Hi,
2012/7/9 Иван Комиссаров:
Hm, it seems that Qt guys are not very happy seeing KDE features in qt.
I would like someone from KDE to participate in discussions about changes.
For example, they insist that KTabBar functionality is not needed as it can
be easily implemented in subclass:)
Hm, previos message was rejected as spam:)
Ok, if KDE devs can live without tis signal, i can live too. However we
could just rename it to something less specific than 'newTabrequested but
not confusing with doublClicked().
So, before i start other work with tabbar i would like to ask some
On Monday 09 July 2012 15:46:25 David Faure wrote:
PS: calling people stupid won't get you far in terms of respect within the
Qt community.
Or the KDE community for that matter: http://www.kde.org/code-of-conduct/
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
KDAB - proud patron of KDE,
Ok, that's very interesting, but i asked two questions and still don't see any
answer. No offence, Kevin, i just prefer discuss code, not my communication
skiils.
09.07.2012, в 18:34, Kevin Ottens написал(а):
On Monday 09 July 2012 15:46:25 David Faure wrote:
PS: calling people stupid won't
On Monday 09 July 2012 18:05:07 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
Ok, if KDE devs can live without tis signal, i can live too. However we
could just rename it to something less specific than 'newTabrequested but
not confusing with doublClicked().
And we can also add an if() in the apps when porting them
Hi,
I just want to give some rough notes on a couple of the sessions I
attended at QtCS and my impressions on some of the discussions. See
the Qt development mailing list for more detailed minutes from most
sessions.
Locale:
---
Minutes posted to list.
* ICU will become the Locale backend
