On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 09:35:12 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 12:11 AM, Aleix Pol wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Christian Mollekopf
chrig...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Hi Christian,
I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123556/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Plasma.
Repository: kpackage
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123556/
---
(Updated April 29, 2015, 10:51 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks
On Dub. 28, 2015, 4:09 odp., Lamarque Souza wrote:
It worked here, so it's a +1 from me. I just would like the
extra-cmake-module maintainer to give the final ship it.
Jan Grulich wrote:
Hmm, I realized that this would break backward compatibility with
plasma-nm, because in
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 12:11 AM, Aleix Pol wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Christian Mollekopf
chrig...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Hi Christian,
I understand your needs, I've seen similar complaints before.
Letting frameworks depend on different versions could make sense, but
I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123542/
---
(Updated April 29, 2015, 8:23 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks
On Dub. 28, 2015, 4:09 odp., Lamarque Souza wrote:
It worked here, so it's a +1 from me. I just would like the
extra-cmake-module maintainer to give the final ship it.
Hmm, I realized that this would break backward compatibility with plasma-nm,
because in plasma-nm we use
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 09:35:12 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 12:11 AM, Aleix Pol wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Christian Mollekopf
chrig...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Hi Christian,
I understand your needs, I've seen similar complaints before.
On April 28, 2015, 7:31 p.m., Alex Richardson wrote:
src/runtime/globalshortcutsregistry.cpp, line 40
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123542/diff/1/?file=364188#file364188line40
You could use
`KPluginLoader::forEachPlugin(org.kde.kglobalaccel5.platforms, [](const
QString
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123556/#review79667
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
src/kpackage/packageloader.h (line 59)
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 01:29 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 12:19:18 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 09:35:12 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 12:11 AM, Aleix Pol
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 12:19:18 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 09:35:12 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 12:11 AM, Aleix Pol wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Christian Mollekopf
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123556/
---
(Updated April 29, 2015, 12:12 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 12:17:00 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
Hey,
For the Kolab Groupware Server we use some KDE libraries on the server.
Servers being what they are, the libraries we require are often not
available by default because the systems are too old, and we end-up
backporting
On April 24, 2015, 3:49 p.m., Kevin Funk wrote:
modules/ECMGeneratePriFile.cmake, line 180
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123491/diff/2/?file=362992#file362992line180
Just tested the patch myself on sonnet.
The test indeed breaks if sonnet is not installed
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123514/
---
(Updated April 29, 2015, 6:28 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 15:00:32 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
You don't have to maintain any other combinations that what you already
do.
Just because the cmake versions aren't automatically bumped doesn't mean
you suddenly have to test every conceivable combination of versions.
How can the
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 15:21:58 Aleix Pol wrote:
Hi,
I was looking into a problem, and ended up in this web page:
https://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Debugging/Debugging_IOSlaves
After some greps, I realized most of it is gone. Anybody knows what's
up with this? And if
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 11:24:48 Kevin Funk wrote:
Use-case: Potential contributor working on KDevelop:
- Has KF5 installed from distro packages
- KDevelop/KDevPlatform compiled from Git
- There's a bug in ktexteditor (tier 3)
- Likes to checkout just ktexteditor, fix the issue, compile,
Christian,
David isn't the only one with these thoughts. I agree with everything
he said, and was thinking about the dependency zoo also, but couldn't
form the words until I read what he wrote. That's exactly what I was
thinking. It would be like the old rpm dependency hell from early
linux days
On Tuesday 28 April 2015 12:17:00 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
Our dependency tree is now indeed reduced, but if we want to update a
single library, we are forced to update all libraries, due to the
version-lock caused by periodic bumping of dependencies.
You say at the end of the mail that you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123556/#review79698
---
src/kpackage/packageloader.cpp (line 273)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123491/
---
(Updated abr. 29, 2015, 11:23 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123514/#review79704
---
autotests/accessmanagertest.cpp (line 79)
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:33 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 15:21:58 Aleix Pol wrote:
Hi,
I was looking into a problem, and ended up in this web page:
https://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Debugging/Debugging_IOSlaves
After some greps, I realized
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123514/
---
(Updated April 30, 2015, 2:08 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks
On April 30, 2015, 1:53 a.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
autotests/accessmanagertest.cpp, line 82
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123514/diff/2/?file=364611#file364611line82
The / should be a QDir::separator, no?
Nope. Qt decodes the / accordingly.
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5.4/qdir.html
Qt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123567/#review79686
---
shouldn't something like this be provided by the
Hi,
I was looking into a problem, and ended up in this web page:
https://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Debugging/Debugging_IOSlaves
After some greps, I realized most of it is gone. Anybody knows what's
up with this? And if there's anything we can do to debug an ioslave,
anyway?
Cheers!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123525/
---
(Updated April 29, 2015, 1:38 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On April 29, 2015, 1:55 p.m., Milian Wolff wrote:
shouldn't something like this be provided by the distribution? doesn't make
much sense to have it on non-arch systems, no?
Anthony Vital wrote:
I don't know but there are search providers for debian and opensuse
already.
ah ok,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123567/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kio
Description
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123523/
---
(Updated April 29, 2015, 1:38 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On avr. 29, 2015, 1:55 après-midi, Milian Wolff wrote:
shouldn't something like this be provided by the distribution? doesn't make
much sense to have it on non-arch systems, no?
I don't know but there are search providers for debian and opensuse already.
- Anthony
34 matches
Mail list logo
