On Monday 02 May 2016 10:02:29 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Am Samstag, 9. April 2016, 12:09:30 CEST schrieb David Faure:
> > On Friday 08 April 2016 02:10:15 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > > Right now it seems at least the 5.21.0 version misses with all KF5
> > > products,
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2016, 09:33:51 CEST schrieb David Faure:
> On Saturday 09 April 2016 19:02:02 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > IIRC elsewhere I have seen people using a version called "git" in issue
> > trackers, which would be used by developers for random snaphots and have
> > them state
Hi David,
Am Samstag, 9. April 2016, 12:09:30 CEST schrieb David Faure:
> On Friday 08 April 2016 02:10:15 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > Right now it seems at least the 5.21.0 version misses with all KF5
> > products, though some also seem to miss the version 5.20.0 (e.g.
> > frameworks-khtm
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 12:09 PM, David Faure wrote:
> One following issue remains:
> there is no frameworks-krunner bugzilla product. There is a krunner product,
> but it's not the same
> thing, it's not KF5-versionned. Should we add one? Who would be the
> maintainer?
> (the yaml file points to
On Saturday 09 April 2016 19:02:02 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> IIRC elsewhere I have seen people using a version called "git" in issue
> trackers, which would be used by developers for random snaphots and have them
> state the git commit id explicitely in the bug report.
Alternatively, on
Am Samstag, 9. April 2016, 18:33:33 CEST schrieb David Faure:
> On Saturday 09 April 2016 17:04:06 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > Though perhaps the versions should be added to bugs.kde.org on time or
> > even
> > before bumping the version number in the sources. Because developers who
> > run
On Saturday 09 April 2016 17:04:06 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Though perhaps the versions should be added to bugs.kde.org on time or even
> before bumping the version number in the sources. Because developers who run
> from latest git master and find bugs would rely on the version number t
Am Samstag, 9. April 2016, 12:09:30 CEST schrieb David Faure:
> On Friday 08 April 2016 02:10:15 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > please do not forget to also add versions to KF5 products on bugs.kde.org
> > on new releases.
>
> I don't, it's now part of the release procedure.
Goo
On Friday 08 April 2016 02:10:15 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please do not forget to also add versions to KF5 products on bugs.kde.org on
> new releases.
I don't, it's now part of the release procedure.
> Was there not a script provided by some good developers meanwhile to help
>
Hi,
please do not forget to also add versions to KF5 products on bugs.kde.org on
new releases.
Was there not a script provided by some good developers meanwhile to help with
that?
Right now it seems at least the 5.21.0 version misses with all KF5 products,
though some also seem to miss the ve
10 matches
Mail list logo