On Friday 27 December 2013 19:00:14 Aleix Pol wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been going through the kde4support forward includes, since I wanted to
> start making the modules I decided we'd better make sure all of them are
> working properly.
>
> After some research, I found that I don't have these available
Hi,
Here's a patch adding CamelCase headers to KCoreAddons (attached).
If we agree that it's the proper way of doing it, I'll proceed to do it on
the rest of modules.
Cheers!
Aleix
diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt
index 389245c..ba6644a 100644
--- a/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/CMakeLists.txt
Am Dienstag, 24. Dezember 2013, 18:17:48 schrieb Bhushan Shah:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Aleix Pol wrote:
> > I'll try to take some time after the 26th to do it. If somebody wants to
> > do
> > it meanwhile, please do and I'll review it.
>
> I have some spare time and want to
Hi,
I've been going through the kde4support forward includes, since I wanted to
start making the modules I decided we'd better make sure all of them are
working properly.
After some research, I found that I don't have these available, can
somebody please tell me if I'm missing some dependency or i
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114683/
---
(Updated Dec. 27, 2013, 4:29 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114683/#review46194
---
This review has been submitted with commit
778bf0ac0b057db190
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114683/#review46193
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Dec. 27, 2013, 2
On Tuesday 10 December 2013 23:31:33 David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 December 2013 21:48:09 Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > It seems that the behavior for "None" is different. Interestingly,
> > KSaveFile also behaved like this (KFilterDev did not change after all I
> > guess).
> I'm surprised, becau
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114683/
---
Review request for Build System, KDE Frameworks and Plasma.
Repository: p
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114478/#review46183
---
This review has been submitted with commit
c48bce3c47a7c160aa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114478/
---
(Updated Dec. 27, 2013, 12:13 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114478/#review46182
---
Ship it!
As per discussion on kde-frameworks list. I'll have
On 27/12/13 11:30, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Friday 27 December 2013 11:22:57 Alex Merry wrote:
>> On 27/12/13 11:04, Kevin Ottens wrote:
>>> On Monday 23 December 2013 14:51:19 Alex Merry wrote:
Actually, I think we should just install application files directly in
share/applications. (ie
On Friday 27 December 2013 11:22:57 Alex Merry wrote:
> On 27/12/13 11:04, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Monday 23 December 2013 14:51:19 Alex Merry wrote:
> >> Actually, I think we should just install application files directly in
> >> share/applications. (ie: change the value of XDG_APPS_INSTALL_DIR
On 27/12/13 11:04, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Monday 23 December 2013 14:51:19 Alex Merry wrote:
>> Actually, I think we should just install application files directly in
>> share/applications. (ie: change the value of XDG_APPS_INSTALL_DIR in
>> KDEInstallDirs.cmake). It makes everyone's lives more
Hello,
Any news on that front? I see kde4support is still the one not green because
of that test.
I see that Alex is kind of waiting for someone to take a side on the possible
solutions. See below for my own take but I don't know KStandardDirs enough to
have a valuable opinion.
/me looks at D
On Thursday 26 December 2013, Alex Merry wrote:
> How much do we care about users of frameworks who don't use CMake? Do
> we want to provide pkg-config files? How easy is it to do so?
>
> (My personal answers would be: enough to put in a little effort, but not
> a huge one; yes, if it's easy; th
On Monday 23 December 2013 19:45:36 Alex Merry wrote:
> On 23/12/13 18:46, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > - plasma-framework: this framework uses multiple licenses, but majority is
> > LGPL (this is the case for many other frameworks). Should we use a LGPL
> > 2.1
> > COPYING.LIB file?
>
> A quick att
18 matches
Mail list logo