Am Montag, 14. Februar 2022, 16:32:57 CET schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> It introduces code breaking defines, some of them even of questionable
> benefit for an application like QT_NO_KEYWORDS
>
> I don't understand how such a breaking commit was accepted.
>
> Who is going to fix all the applicatio
El dilluns, 14 de febrer de 2022, a les 16:53:42 (CET), Christoph Cullmann
(cullmann.io) va escriure:
> On 2022-02-14 16:32, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > It introduces code breaking defines, some of them even of questionable
> > benefit for an application like QT_NO_KEYWORDS
> >
> > I don't under
It introduces code breaking defines, some of them even of questionable benefit
for an application like QT_NO_KEYWORDS
I don't understand how such a breaking commit was accepted.
Who is going to fix all the applications in KDE to build after that?
Apps that I've tried and failed:
* okular
* kd