Re: Frameworks Overview

2013-09-27 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Friday 27 September 2013, Ben Cooksley wrote: > ... >> Yep. At the moment there are no real contenders as such - which is why >> it has not yet been replaced. >> Phabricator is being monitored for progress on a blocking issue however.

Re: Frameworks Overview

2013-09-27 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Friday 27 September 2013, Ben Cooksley wrote: ... > Yep. At the moment there are no real contenders as such - which is why > it has not yet been replaced. > Phabricator is being monitored for progress on a blocking issue however. > > The primary issues are those of performance ( That's a pity.

Re: Review Request 112928: Template files for frameworks

2013-09-27 Thread Alexander Neundorf
> On Sept. 26, 2013, 8:27 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > template/CMakeLists.txt, line 22 > > > > > > The idea here was that you can simply list all required KF5 frameworks > > in one find_package() call: > >

Re: Review Request 112928: Template files for frameworks

2013-09-27 Thread Alexander Neundorf
> On Sept. 26, 2013, 8:27 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > template/CMakeLists.txt, line 22 > > > > > > The idea here was that you can simply list all required KF5 frameworks > > in one find_package() call: > >

Re: Review Request 112928: Template files for frameworks

2013-09-27 Thread Alexander Neundorf
> On Sept. 26, 2013, 8:27 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > template/CMakeLists.txt, line 22 > > > > > > The idea here was that you can simply list all required KF5 frameworks > > in one find_package() call: > >

Re: Review Request 112921: Adjust CMakeLists.txt files in KEmoticons (prior to splitting)

2013-09-27 Thread David Gil Oliva
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112921/ --- (Updated Sept. 27, 2013, 5:33 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 112928: Template files for frameworks

2013-09-27 Thread Stephen Kelly
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112928/#review40917 --- This looks complete to me. - Stephen Kelly On Sept. 27, 2013

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-27 Thread John Layt
On 27 September 2013 16:52, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Wednesday 25 September 2013 11:28:54 John Layt wrote: >> Started to look at the number of uses, but lxr hardly shows any. Does >> lxr include .ui files, or do I need to grep? > > I don't think it does unfortunately. No, doesn't appear to, I'm

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-27 Thread John Layt
On 25 September 2013 17:21, Mark wrote: > >> >> I've been >> talking to the QML component guys and they will have a new calendar >> component for 5.3 that they need QCalendarSystem for as well. > > > > Hi John, > > What you said there sounds very interesting to me! Do you have any link for > me

Re: Review Request 112928: Template files for frameworks

2013-09-27 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
> On Sept. 26, 2013, 10:27 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > template/CMakeLists.txt, line 22 > > > > > > The idea here was that you can simply list all required KF5 frameworks > > in one find_package() call: >

Re: Review Request 112928: Template files for frameworks

2013-09-27 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112928/ --- (Updated Sept. 27, 2013, 5:05 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks, Kev

Re: Making KDocTools independent of KArchive

2013-09-27 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Wednesday 25 September 2013 01:13:05 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dimarts, 24 de setembre de 2013, a les 14:09:57, Kevin Ottens va escriure: > > On Tuesday 24 September 2013 13:48:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > El Dimarts, 24 de setembre de 2013, a les 08:49:20, Kevin Ottens va > > > > esc

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-27 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Wednesday 25 September 2013 11:28:54 John Layt wrote: > On 24 September 2013 19:24, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote: > >> I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are > >> worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to see if

Re: Review Request 112928: Template files for frameworks

2013-09-27 Thread Stephen Kelly
> On Sept. 26, 2013, 8:27 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > template/CMakeLists.txt, line 22 > > > > > > The idea here was that you can simply list all required KF5 frameworks > > in one find_package() call: > >

Re: Review Request 112928: Template files for frameworks

2013-09-27 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
> On Sept. 26, 2013, 10:27 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > template/CMakeLists.txt, line 22 > > > > > > The idea here was that you can simply list all required KF5 frameworks > > in one find_package() call: >

Review Request 112966: Dispatch KInterProcessWindowing to other frameworks

2013-09-27 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112966/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks, Kevin Ottens and Martin Gräßlin. Descri

Re: Review Request 112921: Adjust CMakeLists.txt files in KEmoticons (prior to splitting)

2013-09-27 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112921/#review40906 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Faure On Sept. 25, 2013, 8:21 p.m

Re: Frameworks Overview

2013-09-27 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Tuesday 24 September 2013, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Sep 24, 2013 7:33 AM, "Alexander Neundorf" wrote: >> > On Monday 23 September 2013, Sebastian Kügler wrote: >> > > Hey, >> > > >> > > On Monday, September 23, 2013 00:27:21 Corneli

Review Request 112964: Prepare KPrintUtils cmake stuff

2013-09-27 Thread Martin Klapetek
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112964/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Description --- ...before splittin

Re: Review Request 112896: Rework NETWM classes

2013-09-27 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On Sept. 26, 2013, 4:27 a.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote: > > I'm just going to point out something I know you already know since we've > > discussed it many times; > > that an xcb port of the NETWM classes already exists in a branch. > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > my aim was to write the unit te