On Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2016 17:21:33 CET Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
[snip]
> whether kglobalshortcuts is functional or not is besides the point:
> the point is that whether it works or not it doesn't add any
> functionality to the average application. Global shortcuts are useful
> only for a very
Martin Graesslin wrote:
> That depends on the Wayland compositor. In Plasma (KWin) we will certainly
> make sure this works properly.
I'd appreciate if that could be done in a way that makes sense on other
platforms too...
> But yes currently it most likely will open
> somewhere behind just
On Wednesday 27 January 2016 18:19:49 Aleix Pol wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to move KCoreAddons qml plugin into KCoreAddons. Now it's
> KDeclarative where we are dumping all QML plugins.
>
> I think it's a good idea because:
> - it simplifies usage the plugins for such frameworks (kcoreaddons is
I'm working on a replacement for the favicons kded module (which lives in
libkonq),
which will be a class in kio instead (proper C++ API certainly beats just a
DBus interface
as public API).
I started from the DBus API of the kded module, cleaned up a number
of things (in particular the awful
On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 10:32:50 AM EST Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016, David Faure wrote:
> > (I don't mean "it's called KConfig" ;-) I mean what does the code using
> > it, look like? I think this needs some debugging to find out where this
> > "local" string comes from)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126887/
---
(Updated Jan. 27, 2016, 9:07 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
> On Jan. 26, 2016, 7:40 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm a bit afraid of all these ifndef. Do you think it would make sense to
> > abstract out the KGlobalAccel usage?
> >
> > Otherwise, would it be possible to make KGlobalAccel useful (or just dumb)
> > on Windows?
>
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126908/#review91668
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jonathan Riddell
On Jan. 27, 2016,
> On Jan. 26, 2016, 6:40 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm a bit afraid of all these ifndef. Do you think it would make sense to
> > abstract out the KGlobalAccel usage?
> >
> > Otherwise, would it be possible to make KGlobalAccel useful (or just dumb)
> > on Windows?
>
>
Hi,
I would like to move KCoreAddons qml plugin into KCoreAddons. Now it's
KDeclarative where we are dumping all QML plugins.
I think it's a good idea because:
- it simplifies usage the plugins for such frameworks (kcoreaddons is
not the only one).
- it ensures the code related to a feature is
> On Jan. 26, 2016, 6:40 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm a bit afraid of all these ifndef. Do you think it would make sense to
> > abstract out the KGlobalAccel usage?
> >
> > Otherwise, would it be possible to make KGlobalAccel useful (or just dumb)
> > on Windows?
>
>
> On Jan. 26, 2016, 6:40 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm a bit afraid of all these ifndef. Do you think it would make sense to
> > abstract out the KGlobalAccel usage?
> >
> > Otherwise, would it be possible to make KGlobalAccel useful (or just dumb)
> > on Windows?
>
>
> On Jan. 26, 2016, 7:40 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm a bit afraid of all these ifndef. Do you think it would make sense to
> > abstract out the KGlobalAccel usage?
> >
> > Otherwise, would it be possible to make KGlobalAccel useful (or just dumb)
> > on Windows?
>
>
> On Jan. 26, 2016, 7:40 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm a bit afraid of all these ifndef. Do you think it would make sense to
> > abstract out the KGlobalAccel usage?
> >
> > Otherwise, would it be possible to make KGlobalAccel useful (or just dumb)
> > on Windows?
>
>
> On Jan. 26, 2016, 6:40 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm a bit afraid of all these ifndef. Do you think it would make sense to
> > abstract out the KGlobalAccel usage?
> >
> > Otherwise, would it be possible to make KGlobalAccel useful (or just dumb)
> > on Windows?
>
>
> On Jan. 26, 2016, 6:40 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm a bit afraid of all these ifndef. Do you think it would make sense to
> > abstract out the KGlobalAccel usage?
> >
> > Otherwise, would it be possible to make KGlobalAccel useful (or just dumb)
> > on Windows?
>
>
> On Jan. 26, 2016, 6:40 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm a bit afraid of all these ifndef. Do you think it would make sense to
> > abstract out the KGlobalAccel usage?
> >
> > Otherwise, would it be possible to make KGlobalAccel useful (or just dumb)
> > on Windows?
>
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126675/
---
(Updated Jan. 27, 2016, 9:48 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
> On Jan. 26, 2016, 7:40 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm a bit afraid of all these ifndef. Do you think it would make sense to
> > abstract out the KGlobalAccel usage?
> >
> > Otherwise, would it be possible to make KGlobalAccel useful (or just dumb)
> > on Windows?
>
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126895/
---
(Updated Jan. 27, 2016, 8:53 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
> On Jan. 27, 2016, 7:02 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Just in case that there is misunderstanding going on:
> >
> > > Global Shortcuts (we don't have kded so this won't work for us anyway)
> >
> > Global shortcut handling does not depend on kded!
> >
> > Also I want to point out to
> >
> On Jan. 27, 2016, 8:02 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Just in case that there is misunderstanding going on:
> >
> > > Global Shortcuts (we don't have kded so this won't work for us anyway)
> >
> > Global shortcut handling does not depend on kded!
> >
> > Also I want to point out to
> >
Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
Hi,
>> Are there other platforms where WIds cannot be used for this kind of use
>> case (MS Windows for instance)?
>
> Wayland.
So how do the dialogs behave when, say, kwalletmanager asks kwalletd to unlock
a
locked keychain and a password or passphrase is required?
On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 3:45:12 PM CET René J. V. Bertin wrote:
> Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> Are there other platforms where WIds cannot be used for this kind of use
> >> case (MS Windows for instance)?
> >
> > Wayland.
>
> So how do the dialogs behave when, say,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126903/#review91664
---
+1
Smells like a bug in Qt?
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Jan.
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016, David Faure wrote:
Not sure this answers Boud's question, since he *is* seeing "Local" on Windows.
He said: "I noticed that krita on windows wrote its kritarc to Roaming\local\ or
Local\local "
Hm, looks like that was a sideeffect of something else I tried, it's now in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126903/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Christoph Feck.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126908/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Jonathan Riddell.
Repository:
28 matches
Mail list logo
