---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128675/
---
(Updated Sept. 4, 2016, 9:53 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Hello!
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:04:47PM +0200, David Faure wrote:
> Right, putting the autocorrect feature in sonnet looks like a good idea to me.
> But ultimately it's up to the sonnet maintainer --> cc'ing Martin Sandsmark.
I'm not opposed to putting it into Sonnet, but I don't have time to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128831/
---
(Updated Sept. 4, 2016, 11:20 nachm.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128831/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Bugs: 358260
> On Sept. 4, 2016, 2:13 p.m., Thiago Macieira wrote:
> >
What happens if one builds on a machine without utempter? Are we still linking
to libutempter?
- Thiago
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
Le dimanche 4 septembre 2016, 15:39:43 CEST Martin Sandsmark a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:04:47PM +0200, David Faure wrote:
> > Right, putting the autocorrect feature in sonnet looks like a good idea to
> > me. But ultimately it's up to the sonnet maintainer --> cc'ing Martin
kfunk added a comment.
Here's the backtrace (note: using Qt 5.6 branch):
ntdll.dll!NtWaitForSingleObject () Unknown
KernelBase.dll!7ffbcb2eaadf() Unknown
> Qt5Core.dll!QWaitCondition::wait(QMutex * mutex=0x01c24fd16520,
unsigned long
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128790/
---
(Updated Sept. 4, 2016, 10:20 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
