Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-08-22 Thread Christoph Cullmann

On 2020-08-22 00:25, David Faure wrote:

Hi Christoph,

As part of my continuous effort to keep the KF5 CI "green", I
submitted a MR for skipping the crashing tests if Qt is <= 5.15.0 :
https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/ktexteditor/-/merge_requests/18


The question is: does that help? For me it even crashs with 5.15.0, as
Simon's relevant patches are not inside that release.

And I thought I would have seen CI crashs with the Qt 5.15 build, too.



But please note that there's also this actual regression:

https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/ktexteditor/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/35/testReport/junit/projectroot/autotests/kateindenttest_testRuby/

Reproduced locally:

---
/d/kde/src/5/frameworks/ktexteditor/autotests/input/indent/ruby/regexp1/expected
   2016-12-14 23:10:25.350229001 +0100
+++
/d/kde/src/5/frameworks/ktexteditor/autotests/input/indent/ruby/regexp1/actual
 2020-08-22 00:11:35.284997275 +0200
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
   rx =~ /^hello/
-  foo
+  foo

FAIL!  : IndentTest::testRuby(regexp1) Compared values are not the same
   Actual   (diff.exitCode()): 1
   Expected (EXIT_SUCCESS)   : 0
   Loc:
[/d/kde/src/5/frameworks/ktexteditor/autotests/src/script_test_base.cpp(153)]

Can you have a look, or forward to someone who can?


I think I will mark this one test just as XFAIL, as I think nobody has 
time to hunt when this

regression went in.

Greetings
Christoph



Cheers,
David.

On lundi 6 juillet 2020 16:28:27 CEST Christoph Cullmann wrote:

Hi,

this shows again a different V4 GC error :/

==3342==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 
0x0028

(pc 0x7f58d0bb98ec bp 0x615f8000 sp 0x7ffe976de5f0 T0)
==3342==The signal is caused by a READ memory access.
==3342==Hint: address points to the zero page.
 #0 0x7f58d0bb98ec in QV4::MarkStack::drain()
(/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb28ec)
 #1 0x7f58d0bba1e4 in QV4::MemoryManager::mark()
(/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb31e4)
 #2 0x7f58d0bbc37d  (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb537d)
 #3 0x7f58d0bbdb87 in QV4::MemoryManager::allocData(unsigned long)
(/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb6b87)
 #4 0x7f58d0bbdbe2 in
QV4::MemoryManager::allocObjectWithMemberData(QV4::VTable const*,
unsigned int) (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb6be2)
 #5 0x7f58d0cd10f0 in
QV4::Runtime::CreateMappedArgumentsObject::call(QV4::ExecutionEngine*)
(/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0x1ca0f0)
 #6 0x7f58bc65b06d  (/memfd:JITCode:QtQml (deleted)+0x6d)

:( Thought 5.15 would have all needed fixes.

Greetings
Christoph

On 2020-07-05 15:47, CI System wrote:
> BUILD UNSTABLE
>
> Build URL
>
>
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/ktexteditor/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQ
>t5.15/4/>
> Project:
>kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15
>
> Date of build:
>Sun, 05 Jul 2020 13:40:03 +
>
> Build duration:
>7 min 46 sec and counting
>
> BUILD ARTIFACTS
>
>* abi-compatibility-results.yaml [1]
>* acc/KF5TextEditor-5.72.0.xml [2]
>* compat_reports/KF5TextEditor_compat_report.html [3]
>* logs/KF5TextEditor/5.72.0/log.txt [4]
>
> JUnit Tests
>
>Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0
>
> test(s), Total: 1 test(s)
>
>Name: projectroot Failed: 3 test(s), Passed: 59 test(s), Skipped: 0
>
> test(s), Total: 62 test(s)
>
>* Failed: projectroot.autotests.bug313759
>
>* Failed: projectroot.autotests.kateindenttest_testAda
>
>* Failed: projectroot.autotests.kateindenttest_testPascal
>
>Name: projectroot.autotests.src Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 5
>
> test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 5 test(s)
>
> Cobertura Report
>
> Project Coverage Summary
>
> Name
>
>Packages
>Files
>Classes
>Lines
>Conditionals
>
>Cobertura Coverage Report
>79% (22/28)
>85% (262/307)
>85% (262/307)
>67% (33050/49269)
>49% (14779/30050)
>
>Coverage Breakdown by Package
>
> Name
>
>Files
>Classes
>Lines
>Conditionals
>
>autotests.src
>97% (37/38)
>97% (37/38)
>93% (4798/5140)
>49% (1812/3680)
>
>autotests.src.vimode
>100% (9/9)
>100% (9/9)
>99% (5528/5570)
>58% (984/1708)
>
>src.buffer
>88% (15/17)
>88% (15/17)
>89% (1677/1892)
>74% (1078/1464)
>
>src.completion
>100% (11/11)
>100% (11/11)
>57% (1788/3134)
>42% (1009/2425)
>
>src.completion.expandingtree
>100% (3/3)
>100% (3/3)
>40% (182/457)
>21% (73/340)
>
>src.dialogs
>0% (0/4)
>0% (0/4)
>

Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-08-21 Thread David Faure
Hi Christoph,

As part of my continuous effort to keep the KF5 CI "green", I submitted a MR 
for skipping the crashing tests if Qt is <= 5.15.0 : 
https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/ktexteditor/-/merge_requests/18

But please note that there's also this actual regression:

https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/ktexteditor/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/35/testReport/junit/projectroot/autotests/kateindenttest_testRuby/

Reproduced locally:

--- 
/d/kde/src/5/frameworks/ktexteditor/autotests/input/indent/ruby/regexp1/expected
2016-12-14 23:10:25.350229001 +0100
+++ 
/d/kde/src/5/frameworks/ktexteditor/autotests/input/indent/ruby/regexp1/actual  
2020-08-22 00:11:35.284997275 +0200
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
   rx =~ /^hello/
-  foo
+  foo

FAIL!  : IndentTest::testRuby(regexp1) Compared values are not the same
   Actual   (diff.exitCode()): 1
   Expected (EXIT_SUCCESS)   : 0
   Loc: 
[/d/kde/src/5/frameworks/ktexteditor/autotests/src/script_test_base.cpp(153)]

Can you have a look, or forward to someone who can?

Cheers,
David.

On lundi 6 juillet 2020 16:28:27 CEST Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this shows again a different V4 GC error :/
> 
> ==3342==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0028
> (pc 0x7f58d0bb98ec bp 0x615f8000 sp 0x7ffe976de5f0 T0)
> ==3342==The signal is caused by a READ memory access.
> ==3342==Hint: address points to the zero page.
>  #0 0x7f58d0bb98ec in QV4::MarkStack::drain()
> (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb28ec)
>  #1 0x7f58d0bba1e4 in QV4::MemoryManager::mark()
> (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb31e4)
>  #2 0x7f58d0bbc37d  (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb537d)
>  #3 0x7f58d0bbdb87 in QV4::MemoryManager::allocData(unsigned long)
> (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb6b87)
>  #4 0x7f58d0bbdbe2 in
> QV4::MemoryManager::allocObjectWithMemberData(QV4::VTable const*,
> unsigned int) (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb6be2)
>  #5 0x7f58d0cd10f0 in
> QV4::Runtime::CreateMappedArgumentsObject::call(QV4::ExecutionEngine*)
> (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0x1ca0f0)
>  #6 0x7f58bc65b06d  (/memfd:JITCode:QtQml (deleted)+0x6d)
> 
> :( Thought 5.15 would have all needed fixes.
> 
> Greetings
> Christoph
> 
> On 2020-07-05 15:47, CI System wrote:
> > BUILD UNSTABLE
> > 
> >  Build URL
> > 
> > 
> > https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/ktexteditor/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQ
> > t5.15/4/>   
> >  Project:
> > kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15
> > 
> >  Date of build:
> > Sun, 05 Jul 2020 13:40:03 +
> > 
> >  Build duration:
> > 7 min 46 sec and counting
> > 
> >  BUILD ARTIFACTS
> > 
> > * abi-compatibility-results.yaml [1]
> > * acc/KF5TextEditor-5.72.0.xml [2]
> > * compat_reports/KF5TextEditor_compat_report.html [3]
> > * logs/KF5TextEditor/5.72.0/log.txt [4]
> > 
> >  JUnit Tests
> > 
> > Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0
> > 
> > test(s), Total: 1 test(s)
> > 
> > Name: projectroot Failed: 3 test(s), Passed: 59 test(s), 
> > Skipped: 0
> > 
> > test(s), Total: 62 test(s)
> > 
> > * Failed: projectroot.autotests.bug313759
> > 
> > * Failed: projectroot.autotests.kateindenttest_testAda
> > 
> > * Failed: projectroot.autotests.kateindenttest_testPascal
> > 
> > Name: projectroot.autotests.src Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 5
> > 
> > test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 5 test(s)
> > 
> >  Cobertura Report
> >  
> >  Project Coverage Summary
> >  
> >  Name
> > 
> > Packages
> > Files
> > Classes
> > Lines
> > Conditionals
> > 
> > Cobertura Coverage Report
> > 79% (22/28)
> > 85% (262/307)
> > 85% (262/307)
> > 67% (33050/49269)
> > 49% (14779/30050)
> > 
> > Coverage Breakdown by Package
> > 
> >  Name
> > 
> > Files
> > Classes
> > Lines
> > Conditionals
> > 
> > autotests.src
> > 97% (37/38)
> > 97% (37/38)
> > 93% (4798/5140)
> > 49% (1812/3680)
> > 
> > autotests.src.vimode
> > 100% (9/9)
> > 100% (9/9)
> > 99% (5528/5570)
> > 58% (984/1708)
> > 
> > src.buffer
> > 88% (15/17)
> > 88% (15/17)
> > 89% (1677/1892)
> > 74% (1078/1464)
> > 
> > src.completion
> > 100% (11/11)
> > 100% (11/11)
> > 57% (1788/3134)
> > 42% (1009/2425)
> > 
> > 

Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-11 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 3:23 AM Christoph Cullmann
 wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-09 10:03, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> > On 2020-07-08 00:07, David Faure wrote:
> >> On mardi 7 juillet 2020 17:58:26 CEST Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> >>> On 2020-07-07 12:16, David Faure wrote:
> >>> > Yep :(
> >>> >
> >>> > You'll tell Simon and/or QTBUG-*?
> >>>
> >>> I will take a look if I can find some existing bug or open a new.
> >>>
> >>> Simon left Qt, or?
> >>
> >> Yes but I think that was already the case when he fixed the last one
> >> :-)
> >
> > I did so some research.
> >
> > Might this be fixed by
> >
> > https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtdeclarative.git/commit/src/qml?h=5.15=082247604219316035484cfdc83662936df2edb5
> >
> > or
> >
> > https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtdeclarative.git/commit/src/qml?h=5.15=082247604219316035484cfdc83662936df2edb5
> >
> > At least the backtraces in the referenced bugs look similar.
> >
> > That isn't in 5.15?
> >
> > Is there a chance to have the CI use some Qt with these backported?
> > (or is it already and it is a different issue?)
>
> I talked with Simon and very likely these commits in the 5.15 branch
> would fix our issues.
>
> Is there a change to get a patched Qt for the CI?

This is not exactly straight forward, but would be possible for Linux at least.
Windows would require they be adopted by Craft, and FreeBSD by the KDE
FreeBSD folks.

>
> If that fixes it, actually, it would be highly important to get these
> fixes in the distro Qt packages,
> otherwise all of KDE that uses the QJSEngine (or QML) will just randomly
> crash.

If SUSE pick up the patches, then the CI system will automatically
pick them up as we use OpenSUSE for the Linux CI images.

>
> Greetings
> Christoph

Regards,
Ben

>
> > Greetings
> > Christoph
>
> --
> Ignorance is bliss...
> https://cullmann.io | https://kate-editor.org


Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-11 Thread Christoph Cullmann

On 2020-07-09 10:03, Christoph Cullmann wrote:

On 2020-07-08 00:07, David Faure wrote:

On mardi 7 juillet 2020 17:58:26 CEST Christoph Cullmann wrote:

On 2020-07-07 12:16, David Faure wrote:
> Yep :(
>
> You'll tell Simon and/or QTBUG-*?

I will take a look if I can find some existing bug or open a new.

Simon left Qt, or?


Yes but I think that was already the case when he fixed the last one 
:-)


I did so some research.

Might this be fixed by

https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtdeclarative.git/commit/src/qml?h=5.15=082247604219316035484cfdc83662936df2edb5

or

https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtdeclarative.git/commit/src/qml?h=5.15=082247604219316035484cfdc83662936df2edb5

At least the backtraces in the referenced bugs look similar.

That isn't in 5.15?

Is there a chance to have the CI use some Qt with these backported?
(or is it already and it is a different issue?)


I talked with Simon and very likely these commits in the 5.15 branch 
would fix our issues.


Is there a change to get a patched Qt for the CI?

If that fixes it, actually, it would be highly important to get these 
fixes in the distro Qt packages,
otherwise all of KDE that uses the QJSEngine (or QML) will just randomly 
crash.


Greetings
Christoph


Greetings
Christoph


--
Ignorance is bliss...
https://cullmann.io | https://kate-editor.org


Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-09 Thread Christoph Cullmann

On 2020-07-08 00:07, David Faure wrote:

On mardi 7 juillet 2020 17:58:26 CEST Christoph Cullmann wrote:

On 2020-07-07 12:16, David Faure wrote:
> Yep :(
>
> You'll tell Simon and/or QTBUG-*?

I will take a look if I can find some existing bug or open a new.

Simon left Qt, or?


Yes but I think that was already the case when he fixed the last one 
:-)


I did so some research.

Might this be fixed by

https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtdeclarative.git/commit/src/qml?h=5.15=082247604219316035484cfdc83662936df2edb5

or

https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtdeclarative.git/commit/src/qml?h=5.15=082247604219316035484cfdc83662936df2edb5

At least the backtraces in the referenced bugs look similar.

That isn't in 5.15?

Is there a chance to have the CI use some Qt with these backported?
(or is it already and it is a different issue?)

Greetings
Christoph

--
Ignorance is bliss...
https://cullmann.io | https://kate-editor.org


Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-07 Thread David Faure
On mardi 7 juillet 2020 17:58:26 CEST Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> On 2020-07-07 12:16, David Faure wrote:
> > Yep :(
> > 
> > You'll tell Simon and/or QTBUG-*?
> 
> I will take a look if I can find some existing bug or open a new.
> 
> Simon left Qt, or?

Yes but I think that was already the case when he fixed the last one :-)

-- 
David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE Frameworks 5





Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-07 Thread Christoph Cullmann

On 2020-07-07 12:16, David Faure wrote:

Yep :(

You'll tell Simon and/or QTBUG-*?


I will take a look if I can find some existing bug or open a new.

Simon left Qt, or?

Greetings
Christoph



On lundi 6 juillet 2020 16:28:27 CEST Christoph Cullmann wrote:

Hi,

this shows again a different V4 GC error :/

==3342==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 
0x0028

(pc 0x7f58d0bb98ec bp 0x615f8000 sp 0x7ffe976de5f0 T0)
==3342==The signal is caused by a READ memory access.
==3342==Hint: address points to the zero page.
 #0 0x7f58d0bb98ec in QV4::MarkStack::drain()
(/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb28ec)
 #1 0x7f58d0bba1e4 in QV4::MemoryManager::mark()
(/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb31e4)
 #2 0x7f58d0bbc37d  (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb537d)
 #3 0x7f58d0bbdb87 in QV4::MemoryManager::allocData(unsigned long)
(/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb6b87)
 #4 0x7f58d0bbdbe2 in
QV4::MemoryManager::allocObjectWithMemberData(QV4::VTable const*,
unsigned int) (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb6be2)
 #5 0x7f58d0cd10f0 in
QV4::Runtime::CreateMappedArgumentsObject::call(QV4::ExecutionEngine*)
(/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0x1ca0f0)
 #6 0x7f58bc65b06d  (/memfd:JITCode:QtQml (deleted)+0x6d)

:( Thought 5.15 would have all needed fixes.

Greetings
Christoph

On 2020-07-05 15:47, CI System wrote:
> BUILD UNSTABLE
>
> Build URL
>
>https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/ktexteditor/

job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQ

>t5.15/4/>
> Project:
>kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15
>
> Date of build:
>Sun, 05 Jul 2020 13:40:03 +
>
> Build duration:
>7 min 46 sec and counting
>
> BUILD ARTIFACTS
>
>* abi-compatibility-results.yaml [1]
>* acc/KF5TextEditor-5.72.0.xml [2]
>* compat_reports/KF5TextEditor_compat_report.html [3]
>* logs/KF5TextEditor/5.72.0/log.txt [4]
>
> JUnit Tests
>
>Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s),

Skipped: 0

>
> test(s), Total: 1 test(s)
>
>Name: projectroot Failed: 3 test(s), Passed: 59

test(s), Skipped: 0

>
> test(s), Total: 62 test(s)
>
>* Failed: projectroot.autotests.bug313759
>
>* Failed: projectroot.autotests.kateindenttest_testAda
>
>* Failed: projectroot.autotests.kateindenttest_testPascal
>
>Name: projectroot.autotests.src Failed: 0 test(s),

Passed: 5

>
> test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 5 test(s)
>
> Cobertura Report
>
> Project Coverage Summary
>
> Name
>
>Packages
>Files
>Classes
>Lines
>Conditionals
>
>Cobertura Coverage Report
>79% (22/28)
>85% (262/307)
>85% (262/307)
>67% (33050/49269)
>49% (14779/30050)
>
>Coverage Breakdown by Package
>
> Name
>
>Files
>Classes
>Lines
>Conditionals
>
>autotests.src
>97% (37/38)
>97% (37/38)
>93% (4798/5140)
>49% (1812/3680)
>
>autotests.src.vimode
>100% (9/9)
>100% (9/9)
>99% (5528/5570)
>58% (984/1708)
>
>src.buffer
>88% (15/17)
>88% (15/17)
>89% (1677/1892)
>74% (1078/1464)
>
>src.completion
>100% (11/11)
>100% (11/11)
>57% (1788/3134)
>42% (1009/2425)
>
>src.completion.expandingtree
>100% (3/3)
>100% (3/3)
>40% (182/457)
>21% (73/340)
>
>src.dialogs
>0% (0/4)
>0% (0/4)
>0% (0/864)
>0% (0/184)
>
>src.document
>100% (4/4)
>100% (4/4)
>61% (1936/3179)
>48% (1407/2945)
>
>src.export
>0% (0/4)
>0% (0/4)
>0% (0/121)
>0% (0/156)
>
>src.include.ktexteditor
>78% (14/18)
>78% (14/18)
>83% (189/227)
>55% (125/226)
>
>src.inputmode
>100% (8/8)
>100% (8/8)
>63% (192/304)
>51% (39/77)
>
>src.mode
>88% (7/8)
>88% (7/8)
>36% (378/1051)
>16% (146/891)
>
>src.part
>0% (0/1)
>0% (0/1)
>0% (0/7)
>100% (0/0)
>
>src.printing
>0% (0/4)
>0% (0/4)
>0% (0/862)
>0% (0/278)
>
>src.render
>100% (8/8)
>100% (8/8)
>77% (950/1227)
>67% (610/914)
>
>src.schema
>22% (2/9)
>22% (2/9)
>1% (19/1472)
>1% (6/625)
>
>src.script
>94% 

Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-07 Thread David Faure
Yep :(

You'll tell Simon and/or QTBUG-*?

On lundi 6 juillet 2020 16:28:27 CEST Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this shows again a different V4 GC error :/
> 
> ==3342==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0028
> (pc 0x7f58d0bb98ec bp 0x615f8000 sp 0x7ffe976de5f0 T0)
> ==3342==The signal is caused by a READ memory access.
> ==3342==Hint: address points to the zero page.
>  #0 0x7f58d0bb98ec in QV4::MarkStack::drain()
> (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb28ec)
>  #1 0x7f58d0bba1e4 in QV4::MemoryManager::mark()
> (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb31e4)
>  #2 0x7f58d0bbc37d  (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb537d)
>  #3 0x7f58d0bbdb87 in QV4::MemoryManager::allocData(unsigned long)
> (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb6b87)
>  #4 0x7f58d0bbdbe2 in
> QV4::MemoryManager::allocObjectWithMemberData(QV4::VTable const*,
> unsigned int) (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb6be2)
>  #5 0x7f58d0cd10f0 in
> QV4::Runtime::CreateMappedArgumentsObject::call(QV4::ExecutionEngine*)
> (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0x1ca0f0)
>  #6 0x7f58bc65b06d  (/memfd:JITCode:QtQml (deleted)+0x6d)
> 
> :( Thought 5.15 would have all needed fixes.
> 
> Greetings
> Christoph
> 
> On 2020-07-05 15:47, CI System wrote:
> > BUILD UNSTABLE
> > 
> >  Build URL
> > 
> > https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/ktexteditor/
job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQ
> > t5.15/4/>   
> >  Project:
> > kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15
> > 
> >  Date of build:
> > Sun, 05 Jul 2020 13:40:03 +
> > 
> >  Build duration:
> > 7 min 46 sec and counting
> > 
> >  BUILD ARTIFACTS
> > 
> > * abi-compatibility-results.yaml [1]
> > * acc/KF5TextEditor-5.72.0.xml [2]
> > * compat_reports/KF5TextEditor_compat_report.html [3]
> > * logs/KF5TextEditor/5.72.0/log.txt [4]
> > 
> >  JUnit Tests
> > 
> > Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), 
Skipped: 0
> > 
> > test(s), Total: 1 test(s)
> > 
> > Name: projectroot Failed: 3 test(s), Passed: 59 
test(s), Skipped: 0
> > 
> > test(s), Total: 62 test(s)
> > 
> > * Failed: projectroot.autotests.bug313759
> > 
> > * Failed: projectroot.autotests.kateindenttest_testAda
> > 
> > * Failed: projectroot.autotests.kateindenttest_testPascal
> > 
> > Name: projectroot.autotests.src Failed: 0 test(s), 
Passed: 5
> > 
> > test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 5 test(s)
> > 
> >  Cobertura Report
> >  
> >  Project Coverage Summary
> >  
> >  Name
> > 
> > Packages
> > Files
> > Classes
> > Lines
> > Conditionals
> > 
> > Cobertura Coverage Report
> > 79% (22/28)
> > 85% (262/307)
> > 85% (262/307)
> > 67% (33050/49269)
> > 49% (14779/30050)
> > 
> > Coverage Breakdown by Package
> > 
> >  Name
> > 
> > Files
> > Classes
> > Lines
> > Conditionals
> > 
> > autotests.src
> > 97% (37/38)
> > 97% (37/38)
> > 93% (4798/5140)
> > 49% (1812/3680)
> > 
> > autotests.src.vimode
> > 100% (9/9)
> > 100% (9/9)
> > 99% (5528/5570)
> > 58% (984/1708)
> > 
> > src.buffer
> > 88% (15/17)
> > 88% (15/17)
> > 89% (1677/1892)
> > 74% (1078/1464)
> > 
> > src.completion
> > 100% (11/11)
> > 100% (11/11)
> > 57% (1788/3134)
> > 42% (1009/2425)
> > 
> > src.completion.expandingtree
> > 100% (3/3)
> > 100% (3/3)
> > 40% (182/457)
> > 21% (73/340)
> > 
> > src.dialogs
> > 0% (0/4)
> > 0% (0/4)
> > 0% (0/864)
> > 0% (0/184)
> > 
> > src.document
> > 100% (4/4)
> > 100% (4/4)
> > 61% (1936/3179)
> > 48% (1407/2945)
> > 
> > src.export
> > 0% (0/4)
> > 0% (0/4)
> > 0% (0/121)
> > 0% (0/156)
> > 
> > src.include.ktexteditor
> > 78% (14/18)
> > 78% (14/18)
> > 83% (189/227)
> > 55% (125/226)
> > 
> > src.inputmode
> > 100% (8/8)
> > 100% (8/8)
> > 63% (192/304)
> > 51% (39/77)
> > 
> > src.mode
> > 88% (7/8)
> > 

Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-06 Thread Christoph Cullmann

Hi,

this shows again a different V4 GC error :/

==3342==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0028 
(pc 0x7f58d0bb98ec bp 0x615f8000 sp 0x7ffe976de5f0 T0)

==3342==The signal is caused by a READ memory access.
==3342==Hint: address points to the zero page.
#0 0x7f58d0bb98ec in QV4::MarkStack::drain() 
(/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb28ec)
#1 0x7f58d0bba1e4 in QV4::MemoryManager::mark() 
(/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb31e4)

#2 0x7f58d0bbc37d  (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb537d)
#3 0x7f58d0bbdb87 in QV4::MemoryManager::allocData(unsigned long) 
(/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb6b87)
#4 0x7f58d0bbdbe2 in 
QV4::MemoryManager::allocObjectWithMemberData(QV4::VTable const*, 
unsigned int) (/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0xb6be2)
#5 0x7f58d0cd10f0 in 
QV4::Runtime::CreateMappedArgumentsObject::call(QV4::ExecutionEngine*) 
(/usr/lib64/libQt5Qml.so.5+0x1ca0f0)

#6 0x7f58bc65b06d  (/memfd:JITCode:QtQml (deleted)+0x6d)

:( Thought 5.15 would have all needed fixes.

Greetings
Christoph

On 2020-07-05 15:47, CI System wrote:

BUILD UNSTABLE

 Build URL

https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/ktexteditor/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.15/4/

 Project:
kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15

 Date of build:
Sun, 05 Jul 2020 13:40:03 +

 Build duration:
7 min 46 sec and counting

 BUILD ARTIFACTS

* abi-compatibility-results.yaml [1]
* acc/KF5TextEditor-5.72.0.xml [2]
* compat_reports/KF5TextEditor_compat_report.html [3]
* logs/KF5TextEditor/5.72.0/log.txt [4]

 JUnit Tests

Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0
test(s), Total: 1 test(s)

Name: projectroot Failed: 3 test(s), Passed: 59 test(s), 
Skipped: 0
test(s), Total: 62 test(s)

* Failed: projectroot.autotests.bug313759

* Failed: projectroot.autotests.kateindenttest_testAda

* Failed: projectroot.autotests.kateindenttest_testPascal

Name: projectroot.autotests.src Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 5
test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 5 test(s)

 Cobertura Report

 Project Coverage Summary

 Name
Packages
Files
Classes
Lines
Conditionals

Cobertura Coverage Report
79% (22/28)
85% (262/307)
85% (262/307)
67% (33050/49269)
49% (14779/30050)

Coverage Breakdown by Package

 Name
Files
Classes
Lines
Conditionals

autotests.src
97% (37/38)
97% (37/38)
93% (4798/5140)
49% (1812/3680)

autotests.src.vimode
100% (9/9)
100% (9/9)
99% (5528/5570)
58% (984/1708)

src.buffer
88% (15/17)
88% (15/17)
89% (1677/1892)
74% (1078/1464)

src.completion
100% (11/11)
100% (11/11)
57% (1788/3134)
42% (1009/2425)

src.completion.expandingtree
100% (3/3)
100% (3/3)
40% (182/457)
21% (73/340)

src.dialogs
0% (0/4)
0% (0/4)
0% (0/864)
0% (0/184)

src.document
100% (4/4)
100% (4/4)
61% (1936/3179)
48% (1407/2945)

src.export
0% (0/4)
0% (0/4)
0% (0/121)
0% (0/156)

src.include.ktexteditor
78% (14/18)
78% (14/18)
83% (189/227)
55% (125/226)

src.inputmode
100% (8/8)
100% (8/8)
63% (192/304)
51% (39/77)

src.mode
88% (7/8)
88% (7/8)
36% (378/1051)
16% (146/891)

src.part
0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)
0% (0/7)
100% (0/0)

src.printing
0% (0/4)
0% (0/4)
0% (0/862)
0% (0/278)

src.render
100% (8/8)
100% (8/8)
77% (950/1227)
67% (610/914)

src.schema
22% (2/9)
22% (2/9)
1% (19/1472)
1% (6/625)

src.script
 

KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-05 Thread CI System
BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/ktexteditor/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.15/4/
 Project:
kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15
 Date of build:
Sun, 05 Jul 2020 13:40:03 +
 Build duration:
7 min 46 sec and counting
   BUILD ARTIFACTS
  abi-compatibility-results.yamlacc/KF5TextEditor-5.72.0.xmlcompat_reports/KF5TextEditor_compat_report.htmllogs/KF5TextEditor/5.72.0/log.txt
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Name: projectroot Failed: 3 test(s), Passed: 59 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 62 test(s)Failed: projectroot.autotests.bug313759Failed: projectroot.autotests.kateindenttest_testAdaFailed: projectroot.autotests.kateindenttest_testPascalName: projectroot.autotests.src Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 5 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 5 test(s)
   Cobertura Report
  
   Project Coverage Summary
  
   Name
  PackagesFilesClassesLinesConditionalsCobertura Coverage Report79%
(22/28)85%
(262/307)85%
(262/307)67%
(33050/49269)49%
(14779/30050)Coverage Breakdown by Package
Name
   FilesClassesLinesConditionalsautotests.src97%
(37/38)97%
(37/38)93%
(4798/5140)49%
(1812/3680)autotests.src.vimode100%
(9/9)100%
(9/9)99%
(5528/5570)58%
(984/1708)src.buffer88%
(15/17)88%
(15/17)89%
(1677/1892)74%
(1078/1464)src.completion100%
(11/11)100%
(11/11)57%
(1788/3134)42%
(1009/2425)src.completion.expandingtree100%
(3/3)100%
(3/3)40%
(182/457)21%
(73/340)src.dialogs0%
(0/4)0%
(0/4)0%
(0/864)0%
(0/184)src.document100%
(4/4)100%
(4/4)61%
(1936/3179)48%
(1407/2945)src.export0%
(0/4)0%
(0/4)0%
(0/121)0%
(0/156)src.include.ktexteditor78%
(14/18)78%
(14/18)83%
(189/227)55%
(125/226)src.inputmode100%
(8/8)100%
(8/8)63%
(192/304)51%
(39/77)src.mode88%
(7/8)88%
(7/8)36%
(378/1051)16%
(146/891)src.part0%
(0/1)0%
(0/1)0%
(0/7)100%
(0/0)src.printing0%
(0/4)0%
(0/4)0%
(0/862)0%
(0/278)src.render100%
(8/8)100%
(8/8)77%
(950/1227)67%
(610/914)src.schema22%
(2/9)22%
(2/9)1%
(19/1472)1%
(6/625)src.script94%
(16/17)94%
(16/17)67%