---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124856/#review85847
---
David: please note that the QtDBus changes made it in for 5.6,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124856/
---
(Updated Sept. 23, 2015, 7:44 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124856/#review85325
---
Personnally, I don't like very much the idea of modifying kdel
> On Ago. 21, 2015, 8:08 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I thought the idea was "there's no race, because as long as the recipient
> > doesn't go to the event loop, it won't be processing any incoming messages
> > anyway"?
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> But with Thiago's patches dbus runs in
> On ago. 21, 2015, 8:08 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I thought the idea was "there's no race, because as long as the recipient
> > doesn't go to the event loop, it won't be processing any incoming messages
> > anyway"?
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> But with Thiago's patches dbus runs in
> On Aug. 21, 2015, 8:08 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I thought the idea was "there's no race, because as long as the recipient
> > doesn't go to the event loop, it won't be processing any incoming messages
> > anyway"?
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> But with Thiago's patches dbus runs in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124856/#review84149
---
Makes sense!
- Thiago Macieira
On Ago. 21, 2015, 4:06 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124856/
---
(Updated ago. 21, 2015, 4:06 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
