---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126001/#review88194
---
Ship it!
Ah, yes, I read the code too fast.
Indeed I expect
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126001/
---
(Updated Nov. 9, 2015, 2:43 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
> On Nov. 9, 2015, 2:57 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Isn't this exactly the wrong fix? The goal of the test with embedded NULs
> > in a QByteArray is to test that KConfig can be used to store binary data,
> > isn't it? So I would think the expected value was correct, it's the KConfig
> > code
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126001/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kconfig
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126001/#review88177
---
Isn't this exactly the wrong fix? The goal of the test with
