On Jan. 7, 2014, 3:14 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
checking obviously makes sense, though it shouldn't be needed. There must
be something else which is wrong here, too.
Could you try what the value of WId is in these cases? I wouldn't be
surprised if it were 0.
Oh and that code
On Jan. 7, 2014, 2:14 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
checking obviously makes sense, though it shouldn't be needed. There must
be something else which is wrong here, too.
Could you try what the value of WId is in these cases? I wouldn't be
surprised if it were 0.
Oh and that code
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114895/
---
(Updated Jan. 8, 2014, 12:18 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114895/#review47047
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On Jan. 7, 2014, 3:14 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
checking obviously makes sense, though it shouldn't be needed. There must
be something else which is wrong here, too.
Could you try what the value of WId is in these cases? I wouldn't be
surprised if it were 0.
Oh and that code
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114895/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks, Martin Gräßlin and Marco Martin.
On Jan. 7, 2014, 2:14 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
checking obviously makes sense, though it shouldn't be needed. There must
be something else which is wrong here, too.
Could you try what the value of WId is in these cases? I wouldn't be
surprised if it were 0.
Oh and that code
On Jan. 7, 2014, 3:14 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
checking obviously makes sense, though it shouldn't be needed. There must
be something else which is wrong here, too.
Could you try what the value of WId is in these cases? I wouldn't be
surprised if it were 0.
Oh and that code
