Re: portal drag and drop helpers and where to put them

On Mittwoch, 6. April 2022 13:28:50 CEST Harald Sitter wrote: > https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kcoreaddons/-/merge_requests/212 > > To get sandboxed apps to work with drag and drop we need to have drags > take a roundtrip through xdg-desktop-portal and unfortunately enough > that needs to

KF6 meeting notes 2022-04-12

https://invent.kde.org/teams/frameworks-devs/kf6-workboard/-/issues/3 https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kconfigwidgets/-/merge_requests/131 - needs review/feedback - interesting part is openColorScheme() in kcolorschemehelpers_p.h - existing benchmark in the tests shows no change - might not work

Reminder: KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CEST: https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem Topics are collected here: https://invent.kde.org/teams/frameworks-devs/kf6-workboard/-/issues/3 Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Reminder: KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CEST: https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem Topics are collected here: https://invent.kde.org/teams/frameworks-devs/kf6-workboard/-/issues/1 Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: Unit tests all pass in Jenkins on Linux

On Montag, 21. März 2022 17:31:42 CET Volker Krause wrote: > On Sonntag, 13. März 2022 16:40:54 CET David Faure wrote: > > After the recent discussions on state of CI, I fixed the last unittest > > failures (kio, purpose... + apol fixed ECM) so that > > https://build.kde.or

Re: Unit tests all pass in Jenkins on Linux

On Sonntag, 13. März 2022 16:40:54 CET David Faure wrote: > After the recent discussions on state of CI, I fixed the last unittest > failures (kio, purpose... + apol fixed ECM) so that > https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/view/Platform%20-%20SUSEQt5.15/ is all > green^H^Hblue again. > Please

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

KF6 meeting notes 2022-03-08

Short meeting due to the Plasma 6 spring covering a lot already during the weekend. https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kwayland/-/merge_requests/52 - blocks kwayland-server/plasma-workspace - should we maybe as a first step just add the extra folder level and leave the upper/lower case split

Re: CI Repairs

On Dienstag, 8. März 2022 08:54:38 CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > This evening i've repaired several issues that were causing builds to fail > on the main Jenkins CI system. This includes a broken Windows builder > (causing Windows builds to periodically fail) and a hung FreeBSD builder > (which was

KF6 meeting notes 2022-03-01

https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/syntax-highlighting/-/issues/18 - this is introduced by using lower-case namespace folder names, which we didn't do in frameworks so far - only issues a warning, doesn't break the build - possible solution would be to not use lower-case namespace folder names,

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

KF6 meeting notes 2022-02-22

Should we retire the QMake support for KF6? - plan is to drop after branching, unless somebody steps up to maintain this https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/plasma-framework/-/merge_requests/452 - needs feedback, the approach discussed two weeks ago wasn't entirely applicable due to QXcbWindow not

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

D7274: Allow to only build the kauth-policy-gen code generator

vkrause added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > kossebau wrote in CMakeLists.txt:91 > This installs KF5AuthTargets.cmake based on the condition, but > KF5AuthConfig.cmake still includes the target file unconditionally, so cmake > would fail over missing the file when using

KF6 meeting notes 2022-02-08

https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kiconthemes/-/merge_requests/55 - reviewed https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kcoreaddons/-/merge_requests/192 - reviewed https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kio/-/merge_requests/693#note_394308 - would make the macro prefix inconsistent with the export macros

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

KF6 meeting notes 2022-02-01

Plasma 6 sprint - https://doodle.com/poll/nvdyzp979y8dvfyd https://invent.kde.org/plasma/drkonqi/-/merge_requests/51 - does Plasma want to use versioned or version-less targets? -> we use version-less targets outside of Frameworks https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kwayland/-/merge_requests/52 -

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

KF6 meeting notes 2022-01-25

https://phabricator.kde.org/T15127#269860 (build status): - limited progress, Kirigami is the main blocker now - should we ifdef out the blocking shader stuff to unblock dependent modules? -> yes https://phabricator.kde.org/T15232 (unit test status): - good progress, only 9 regressions compared

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Maintainers of KDE Frameworks for the Windows platform?

On Montag, 24. Januar 2022 01:00:03 CET Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > in the past it was hard to find someone to fix things for KDE Frameworks on > Windows, and too often people not interested in Windows had instead to spend > their costly leisure time to solve problems, e.g. by debugging via

Re: Gitlab CI: failed unit tests vs. currently passing CI

Important topic, thanks for bringing this up! On Samstag, 22. Januar 2022 01:31:13 CET Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Bhushan gave two first ideas just now on #kde-sysadmin: > > Well we can add a switch that repos can commit to saying test failure is > > build failure > > > Another

KF6 meeting notes 2022-01-18

https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/extra-cmake-modules/-/merge_requests/223 - so https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/extra-cmake-modules/-/merge_requests/ 222 instead after all? - anyone wants to approve that? :) - once this is in, we need to review the state of unit tests for all frameworks again

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

KF6 meeting notes 2022-01-11

https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kio/-/merge_requests/700 - ship it, can be used everywhere https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kservice/-/merge_requests/79 - can we do this now in all frameworks, or wait one KF release for fallout? - can be done now for all frameworks

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Includes (was: Re: KF6 meeting notes 2022-01-04)

On Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022 19:41:45 CET Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022, 18:07:45 CET schrieb Volker Krause: > > - in some places includes with the framework prefix don't seem to work > > anymore (ie. vs ), any idea where those extra > > inc

KF6 meeting notes 2022-01-04

https://phabricator.kde.org/T15127 (Qt6 build status update): - 60+ modules build - Kate (without plugins) with Breeze style and platform file dialogs mostly working - Kirigami might not be doable without branching (Button.icon, QtGraphicalEffects) - CI setup in progress - in some places

Re: Future of libksane

On Montag, 3. Januar 2022 21:14:56 CET Kåre Särs wrote: > At the time of porting to KF5, I did not pursue Frameworks integration, > because I wanted this split to be done first. Now that the split is > (almost) done I'm wondering if it would be a good time/idea to turn them > into KDE Frameworks

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

KF6 meeting notes 2021-12-28

https://phabricator.kde.org/T15127 - progressed to the point that we have a mostly working KWrite - there's still a few pending reviews - we need a proper solution for QTextCodec (Ahmad has a potential/partial solution for ktexteditor, MR upcoming) - Kirigami's custom items need work: Nico might

KF6 meeting notes 2021-12-14

https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/ki18n/-/merge_requests/41#note_354970 - alternatives approaches to doing this (branching, local-only changes, doing nothing) are all considered worse, so agreement is to integrate these changes

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

KF6 meeting notes 2021-12-07

https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/2021-December/119935.html - tricky to find a mentor so far - good tasks become available after branching, but that might not happen in time https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kcoreaddons/-/merge_requests/157 - merged - apply the same approach to

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

KF6 meeting notes 2021-11-30

https://phabricator.kde.org/T11635 - very likely unused, but hard to verify - grep finds a few users though - deprecate, add a runtime deprecation warning https://phabricator.kde.org/T13134 - QNetworkInterface in 6.3 seems to cover all we need now https://phabricator.kde.org/T12122 - removing

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

KF6 meeting notes 2021-11-23

https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kcoreaddons/-/merge_requests/149 * needs input by Nico https://phabricator.kde.org/T13924 * unused private class inheritance infrastructure can be removed at any time without breaking ABI

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Fwd: KDE CI: Administration » Dependency Build Applications kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 127 - Still Failing!

On Donnerstag, 18. November 2021 18:47:37 CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 6:39 AM Volker Krause wrote: > > I looked into this and it seems the problem had already been addressed > > prior > > to your email, so all I ended up doing is pressi

Re: Fwd: KDE CI: Administration » Dependency Build Applications kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 127 - Still Failing!

On Donnerstag, 18. November 2021 19:39:09 CET Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 18. November 2021, 18:37:37 CET schrieb Volker Krause: > > I looked into this and it seems the problem had already been addressed > > prior to your email, so all I ended up doing is press

Re: Fwd: KDE CI: Administration » Dependency Build Applications kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 127 - Still Failing!

I looked into this and it seems the problem had already been addressed prior to your email, so all I ended up doing is pressing the rebuild button. The change starting this was https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/ki18n/-/ merge_requests/21, by me. What actually caused the breakage however was the

KF6 meeting notes 2021-11-09

[Davids: please look for the items needing your input :)] https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/extra-cmake-modules/-/merge_requests/142 * what's the status of this? * important for enabling Qt6 builds, so would be good to get in * David F?

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

KF6 meeting notes 2021-11-09

https://phabricator.kde.org/T12101 * we want QKeyChain as the consumer API (port in progress) * there's a pending merge request to add secret service API to KWallet -> move to in progress https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/purpose/-/issues/1 * Purpose has a very generic API, but currently only

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hello everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 17:00 CET, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: What is our plan for Qt6 and QXmlPatterns?

On Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2021 10:01:41 CEST Christoph Cullmann (cullmann.io) wrote: > On 2021-10-28 08:32, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote: > > Hi Albert > > > > Can i raise the questions on all valid possible solutions ? > > > > - Maintain qxmlpattern on our side > > - Move to libxslt > > -

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-10-26

On Dienstag, 26. Oktober 2021 22:09:02 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dimarts, 26 d’octubre de 2021, a les 18:05:42 (CEST), Volker Krause va escriure: > > !! Meeting will move to 17:00 CET next week (due to DST change in > > continental Europe) > > > > Threaded

KF6 meeting notes 2021-10-26

!! Meeting will move to 17:00 CET next week (due to DST change in continental Europe) https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kcoreaddons/-/merge_requests/149 * static plugin support draft, needs review * MRs to demonstrate the usage exists for KWin and KMyMoney

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting moved to Tuesday!

Hi everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 15:00 UTC / 17:00 CEST, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, VolkerBEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//K Desktop Environment//NONSGML libkcal 4.3//EN VERSION:2.0 X-KDE-ICAL-IMPLEMENTATION-VERSION:1.0 METHOD:REQUEST

KF6 meeting notes 2021-10-19

* https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kservice/-/merge_requests/60#note_323530 Does it make sense to be specific about the deprecating the different constructors? * https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kcoreaddons/-/commits/work/ kcoreaddons_static_plugin Review/testing needed. *

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting moved to Tuesday!

Hi everyone, please note the weekly KF6 meeting has been moved to Tuesday 15:00 UTC / 17:00 CEST, on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! A new iCal event is attached. Thank you, VolkerBEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//K Desktop Environment//NONSGML libkcal 4.3//EN VERSION:2.0

KF6 meeting notes 2021-10-11

!! Changing the meeting time: - Monday conflicts with Alex's new university schedule and is difficult for David F, would Tuesday at the same time work for everyone instead? -> moved to Tuesday starting next week KF6 Timeline - Plasma needs to know for release planning for 2022 - possible

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hi everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting, every Monday 15:00 UTC / 17:00 CEST on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! And in case you don't know what to do until then, there's a huge review backlog for Frameworks that would benefit from your help :)

KF6 meeting notes 2021-10-04

!! More reviews needed: - https://invent.kde.org/dashboard/merge_requests? scope=all=opened_username=alex - https://invent.kde.org/dashboard/merge_requests? scope=all=opened_username=ahmadsamir KIO slave on hold feature: - not needed anymore for passing to another application, but still needed

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hi everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting, every Monday 15:00 UTC / 17:00 CEST on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! As per popular request there's also an iCal event for these meetings attached. Thank you, VolkerBEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//K Desktop Environment//NONSGML libkcal

KF6 meeting notes 2021-09-27

https://phabricator.kde.org/T12212 * search providers are used by apps, not just Plasma, so the move to Plasma seems wrong * David E doesn't remember creating the task, now considered a bad idea https://phabricator.kde.org/T12098 * not a kf6 blocker, could happen later

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hi everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting, every Monday 15:00 UTC / 17:00 CEST on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Extending the license policy to include ODbL-1.0

done On Mittwoch, 22. September 2021 23:20:56 CEST Alexander Potashev wrote: > Thanks! > > Could you please update the changelog section > https://community.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy#Changelog ? > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 5:38 PM Volker Krause wrote: > > Tha

Re: Extending the license policy to include ODbL-1.0

Thanks everyone, I've added the suggested change to the wiki now. Regards, Volker On Mittwoch, 15. September 2021 17:26:57 CEST Volker Krause wrote: > Hi, > > there's a MR [1] for ki18n containing data tables generated from OSM data, > which implies the ODbL-1.0 license [2]. We

Re: QML API docs for C++ wrapper types?

On Sonntag, 19. September 2021 19:43:46 CEST Carl Schwan wrote: > Le vendredi 17 septembre 2021 à 3:23 PM, Volker Krause a écrit : > > Hi, > > do we have an example somewhere how to do API docs markup properly for C++ > > wrappers for QML APIs? > > I don't think

KF6 meeting notes 2021-09-21

Short meeting due to an acute David insufficiency, mainly discussion licensing issues. What to do about files without any license header at all? - ask everyone - for trivial files we can just add a CC0-1.0 license - can we assume the LICENSE file from a top-level folder applies as well? might

QML API docs for C++ wrapper types?

Hi, do we have an example somewhere how to do API docs markup properly for C++ wrappers for QML APIs? Thinking about cases like these: https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/knotifications/-/merge_requests/49/ diffs#aa15f1228c0fb7ecaaa96bb9d8d843ef37033c2b_0_12

Extending the license policy to include ODbL-1.0

Hi, there's a MR [1] for ki18n containing data tables generated from OSM data, which implies the ODbL-1.0 license [2]. We also already have other places ([3], [4]) actually doing this. However that's a license not yet covered by our license policy, so I suggest we add it. ODbL is essentially

KF6 meeting notes 2021-09-13

Workboard clarification: - Needs Input is for tasks needing discussion in the weekly meeting - In Discussion was created during a sprint and should not be used outside of a sprint https://phabricator.kde.org/T12549 - do we need a KConfigXT extension for a setting/state separation? -> yes --

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hi everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting, every Monday 15:00 UTC / 17:00 CEST on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem! I'm sure you don't want to let poor Alex end up all alone in the meeting room with all his burning questions blocking his Frameworks work going unanswered again, do

KF6 meeting notes 2021-08-30

* https://phabricator.kde.org/T14312 - plugin loading is using a struct for this, so we consider this lower priority for now. * should we have a "nice to have" column on the work board? * https://phabricator.kde.org/T14784 - seems never set/used, so can be removed. *

Reminder: Weekly KF6 Meeting

Hi everyone, please remember the weekly KF6 meeting, every Monday 15:00 UTC / 17:00 CEST on https://meet.kde.org/b/ada-mi8-aem. Attendance during the last two weeks was minimal unfortunately, hopefully just due to vacation time for many of you. Thank you, Volker signature.asc Description:

KF6 meeting notes 2021-08-02

* https://phabricator.kde.org/T13056: Technically not a KF task, and solved itself by moving away from KAboutData. * https://phabricator.kde.org/T14564: There are a number of good reasons to consistently use JSON files, desktop files for editing might be nicer, but those files are rarely

KF6 meeting notes 2021-07-19

Topics remaining from last week: * Raising the Qt minimum version to 5.15.2: https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/ kde-frameworks-devel/2021-July/118039.html * STL use in KF implementation: https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kio/-/ merge_requests/484 * Friedrich's alternative ECM branching proposal:

KF6 meeting notes 2021-07-12

Hi, apparently many people who voted for Monday 15:00 UTC as the new meeting time didn't get the memo yet that this is the new meeting time now ;-) So here's mainly topics that we weren't able to discuss and that we then need to cover next week (unless they resolve themselves on the mailing

KService as a platform abstraction framework?

Hi, while looking at implementing a pretty straightforward KApplicationTrader/ KIO::ApplicationLauncherJob use ([1]) for Android, I found myself wondering whether we should have an Android backend for KService. KService conceptually matches android.content.pm.PackageManager/PackageInfo [2, 3],

KF6 Akademy BoF Notes 2021-06-21

KF6 BoF Akademy Notes 2021-06-21 Topics: - how to continue and when to branch for a Qt 6 port - implications of Kevin's talk - better time for the weekly call - better priorities on the task board Branching: - Plasma and things depending on shadertools/RHI would like this to be done earlier

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-12

On Freitag, 18. Juni 2021 22:27:40 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Friday, 18 June 2021 15:21:07 CEST Volker Krause wrote: > > Added now, Monday 09:00 UTC. > > OK, I will show up only at 10 though. I can't do 9. oh, sorry, I did this from the top of my head ("Monday morning

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-12

On Freitag, 18. Juni 2021 15:01:00 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > On Tuesday, 15 June 2021 18:17:27 CEST Volker Krause wrote: > > On Dienstag, 15. Juni 2021 12:45:21 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > > > David Faure ha scritto: > > > > On dimanche 13 juin 20

Re: KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-12

On Dienstag, 15. Juni 2021 12:45:21 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > David Faure ha scritto: > > On dimanche 13 juin 2021 20:32:42 CEST Luigi Toscano wrote: > >> -> we need need input about dfaure presence and try to avoid conflicts > >> with > >> Plasma BoFs > > > > I'm available Mon-Thu, but since

KF6 meeting notes 2021-06-05

Hi all, here are the notes from today's KF6 weekly call: C++ 17 - can we use std::optional in public API? KPluginLoader has that need - we need to keep source compatibility with older KF5, so unconditional C++17 includes can be a problem during the remaining KF5 lifetime (but not for KF6) -

Re: KDE Frameworks 6 - Virtual Sprint setup

On Freitag, 29. Januar 2021 15:57:59 CET Adam Szopa wrote: > Hello, > I've been talking with David Faure about setting up a Sprint focused on KF6 > work. Some of the topics would include: > - Reviewing the KF6 board > (https://phabricator.kde.org/project/board/310/[1]): -- Clean up > -- Tagging

Re: KDE Frameworks 6 - Virtual Sprint setup

On Freitag, 29. Januar 2021 15:57:59 CET Adam Szopa wrote: > Hello, > I've been talking with David Faure about setting up a Sprint focused on KF6 > work. Some of the topics would include: > - Reviewing the KF6 board > (https://phabricator.kde.org/project/board/310/[1]): -- Clean up > -- Tagging

Re: KDE review for KWeatherCore

On Samstag, 2. Januar 2021 12:44:31 CET Dominik Haumann wrote: > This is just by looking at the first two header files. > > Looking at WeatherForecast.cpp: > > double maxTemp = std::numeric_limits::min(); > double minTemp = std::numeric_limits::max(); > > Initializing the temperature to

Re: KDE review for KWeatherCore

Having implemented the weather support for Itinerary, rebasing that onto a more comprehensive framework would indeed be welcome :) I haven't looked too deeply at the implementation or the API yet, most of the feedback below is based on things learned when implementing this for Itinerary. ##

Re: RFC: Switching to min Qt version 5.14 for KF on December 14th

On Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2020 14:20:47 CET Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > you might have seen I asked* whether anyone knows a real world requirement > to stick with Qt 5.13 as new current minimum required Qt version for > current KF releases. So far no-one had to report a reason to support Qt >=

Re: KUserFeedback => Frameworks?

On Freitag, 9. Oktober 2020 21:17:42 CEST Christoph Cullmann wrote: > On 2020-09-26 21:52, Christoph Cullmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > is there any real reason why KUserFeedback is yet no official > > framework? > > > > I just stumbled over this during my try to add it as dependency for > > the

Re: Dropping the moderation by default flag

On Tuesday, 21 July 2020 21:16:00 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Hi, this list has an unusual setting [for kde mailing lists] inherited from > kde-core-devel that is that even subscribed people get moderated, and then > the list moderator can decide to clear the moderate flag for each person >

D29747: Deprecate AbstractBarcode::minimumSize() also for the compiler

vkrause accepted this revision. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. REPOSITORY R280 Prison BRANCH fullydeprecateminimumsize REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D29747 To: kossebau, #frameworks, svuorela, vkrause Cc: kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack, michaelh,

Re: Shift for parts of the CI system to Qt 5.15

On Saturday, 20 June 2020 08:20:18 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi all, > > This weekend parts of our CI system shifted to using Qt 5.15, with all > FreeBSD builds now being based on Qt 5.15. We also shifted all Linux > builds of Plasma, and the latest Qt version build of Frameworks to Qt > 5.15 as

Re: New Framework Review: KDAV

with this! Volker On Sunday, 14 June 2020 11:53:42 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 14 de juny de 2020, a les 10:17:01 CEST, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 8:03 PM Volker Krause wrote: > > > With both 20.04.2 and 5.71.0 out I think it's now ti

Re: New Framework Review: KDAV

On Friday, 19 June 2020 01:16:20 CEST Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Am Samstag, 4. April 2020, 16:20:21 CEST schrieb Kevin Ottens: > > Overall apidox would likely need a big pass of cleanups as well. > > I locally prepared the addition of ECMAddQch usage for KDAV tonight, and > while testing

Re: New Framework Review: KDAV

move this in Gitlab? Thanks, Volker On Sunday, 24 May 2020 08:52:17 CEST Volker Krause wrote: > The remaining issues that didn't change ABI anymore (movable value types, > hide private methods/slots inside the private classes, etc) have long since > been addressed. > > I th

D29747: Deprecate AbstractBarcode::minimumSize() also for the compiler

vkrause added a comment. PIM has been fully adapted meanwhile, only https://phabricator.kde.org/D29478 missing I think. REPOSITORY R280 Prison REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D29747 To: kossebau, #frameworks, svuorela, vkrause Cc: kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack,

Re: New Framework Review: KDAV

. * For the July release, just in time for the 20.08 dependency freeze. Opinions? Thanks, Volker On Saturday, 4 April 2020 17:32:19 CEST Volker Krause wrote: > Thanks for the review! We are cutting it close again with the 20.04 > deadline, but fortunately most of these findings aren't ABI-br

Re: KEmoticons, emoticons kcm

On Saturday, 23 May 2020 02:49:57 CEST Aleix Pol wrote: > I was looking through some Plasma code and I saw that we have some > fairly old emoticons KCM using KF5Emoticons. > > Now while I know why this exists, it feels like it's more of a thing > of the past from when people wrote :) instead of

D29358: Implement lock-screen visibility control on Android

vkrause closed this revision. REPOSITORY R289 KNotifications REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D29358 To: vkrause, nicolasfella Cc: kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack, michaelh, ngraham, bruns

D29358: Implement lock-screen visibility control on Android

vkrause updated this revision to Diff 83104. vkrause added a comment. Rename visibility hint. REPOSITORY R289 KNotifications CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE https://phabricator.kde.org/D29358?vs=81734=83104 BRANCH pending REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D29358 AFFECTED FILES

D29358: Implement lock-screen visibility control on Android

vkrause added a comment. ping? REPOSITORY R289 KNotifications REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D29358 To: vkrause Cc: kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack, michaelh, ngraham, bruns

D29335: Implement notification grouping on Android

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit R289:942bddded289: Implement notification grouping on Android (authored by vkrause). CHANGED PRIOR TO COMMIT https://phabricator.kde.org/D29335?vs=81731=83063#toc REPOSITORY R289 KNotifications

D29357: Display rich text notification messages on Android

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit R289:c14be41192d2: Display rich text notification messages on Android (authored by vkrause). CHANGED PRIOR TO COMMIT https://phabricator.kde.org/D29357?vs=82566=83046#toc REPOSITORY R289

D27989: Add a new set of barcode size functions

vkrause added a comment. In D27989#670416 , @kossebau wrote: > > minimumSize() becomes deprecated by this, the deprecation macros will > > follow once the current users have been adjusted. > > IMHO you should add the macros from the start,

D29357: Display rich text notification messages on Android

vkrause retitled this revision from "Display rich text notification messages on Android (API level 24+)" to "Display rich text notification messages on Android". REPOSITORY R289 KNotifications BRANCH rich-text REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D29357 To: vkrause, tfella Cc:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >