDE Frameworks 5 release tomorrow. It will not
compile with libnm-qt as released with Plasma 5.1.x, just keep using
plasma-nm 5.1.2 is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121864/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: knotifications
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121865/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: karchive
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121861/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kcoreaddons
Description
On Jan. 4, 2015, 12:02 p.m., David Faure wrote:
This undoes 4846b50aea0bc2262238963a85ab3556c22412e4
(https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117010/), basically.
However looking back at the discussions with Alexander Richardson, this
might be only a revert of the part that went further
On gen. 4, 2015, 5:02 p.m., David Faure wrote:
This undoes 4846b50aea0bc2262238963a85ab3556c22412e4
(https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117010/), basically.
However looking back at the discussions with Alexander Richardson, this
might be only a revert of the part that went further
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121865/#review73199
---
Ship it!
the commit log is a bit confusing though. Did you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121862/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks, David Faure, Martin Gräßlin, and Hrvoje
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121862/#review73173
---
This won't be in KF 5.6, which is already tagged, while this
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:27 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Wednesday 12 November 2014 18:26:22 David Narvaez wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:46 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
If it's useful to share it, let's share it, I have no objection to
that.
How should this be
23 matches
Mail list logo
