> On May 23, 2016, 11:20 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Please note that:
> > * the Q_BYTE_ORDER change was reverted, since it made the wallet storage
> > incompatible with previous releases. This needs further analysis in order
> > to improve the code while retaining compat.
> > * kwallet is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128238/#review96852
---
Ping?
- Elvis Angelaccio
On June 18, 2016, 5:18 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128254/
---
(Updated June 25, 2016, 9:32 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128249/#review96850
---
Cool, thanks Andreas!
- Kevin Funk
On June 24, 2016, 8:17
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128023/#review96851
---
Ping?
- Elvis Angelaccio
On May 26, 2016, 11:35 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128191/
---
(Updated June 25, 2016, 9:10 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On dimanche 19 juin 2016 21:29:37 CEST Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to add the python bindings previously discussed to the next
> release of KF5. This means adding the four most recent commits from
>
> https://github.com/steveire/extra-cmake-modules/commits/python-bindings
>
>
> On May 18, 2016, 2:16 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
> > A better approach I think would be to have a simple checkbox, store
> > that in a config and then have KNotification/NotifyByAudio simply
> > do nothing if that config/value is present.
> >
> > Or even have
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128283/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks, KDE Usability and David Faure.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128283/#review96859
---
Nice feature, but please only start the calculation when
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128283/#review96862
---
First of all: I love the feature as such, as it makes the
> On June 25, 2016, 11:35 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > I wished it was for the KIO overwrite dialog ;)
> >
> > Anyway, reading the file three times without the user asking for the
> > checksums is a recipe for disk cache draining.
> >
> > I suggest to compute all checksums in parallel,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128283/#review96858
---
I wished it was for the KIO overwrite dialog ;)
Anyway,
> On June 25, 2016, 12:52 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > First of all: I love the feature as such, as it makes the whole checksum
> > comparison story actually usable for average users (although they'd still
> > have to be told how to do it because they'd probably not get the idea that
> >
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128283/
---
(Updated June 25, 2016, 2:52 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
15 matches
Mail list logo
