On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Emmanuel Pescosta
emmanuelpescosta...@gmail.com wrote:
Hope you don't want to do this before tomorrow, do you?
If moving Dolphin to a new repo is still possible then yes, because I
would prefer a KF5 based version of Dolphin in 15.04 :)
Seems worth pushing
On Wednesday 25 of February 2015 17:21:07 David Edmundson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Emmanuel Pescosta
emmanuelpescosta...@gmail.com wrote:
Hope you don't want to do this before tomorrow, do you?
If moving Dolphin to a new repo is still possible then yes, because I
El Dimecres, 25 de febrer de 2015, a les 17:28:33, Luigi Toscano va escriure:
On Wednesday 25 of February 2015 17:21:07 David Edmundson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Emmanuel Pescosta
emmanuelpescosta...@gmail.com wrote:
Hope you don't want to do this before tomorrow, do
Let's make sure we can do this for the next release :)
It's almost ready for the next (15.08) release ;)
David Edmundson helped me a lot with moving Dolphin into a new repo, see
http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=dolphin.git
Cheers,
Emmanuel
2015-02-26 1:02 GMT+01:00 Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org:
Hope you don't want to do this before tomorrow, do you?
If moving Dolphin to a new repo is still possible then yes, because I would
prefer a KF5 based version of Dolphin in 15.04 :)
But if you think we should wait until the 15.04 freeze is over and release
a kdelibs4 version instead, is also ok.
Hi everyone,
We can split off Dolphin as soon as Dolphin is konq-lib free
Dolphin is almost ready for splitting (pending Review Request:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122687/) or merging (frameworks - master)
How should we proceed?
Cheers,
Emmanuel
2014-09-29 15:45 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel
El Dimarts, 24 de febrer de 2015, a les 10:55:20, Emmanuel Pescosta va
escriure:
Hi everyone,
We can split off Dolphin as soon as Dolphin is konq-lib free
Dolphin is almost ready for splitting (pending Review Request:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122687/) or merging (frameworks -
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:57 AM, David Narvaez
david.narv...@computer.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:13 AM, David Narvaez
david.narv...@computer.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:05 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
I thought kio-about was going into kio-extras?
Indeed, I just
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:13 AM, David Narvaez
david.narv...@computer.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:05 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
I thought kio-about was going into kio-extras?
Indeed, I just realized.
This is now at
On Sunday 18 January 2015 14:35:53 David Narvaez wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:27 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
AFAIK there are two ways. One where you replay the history using git
filter- branch, there's a wiki page about how to do this (iirc from Alex
Merry).
This is up at
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:05 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
I thought kio-about was going into kio-extras?
Indeed, I just realized.
David E. Narvaez
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:27 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
AFAIK there are two ways. One where you replay the history using git filter-
branch, there's a wiki page about how to do this (iirc from Alex Merry).
This is up at g...@git.kde.org:clones/kio/narvaez/kio-about-protocol
Please
On Wednesday 12 November 2014 18:26:22 David Narvaez wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:46 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
If it's useful to share it, let's share it, I have no objection to that.
How should this be done? Can I just copy things around and post a RR
or should be this moved
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:27 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Wednesday 12 November 2014 18:26:22 David Narvaez wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:46 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
If it's useful to share it, let's share it, I have no objection to
that.
How should this be
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:46 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
If it's useful to share it, let's share it, I have no objection to that.
How should this be done? Can I just copy things around and post a RR
or should be this moved around by one of our git curators to preserve
history?
David E.
On Thursday 06 November 2014 10:59:38 David Narvaez wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:06 PM, David Narvaez
david.narv...@computer.org wrote:
It's also used by Rekonq and anything building a web browser using KDE
software, it should really go to kioslave-extras.
Any feedback on this? If
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:06 PM, David Narvaez
david.narv...@computer.org wrote:
It's also used by Rekonq and anything building a web browser using KDE
software, it should really go to kioslave-extras.
Any feedback on this? If it will not be moved to kioslave-extras I
need to patch Rekonq to
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:07 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday 25 September 2014 01:01:27 Aleix Pol wrote:
- kioslave/about: I guess it should go either to kioslave-extras or
konqueror itself. I guess it's here because the applications use it, so
kioslave.
It's only used by
On Thursday 25 September 2014 01:01:27 Aleix Pol wrote:
- kdialog: should go to kde-cli-tools?
It's more interactive than other cli tools, but OK, I guess the biggest use
case is to call it from scripts.
- kioslave/about: I guess it should go either to kioslave-extras or
konqueror itself. I
- dolphin: could be split out, I added emmanuel as a CC to know his
opinion
Thanks for adding me and sorry for the late response.
+1 for splitting up kde-baseapps
We can split off Dolphin as soon as Dolphin is konq-lib free (David has
already done a huge amount of work in this field :)
Cheers,
On Wednesday 24 September 2014 17:39:42 Luca Beltrame wrote:
Michael Palimaka wrote:
Are there any plans to split frameworks-based kde-baseapps?
IMO it would make sense first to consult with the various applications'
maintainers and / or review what's in there and what should happen to it.
libkonq was discussed in the frameworks BOF at Akademy.
Some parts (konqoperations and such) will go into the KIO framework. I
think this has already been started. The rest will move into konqueror
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Hi,
Are there any plans to split frameworks-based kde-baseapps?
Best regards,
Michael
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Hi,
Are there any plans to split frameworks-based kde-baseapps?
Best regards,
Michael
Not that I know of, but it would probably make sense.
Aleix
___
Michael Palimaka wrote:
Are there any plans to split frameworks-based kde-baseapps?
IMO it would make sense first to consult with the various applications'
maintainers and / or review what's in there and what should happen to it.
--
Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team
KDE Science supporter
GPG
El Dimecres, 24 de setembre de 2014, a les 17:39:42, Luca Beltrame va
escriure:
Michael Palimaka wrote:
Are there any plans to split frameworks-based kde-baseapps?
IMO it would make sense first to consult with the various applications'
maintainers and / or review what's in there and what
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Luca Beltrame lbeltr...@kde.org wrote:
Michael Palimaka wrote:
Are there any plans to split frameworks-based kde-baseapps?
IMO it would make sense first to consult with the various applications'
maintainers and / or review what's in there and what should
Aleix Pol wrote:
- kioslave/about: I guess it should go either to kioslave-extras or
konqueror itself. I guess it's here because the applications use it, so
kioslave.
I'm wondering how many use that KIO slave aside konqueror...
- kfind: looks like it could be split. Doesn't look maintained,
28 matches
Mail list logo
