---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111081/
---
(Updated June 20, 2013, 8:16 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111081/
---
(Updated June 20, 2013, 10:22 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111081/#review34747
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On June 20, 2013, 10:22
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111081/
---
(Updated June 20, 2013, 10:35 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111081/#review34748
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On June 18, 2013, 2:06 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
kio/tests/jobtest.cpp, line 264
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111081/diff/1/?file=164106#file164106line264
Do we agree that the goal is that both uiDelegate() and
interactionInterface() will return 0 if you link only kiocore?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111081/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Description
---
KIO::Job: more
On June 18, 2013, 2:06 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
kio/kio/job.cpp, line 209
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111081/diff/1/?file=164098#file164098line209
Interesting... So not having the uiDelegate() but the
interactionInterface() qualify as interactive... Not sure if that could
