El Dissabte, 14 de desembre de 2013, a les 20:30:14, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
Hello everyone,
Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean, thanks to
everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the time to go for the last push.
For that I opened what will be the last epic
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote:
I have now re-split kdelibs, updated repositories can be found in the
usual place.
One new conflict did come up - kdnssd is already taken, so it was called
kdnssd-framework instead.
Thank you Ben. I've just pushed
Le mercredi 18 décembre 2013 00:00:57 Cornelius Schumacher a écrit :
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 Kevin Ottens wrote:
That's an option. We could also see if we could make inqlude.org job
easier, I guess it uses a similar input format too.
Yes, inqlude.org uses a similar meta file, but I
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those
repositories however as they are very generic - and thus tread on common
namespace. Suggestions are welcome.
In case anyone wonders, here's the full list of frameworks:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those
repositories however as they are very generic - and thus tread on common
namespace. Suggestions are
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 21:40:48 Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those
repositories however as they are very
On 17/12/13 08:37, David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those
repositories however as they are very generic - and thus tread on common
namespace. Suggestions are welcome.
In case anyone
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:17:59 +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
On Monday 16 December 2013 15:16:42 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Do you want us to add ourselves as contacts in the table or do you
plan to
fill it later? If the former, I would assign myself to Get the
dependency
graph generator script
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Alex Merry k...@randomguy3.me.uk wrote:
On 17/12/13 08:37, David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those
repositories however as they are very generic - and
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:59 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 21:40:48 Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
I do have some reservations as to the
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:17:35 +0100, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:17:59 +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Regarding the split: what is going to happen to the frameworks
branch of the
kdelibs repository after the split? Is it going to be removed or is
it
going to stay there with the
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd. The rest of the names are quite
descriptive as to what they contain and are fine.
Yeah, itemmodels and itemviews often come up as not
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:39 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd. The rest of the names are quite
descriptive as to what they
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd.
Let's rename the repos to kitemmodels, kitemviews and kdnssd,
this will be in line with karchive and most others (this doesn't change the
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:25:02 +0100, David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd.
Let's rename the repos to kitemmodels, kitemviews and kdnssd,
this will be in
On 17/12/13 12:57, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
I guess the question is - what does this module actually bring. I
assume, a consistent look-n-feel for KDE-produced api docs, right?
Yes. It also goes a bit further by doing things like generating menus
in the sidebar and handling cross-doxygen
On 17/12/13 15:26, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:54:44 +, Alex Merry wrote:
On 17/12/13 12:57, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
I guess the question is - what does this module actually bring. I
assume, a consistent look-n-feel for KDE-produced api docs, right?
Yes. It also goes a
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:54:44 +, Alex Merry wrote:
On 17/12/13 12:57, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
I guess the question is - what does this module actually bring. I
assume, a consistent look-n-feel for KDE-produced api docs, right?
Yes. It also goes a bit further by doing things like generating
On 17/12/13 15:31, Alex Merry wrote:
On 17/12/13 15:26, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:54:44 +, Alex Merry wrote:
On 17/12/13 12:57, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
I guess the question is - what does this module actually bring. I
assume, a consistent look-n-feel for KDE-produced
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 11:32:46 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:17:35 +0100, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:17:59 +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Regarding the split: what is going to happen to the frameworks
branch of the
kdelibs repository after the split?
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Martin Klapetek martin.klape...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:39 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
itemmodels,
On 15/12/13 21:18, Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Sunday 15 December 2013 10:58:35 Alex Merry wrote:
I'd like to rename the makekdewidgets executable to something like
kgendesignerplugin, to be more descriptive; this should be SC providing
we keep the old CMake variables around, but should probably
Le samedi 14 décembre 2013 20:30:14 Kevin Ottens a écrit :
Hello everyone,
Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean, thanks to
everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the time to go for the last push.
For that I opened what will be the last epic for the 5.0
Hello,
On Monday 16 December 2013 15:16:42 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Do you want us to add ourselves as contacts in the table or do you plan to
fill it later? If the former, I would assign myself to Get the dependency
graph generator script ready, Have the frameworks on api.kde.org (already
did
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
On Sunday 15 December 2013 10:58:35 Alex Merry wrote:
On 14/12/13 19:30, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean,
thanks
to
everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
On Sunday 15 December 2013 10:58:35 Alex Merry wrote:
On 14/12/13 19:30, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board
On Saturday 14 December 2013 20:55:30 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Hi Kévin,
On Saturday, December 14, 2013 20:30:14 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Once the technology preview is tagged, then all attention will be needed
on the remaining tasks to get a final release. This list looks
suspiciously short
El Dissabte, 14 de desembre de 2013, a les 20:30:14, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
Hello everyone,
Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean, thanks to
everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the time to go for the last push.
For that I opened what will be the last epic
On Sunday 15 December 2013 10:58:35 Alex Merry wrote:
On 14/12/13 19:30, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean, thanks
to
everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the time to go for the last
push. For that I opened what will be the last
On Sunday 15 December 2013 16:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dissabte, 14 de desembre de 2013, a les 20:30:14, Kevin Ottens va
escriure:
Hello everyone,
Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean, thanks
to
everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the time
Hello everyone,
Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean, thanks to
everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the time to go for the last push.
For that I opened what will be the last epic for the 5.0 release:
31 matches
Mail list logo
