Re: Review Request 128205: Fix crash when a method exposed to Kross returns QVariant with non-relocatable data

2016-06-18 Thread Alexander Potashev
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128205/ --- (Updated June 18, 2016, 6:16 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 128205: Fix crash when a method exposed to Kross returns QVariant with non-relocatable data

2016-06-18 Thread Albert Astals Cid
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128205/#review96687 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Albert Astals Cid On June 16,

Re: Review Request 128205: Fix crash when a method exposed to Kross returns QVariant with non-relocatable data

2016-06-16 Thread Alexander Potashev
> On Июнь 17, 2016, 12:42 д.п., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > How hard is to add a unit test to prove this is needed+so it doesn't break > > again in the future? I've added this Python test case: http://commits.kde.org/kross-interpreters/b5a9d7320d02b5cbaa4cbef25341851849cc9d7a It's possible

Review Request 128205: Fix crash when a method exposed to Kross returns QVariant with non-relocatable data

2016-06-16 Thread Alexander Potashev
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128205/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Friedrich W. H. Kossebau.