Re: kf6 vs. kf5 conflict report
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 6:21 PM Luigi Toscano wrote: > > Harald Sitter ha scritto: > > Salut, > > > > Conflict reports are now available form neon ci and can be triggered > > by yourself. They are usually lagging a day behind as automatic binary > > builds only occur once a day. > > > > Notable changes from last time are that ECM is skipped as a whole and > > locale conflicts have been resolved. Much smaller file now :) > > > > https://build.neon.kde.org/view/testy/job/test_kf6_deconflictor/ > > That's useful, thanks. > > Now, not all translation conflicts have been solved yet, but I don't see any > in the report. Is that wanted? Good catch, a bug snuck in when I moved this to the CI. It should be correctly tracking l10n again now. HS
Re: kf6 vs. kf5 conflict report
Harald Sitter ha scritto: > Salut, > > Conflict reports are now available form neon ci and can be triggered > by yourself. They are usually lagging a day behind as automatic binary > builds only occur once a day. > > Notable changes from last time are that ECM is skipped as a whole and > locale conflicts have been resolved. Much smaller file now :) > > https://build.neon.kde.org/view/testy/job/test_kf6_deconflictor/ That's useful, thanks. Now, not all translation conflicts have been solved yet, but I don't see any in the report. Is that wanted? Ciao -- Luigi
Re: kf6 vs. kf5 conflict report
Salut, Conflict reports are now available form neon ci and can be triggered by yourself. They are usually lagging a day behind as automatic binary builds only occur once a day. Notable changes from last time are that ECM is skipped as a whole and locale conflicts have been resolved. Much smaller file now :) https://build.neon.kde.org/view/testy/job/test_kf6_deconflictor/ HS
Reminder: KF6 Meeting
Hello everyone, please remember the KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET: https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem Topics and notes are collected here: https://invent.kde.org/teams/frameworks-devs/kf6-workboard/-/issues/33 Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Which name for the kirigami pot file in KF6?
Luigi Toscano ha scritto: > Hi, > > while renaming the translation templates files (mainly from "*5*" to "*6*"), > I've found an exception: the translation template of kirigami is called > libkirigami2plugin_qt(.pot), without the usual 5. > > Which name should we use for the KF6 version? I guess kirigami is going to > stay kirigami 2, so it can't be libkirigami3plugin_qt. Should we just for > libkirigami2plugin6_qt? > Discussed here: https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/2023-March/123176.html tl;dr libkirigami6_qt -- Luigi
