Re: Splitting KActivities, 2nd attempt...

2016-01-01 Thread David Faure
On Friday 01 January 2016 18:07:59 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > So, applications that do link to activities will run and work > uninterrupted even if the service is not present. OK, sounds good to me. -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE Frameworks 5

Re: Splitting KActivities, 2nd attempt...

2016-01-01 Thread Ivan Čukić
> Shouldn't the service be part of the framework? > How usable is the framework without the service? > Compiling is good, but running is even better :-) This is the reason why the split has not happened before. The purpose of the library is: [1] - to report document/resource events to the

Re: Splitting KActivities, 2nd attempt...

2015-12-28 Thread David Faure
Sounds good overall, but one question: On Sunday 08 November 2015 12:04:54 Ivan Čukić wrote: > Hi everybody, > > We have a few problems at the moment because all the activities > components are in a single repository. Sometimes dependencies of the > service creep up into the library, builds

Splitting KActivities, 2nd attempt...

2015-11-08 Thread Ivan Čukić
Hi everybody, We have a few problems at the moment because all the activities components are in a single repository. Sometimes dependencies of the service creep up into the library, builds break because components that are meant only for Plasma start requiring Qt versions that Plasma require,