---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117011/
---
(Updated April 24, 2014, 9:57 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117011/#review55168
---
Any news?
- Kevin Ottens
On March 23, 2014, 11:28 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117011/#review54439
---
I'm all for extending QStandardPaths, but obviously %KDEROOT%
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117011/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and kdewin.
Repository: kdoctools
On March 24, 2014, 12:51 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
So what should happen so that we didn't need the workaround?
QStandardPaths would have to look in %KDEROOT%\share and not just
C:\ProgramData.
- Alexander
---
This is an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117011/#review53880
---
Please add kdewin too. Given the outcome of the other RR, I'm
On March 23, 2014, 11:51 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
So what should happen so that we didn't need the workaround?
Alexander Richardson wrote:
QStandardPaths would have to look in %KDEROOT%\share and not just
C:\ProgramData.
So why aren't we adding this in Qt? Or even, why are