Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-08-22 Thread Christoph Cullmann
On 2020-08-22 00:25, David Faure wrote: Hi Christoph, As part of my continuous effort to keep the KF5 CI "green", I submitted a MR for skipping the crashing tests if Qt is <= 5.15.0 : https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/ktexteditor/-/merge_requests/18 The question is: does that help? For me it

Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-08-21 Thread David Faure
Hi Christoph, As part of my continuous effort to keep the KF5 CI "green", I submitted a MR for skipping the crashing tests if Qt is <= 5.15.0 : https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/ktexteditor/-/merge_requests/18 But please note that there's also this actual regression:

Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-11 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 3:23 AM Christoph Cullmann wrote: > > On 2020-07-09 10:03, Christoph Cullmann wrote: > > On 2020-07-08 00:07, David Faure wrote: > >> On mardi 7 juillet 2020 17:58:26 CEST Christoph Cullmann wrote: > >>> On 2020-07-07 12:16, David Faure wrote: > >>> > Yep :( > >>> > > >>>

Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-11 Thread Christoph Cullmann
On 2020-07-09 10:03, Christoph Cullmann wrote: On 2020-07-08 00:07, David Faure wrote: On mardi 7 juillet 2020 17:58:26 CEST Christoph Cullmann wrote: On 2020-07-07 12:16, David Faure wrote: > Yep :( > > You'll tell Simon and/or QTBUG-*? I will take a look if I can find some existing bug or

Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-09 Thread Christoph Cullmann
On 2020-07-08 00:07, David Faure wrote: On mardi 7 juillet 2020 17:58:26 CEST Christoph Cullmann wrote: On 2020-07-07 12:16, David Faure wrote: > Yep :( > > You'll tell Simon and/or QTBUG-*? I will take a look if I can find some existing bug or open a new. Simon left Qt, or? Yes but I think

Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-07 Thread David Faure
On mardi 7 juillet 2020 17:58:26 CEST Christoph Cullmann wrote: > On 2020-07-07 12:16, David Faure wrote: > > Yep :( > > > > You'll tell Simon and/or QTBUG-*? > > I will take a look if I can find some existing bug or open a new. > > Simon left Qt, or? Yes but I think that was already the case

Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-07 Thread Christoph Cullmann
On 2020-07-07 12:16, David Faure wrote: Yep :( You'll tell Simon and/or QTBUG-*? I will take a look if I can find some existing bug or open a new. Simon left Qt, or? Greetings Christoph On lundi 6 juillet 2020 16:28:27 CEST Christoph Cullmann wrote: Hi, this shows again a different V4

Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-07 Thread David Faure
Yep :( You'll tell Simon and/or QTBUG-*? On lundi 6 juillet 2020 16:28:27 CEST Christoph Cullmann wrote: > Hi, > > this shows again a different V4 GC error :/ > > ==3342==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0028 > (pc 0x7f58d0bb98ec bp 0x615f8000 sp 0x7ffe976de5f0

Re: KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-06 Thread Christoph Cullmann
Hi, this shows again a different V4 GC error :/ ==3342==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0028 (pc 0x7f58d0bb98ec bp 0x615f8000 sp 0x7ffe976de5f0 T0) ==3342==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==3342==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0

KDE CI: Frameworks » ktexteditor » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

2020-07-05 Thread CI System
BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/ktexteditor/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.15/4/ Project: kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 Date of build: Sun, 05 Jul 2020 13:40:03 + Build duration: 7 min 46 sec and counting BUILD ARTIFACTS