Re: Review Request 125337: Mark kconfig-compiler as non-gui tool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125337/ --- (Updated Sept. 25, 2015, 11:02 a.m.) Status -- This change has been

Review Request 125390: Fix build on Mac OS X

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125390/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Alex Merry. Repository:

Jenkins-kde-ci: kio master stable-kf5-qt5 » Linux,gcc - Build # 96 - Still Unstable!

GENERAL INFO BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/kio%20master%20stable-kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/96/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc Date of build: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:15:54 + Build duration: 4 min 48 sec CHANGE SET Revision

Jenkins-kde-ci: kio master kf5-qt5 » Linux,gcc - Build # 104 - Still Unstable!

GENERAL INFO BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/kio%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/104/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc Date of build: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:15:54 + Build duration: 5 min 2 sec CHANGE SET Revision 37a3286b0acbe8be377a8e21d92ea5a4aace35df

Re: Review Request 125390: Fix build on Mac OS X

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125390/#review85933 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alex Merry On Sept. 25, 2015, 11:08

Re: Review Request 125284: make install name of applications.menu file a cached cmake variable

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125284/ --- (Updated Sept. 25, 2015, 7:47 a.m.) Status -- This change has been

Jenkins-kde-ci: kservice master stable-kf5-qt5 » Linux,gcc - Build # 81 - Fixed!

GENERAL INFO BUILD SUCCESS Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/kservice%20master%20stable-kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/81/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc Date of build: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 07:29:33 + Build duration: 2 min 20 sec CHANGE SET Revision

Jenkins-kde-ci: kservice master stable-kf5-qt5 » Linux,gcc - Build # 81 - Fixed!

GENERAL INFO BUILD SUCCESS Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/kservice%20master%20stable-kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/81/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc Date of build: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 07:29:33 + Build duration: 2 min 20 sec CHANGE SET Revision

Re: Review Request 125208: Fixes file dialog randomly not showing up with frameworkintegration

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125208/#review85923 --- Looks good as far as I can tell - Martin Klapetek On Sept.

Re: KTabWidget vs QTabWidget

On 09/25/2015 01:57 AM, Jeremy Whiting wrote: Michel, Would you mind if I move the DropWidget you wrote for kile into kwidgetsaddons and give it a name like KDropWidget and relicense it to LGPL v2+ ? That's totally fine with me. Michel ___

Re: kcrash when started from terminal

On 2015-09-24, Harald Sitter wrote: > Uh, ah, but, CMake is too smart :P > If you add a target_link_library that isn't actually used it won't be > linked. So what every application would have to do is add the target It is not cmake that is too smart, but the linker when passed

Re: [KDE/Mac] [OS X] adding a link module to all KF5 targets

On Thursday September 24 2015 22:56:37 David Faure wrote: > [warning: long, and I change my mind mid-way; I left it all so you can follow > my reasoning] Seems like a gradual change of mind :) > If you're really only thinking of apps made by the KDE community, I would be > surprised to see any

Re: [KDE/Mac] [OS X] adding a link module to all KF5 targets

And another "one more thing": Back when we attempted a first Qt code review, the proposed change was rejected in large part because some Qt devs were against implementing a patch that was only for the benefit of KF5 apps and something that was presented too much as a KF5 issue. IIRC, the

Re: Review Request 125386: qca-ossl: Fix build without SSLv3

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125386/#review85918 --- +1 - David Edmundson On Sept. 24, 2015, 9:29 p.m., Heiko

Re: Icons installed by apps

Thanks for advice David. In the specs I see no mention about using share/{app}/ subdirs. I also noted this: "It is recommended that the icons installed in the hicolor theme look neutral, since it is a fallback theme that will be used in combination with some very different looking themes." For