bcooksley added a comment.
In regards to needing to inspect the build directory (which is something we
rarely get asked for) the system automatically tarballs a copy of the entire
workspace (which includes the source code and build directory) whenever a build
fails or has failing tests.
habacker added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5175#181288, @bcooksley wrote:
> I still question how these installs conflict - as all the scenarios where
they could conflict should already be taken into account:
>
> 1. Linux distros, FreeBSD, etc have no co-installability
bcooksley added a comment.
I still question how these installs conflict - as all the scenarios where
they could conflict should already be taken into account:
1. Linux distros, FreeBSD, etc have no co-installability issues here
2. Windows installs should be one prefix per application,
dfaure added a comment.
Well, the kstars hack shouldn't exist and makes me cringe.
But indeed the kate mac-packaging script is a valid case, please get in touch
with Christoph Cullmann about it.
The rekonq use case looks valid too but that code doesn't seem really
maintained
cgiboudeaux added a comment.
This will have effects on the non-kio users :
https://lxr.kde.org/search?_string=kio_http_cache_cleaner
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5175
To: habacker, dfaure, ltoscano, bcooksley
Cc: cgiboudeaux, #frameworks
habacker added reviewers: ltoscano, bcooksley.
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5175
To: habacker, dfaure, ltoscano, bcooksley
Cc: #frameworks
habacker added a reviewer: dfaure.
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5175
To: habacker, dfaure
Cc: #frameworks
habacker created this revision.
Restricted Application added a project: Frameworks.
Restricted Application added a subscriber: Frameworks.
REVISION SUMMARY
BUG:377686
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5175
AFFECTED FILES
