---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/#review59377
---
Ship it!
I guess you used QFile::link wrongly in your
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/#review59456
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/
---
(Updated June 6, 2014, 3:33 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/#review59457
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/
---
(Updated June 6, 2014, 3:33 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/#review59123
---
Very good to see that it brings the FAM backend to be more in
On June 4, 2014, 3:38 a.m., David Faure wrote:
autotests/kdirwatch_unittest.cpp, line 523
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/diff/1/?file=277318#file277318line523
The commit log doesn't mention any changes related to
QFileSystemWatcher, only to the FAM backend. Are you sure
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/
---
(Updated June 4, 2014, 1:05 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/#review59018
---
The high-level logic makes sense, but I would prefer for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Bugs: 329802
10 matches
Mail list logo
