Re: Review Request 127094: Don't use up 16K of /dev/urandom to seed rand() in KRandom

2016-02-16 Thread Michael Pyne
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127094/ --- (Updated Feb. 16, 2016, 9:04 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 127094: Don't use up 16K of /dev/urandom to seed rand() in KRandom

2016-02-16 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127094/#review92479 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On Feb. 17, 2016

Re: libkonq release? I'm missing the favicons interface

2016-02-16 Thread Robby Stephenson
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 5:00 PM, David Faure wrote: > I'm curious though, what's the use case for a large favicon? In KDE4 the > only > time I see this is when using Alt+Tab and with konqueror windows open (and > that > looks a bit weird because other apps have a much bigger icon than konq's, > b

Review Request 127094: Don't use up 16K of /dev/urandom to seed rand() in KRandom

2016-02-16 Thread Michael Pyne
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127094/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Bugs: 359485 https://bugs.kde.org/

Re: Review Request 126291: initial implementation of a platform plugin for OS X (WIP)

2016-02-16 Thread René J . V . Bertin
> On Feb. 15, 2016, 8:42 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > Thanks for contributing the code, I'm very happy to see this happening! > > Sorry, that I cannot provide a good review as I'm not really into the OSX > > API, thus my review here might look a little bit nitpicky. > > > > General comment:

Re: Review Request 126291: initial implementation of a platform plugin for OS X (WIP)

2016-02-16 Thread René J . V . Bertin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126291/ --- (Updated Feb. 17, 2016, 12:23 a.m.) Review request for KDE Software on Ma

Re: libkonq release? I'm missing the favicons interface

2016-02-16 Thread David Faure
On Monday 15 February 2016 20:09:40 Robby Stephenson wrote: > On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 10:21 AM, David Faure wrote: > > > Unaware of this discussion (no time to read kde-devel), I have done exactly > > this during January. KIO (starting from 5.19) now has a KIOGui library > > with a > > FavIconRequ

Re: Review Request 127091: Fix IconItem regression in 5.19

2016-02-16 Thread Daniel Vrátil
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127091/ --- (Updated Feb. 16, 2016, 3:16 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 127091: Fix IconItem regression in 5.19

2016-02-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127091/#review92470 --- Is this testable at all? - Albert Astals Cid On Feb. 16, 2

Re: KActivities repository split

2016-02-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Tuesday 16 February 2016, a les 13:31:40, Ivan Čukić va escriure: > Hi everyone, > > As previously announced, KActivities has been split into a few > separate repositories. This mail is mostly intended to notify our dear > packagers of the change, and the plan for the transition period. > > KA

Re: Review Request 127091: Fix IconItem regression in 5.19

2016-02-16 Thread Milian Wolff
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127091/#review92467 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Milian Wolff On Feb. 16, 2016, 4:52

Re: Review Request 127091: Fix IconItem regression in 5.19

2016-02-16 Thread David Rosca
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127091/#review92461 --- src/declarativeimports/core/iconitem.cpp (line 151)

Review Request 127091: Fix IconItem regression in 5.19

2016-02-16 Thread Daniel Vrátil
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127091/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plasma and David Edmundson. Bugs: 3593

Jenkins-kde-ci: kwindowsystem master kf5-qt5 » Linux,All,gcc - Build # 62 - Unstable!

2016-02-16 Thread no-reply
GENERAL INFO BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/kwindowsystem%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=All,compiler=gcc/62/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=All,compiler=gcc Date of build: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:09:26 + Build duration: 2 min 13 sec CHANGE SET Revision 2a5b

Jenkins-kde-ci: kwindowsystem master stable-kf5-qt5 » Linux,All,gcc - Build # 59 - Still Unstable!

2016-02-16 Thread no-reply
GENERAL INFO BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/kwindowsystem%20master%20stable-kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=All,compiler=gcc/59/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=All,compiler=gcc Date of build: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:09:26 + Build duration: 2 min 16 sec CHANGE SET Revisi

Review Request 127090: Clean KWalletQuery cmake file

2016-02-16 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127090/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Valentin Rusu. Repository: kwallet

Re: Review Request 127088: Let KDocTools stay optional on KPackage

2016-02-16 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127088/ --- (Updated Feb. 16, 2016, 3:19 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 127088: Let KDocTools stay optional on KPackage

2016-02-16 Thread Marco Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127088/#review92448 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Marco Martin On Feb. 16, 2016, 2:18

Review Request 127088: Let KDocTools stay optional on KPackage

2016-02-16 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127088/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Plasma. Repository: kpackage Desc

Re: Review Request 127029: Fix chromium/wine apps not being added to the menu for some distributions.

2016-02-16 Thread David Edmundson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127029/ --- (Updated Feb. 16, 2016, 1:40 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: KActivities repository split

2016-02-16 Thread Luigi Toscano
Ivan Čukić ha scritto: > Hi everyone, > > As previously announced, KActivities has been split into a few > separate repositories. This mail is mostly intended to notify our dear > packagers of the change, and the plan for the transition period. > > KActivities framework 5.19 (as released a few da

KActivities repository split

2016-02-16 Thread Ivan Čukić
Hi everyone, As previously announced, KActivities has been split into a few separate repositories. This mail is mostly intended to notify our dear packagers of the change, and the plan for the transition period. KActivities framework 5.19 (as released a few days ago) contains everything that it u