---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115629/#review49608
---
Well, clearly the use of a pointer was because of the either
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115629/
---
(Updated Feb. 12, 2014, 8:24 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115629/#review49625
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Faure
On Feb. 12, 2014, 7:24
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115629/
---
(Updated Feb. 12, 2014, 7:32 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115629/#review49629
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115629/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Jekyll Wu.
Repository: kde-runtime
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115629/#review49455
---
drkonqi/main.cpp
On Feb. 10, 2014, 4:14 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
drkonqi/main.cpp, line 74
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115629/diff/1/?file=243089#file243089line74
You can instantiate QApplication in the stack, instead of calling
new+delete.
Also you probably want to
