Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-12-04 Thread Denis Kuplyakov
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112880/ --- (Updated Dec. 4, 2013, 7:32 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-11-28 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Oct. 21, 2013, 11:22 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: To get in this patch would benefit from being based on the frameworks branch and go into kdeclarative. Kevin Ottens wrote: Any chance for an update? Denis Kuplyakov wrote: Yes I will finish it, when have time. There are many

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-11-25 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Oct. 21, 2013, 11:22 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: To get in this patch would benefit from being based on the frameworks branch and go into kdeclarative. Kevin Ottens wrote: Any chance for an update? Denis Kuplyakov wrote: Yes I will finish it, when have time. There are many

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-11-10 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Oct. 21, 2013, 11:22 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: To get in this patch would benefit from being based on the frameworks branch and go into kdeclarative. Any chance for an update? - Kevin --- This is an automatically generated

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-11-10 Thread Denis Kuplyakov
On Oct. 21, 2013, 11:22 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: To get in this patch would benefit from being based on the frameworks branch and go into kdeclarative. Kevin Ottens wrote: Any chance for an update? Yes I will finish it, when have time. There are many pre-exams in university. -

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-10-09 Thread Denis Kuplyakov
On Oct. 1, 2013, 2:47 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote: kdeui/colors/kcolorschemetoken.h, line 70 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112880/diff/6/?file=192050#file192050line70 using int here loses the type-safety. Why no use the corresponding enums? It would also make the code more

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-10-09 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Oct. 1, 2013, 2:47 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote: kdeui/colors/kcolorschemetoken.h, line 70 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112880/diff/6/?file=192050#file192050line70 using int here loses the type-safety. Why no use the corresponding enums? It would also make the code more

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-10-09 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Sept. 24, 2013, 6:55 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: I'm not sure we can let that in for kdelibs 4.x / kdeui... David? Any opinion? If we ignore that point for the moment, and think in terms of KF5, ATM it would go with KColorScheme in KConfigWidgets. I'm not quite sold on the

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-10-09 Thread Denis Kuplyakov
On Oct. 1, 2013, 2:47 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote: kdeui/colors/kcolorschemetoken.h, line 70 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112880/diff/6/?file=192050#file192050line70 using int here loses the type-safety. Why no use the corresponding enums? It would also make the code more

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-10-08 Thread Denis Kuplyakov
On Sept. 29, 2013, 4:24 p.m., David Faure wrote: The name token surprises me a bit. Is this a usual naming scheme for accessing C++ classes from QML? Otherwise I would think the QML code would want to just write KColorScheme. Maybe the registration could be done in a static method,

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-10-08 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Oct. 1, 2013, 2:47 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote: kdeui/colors/kcolorschemetoken.h, line 70 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112880/diff/6/?file=192050#file192050line70 using int here loses the type-safety. Why no use the corresponding enums? It would also make the code more

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-10-06 Thread Denis Kuplyakov
On Oct. 1, 2013, 2:47 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote: kdeui/colors/kcolorschemetoken.h, line 70 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112880/diff/6/?file=192050#file192050line70 using int here loses the type-safety. Why no use the corresponding enums? It would also make the code more

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-10-06 Thread Denis Kuplyakov
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112880/ --- (Updated Oct. 6, 2013, 7:24 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-10-01 Thread Sebastian Kügler
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112880/#review41068 --- I'm not a huge fan of using Q_INVOKABLE for something that

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-09-29 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112880/#review41002 --- The name token surprises me a bit. Is this a usual naming

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-09-29 Thread Denis Kuplyakov
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112880/ --- (Updated Sept. 29, 2013, 4:27 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-09-29 Thread Denis Kuplyakov
On Sept. 29, 2013, 4:24 p.m., David Faure wrote: The name token surprises me a bit. Is this a usual naming scheme for accessing C++ classes from QML? Otherwise I would think the QML code would want to just write KColorScheme. Maybe the registration could be done in a static method,

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-09-24 Thread Denis Kuplyakov
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112880/ --- (Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 4:08 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

2013-09-23 Thread Denis Kuplyakov
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112880/ --- (Updated Sept. 23, 2013, 2:43 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and