Re: Review Request 116699: No longer use pid_t or Q_PID

2014-03-18 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116699/#review53314 --- This review has been submitted with commit

Re: Review Request 116699: No longer use pid_t or Q_PID

2014-03-18 Thread Alexander Richardson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116699/ --- (Updated March 18, 2014, 12:19 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 116699: No longer use pid_t or Q_PID

2014-03-17 Thread Kevin Ottens
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116699/#review53185 --- Anything blocking here? - Kevin Ottens On March 12, 2014,

Re: Review Request 116699: No longer use pid_t or Q_PID

2014-03-12 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116699/#review52731 --- there is QProcess::processId() since 5.3 (replacing

Review Request 116699: No longer use pid_t or Q_PID

2014-03-10 Thread Alexander Richardson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116699/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kio Description ---

Re: Review Request 116699: No longer use pid_t or Q_PID

2014-03-10 Thread Alexander Richardson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116699/ --- (Updated March 10, 2014, 5:51 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks