Re: X11 usage in kdeinit/kinit.cpp

2014-02-23 Thread David Faure
On Monday 17 February 2014 16:36:45 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
 No that doesn't work as I expect that at least during the next decade we
 will  have both WAYLAND_DISPLAY and DISPLAY being set (DISPLAY for legacy
 applications which won't have a Wayland port any time soon - e.g. Qt4).

Then I don't see the problem with keeping the fact that the kdeinit socket 
contains $DISPLAY in its name (to avoid clashes between sessions).

-- 
David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5

___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Re: X11 usage in kdeinit/kinit.cpp

2014-02-17 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Saturday 15 February 2014 20:49:39 David Faure wrote:
 On Thursday 13 February 2014 09:29:40 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
  Hi,
  
  on my quest to ensure that we can run all applications with -platform
  wayland if compiled with X11 support I stumbled over
  kinit/kdeinit/kinit.cpp which gets compiled into the kdeinit5 binary. To
  quote the code:
  
  // Can't use QGuiApplication::platformName() here, there is no app
  instance
  
  And that's kind of a global problem in that file. So I don't see how we
  can
  make a version for wayland without compiling it twice. Will we still need
  kdeinit5 in the future or is that something which could be killed if we
  improve the startup process (thus ignore the problem)?
 
 Whether the speed improvement is still worth it for starting apps is still
 unknown, someone should profile it properly.
 However it's needed for sure for kioslaves, so that they can be started and
 passed between processes.
 
  A similar problem is present in wrapper.cpp which gets linked into the
  binaries:
  * kwrapper5
  * kshell5
  * kdeinit5_shutdown
  * kdeinit5_wrapper
  
  wrapper.cpp assumes there is a DISPLAY env variable and even if not it's
  set to :0.
 
 Can't we detect that we're not on X11 simply from the fact that DISPLAY is
 not set?

No that doesn't work as I expect that at least during the next decade we will 
have both WAYLAND_DISPLAY and DISPLAY being set (DISPLAY for legacy 
applications which won't have a Wayland port any time soon - e.g. Qt4).

 
 The current code is wrong on mac and windows too (but without a workspace,
 the functionality of passing slaves between apps is less used so I guess
 they just skip using kdeinit right now).
 
 In kdeinit.cpp it seems it's mostly for startup notification (x11 only),
 and some old multihead display code that screams remove me.
 
 In the other files, it's about the name of the socket to talk to kdeinit. If
 e.g. wayland has no such thing as a display (i.e. the possibility to run
 multiple sessions on the same machine), then this can just be skipped.

I run into one such socket thingy and adjusted it to work on Wayland, too. 
It's one of the many review requests I created last week.

Cheers
Martin

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: X11 usage in kdeinit/kinit.cpp

2014-02-17 Thread Christoph Cullmann
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
   wrapper.cpp assumes there is a DISPLAY env variable and even if not it's
   set to :0.
  
  Can't we detect that we're not on X11 simply from the fact that DISPLAY is
  not set?
 
 No that doesn't work as I expect that at least during the next decade we will
 have both WAYLAND_DISPLAY and DISPLAY being set (DISPLAY for legacy
 applications which won't have a Wayland port any time soon - e.g. Qt4).
Hi,

wouldn't be then the assumption: if WAYLAND_DISPLAY is defined, use wayland,
else use X11 work?

Or would it make any sense to have that defined (in a normal user desktop) but 
still
use X11 as default?

Greetings
Christoph

-- 
- Dr.-Ing. Christoph Cullmann -
AbsInt Angewandte Informatik GmbH  Email: cullm...@absint.com
Science Park 1 Tel:   +49-681-38360-22
66123 Saarbrücken  Fax:   +49-681-38360-20
GERMANYWWW:   http://www.AbsInt.com

Geschäftsführung: Dr.-Ing. Christian Ferdinand
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Saarbrücken, HRB 11234
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Re: X11 usage in kdeinit/kinit.cpp

2014-02-17 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Monday 17 February 2014 23:30:07 Christoph Cullmann wrote:
 - Ursprüngliche Mail -
 
wrapper.cpp assumes there is a DISPLAY env variable and even if not
it's
set to :0.
   
   Can't we detect that we're not on X11 simply from the fact that DISPLAY
   is
   not set?
  
  No that doesn't work as I expect that at least during the next decade we
  will have both WAYLAND_DISPLAY and DISPLAY being set (DISPLAY for legacy
  applications which won't have a Wayland port any time soon - e.g. Qt4).
 Hi,
 
 wouldn't be then the assumption: if WAYLAND_DISPLAY is defined, use
 wayland, else use X11 work?

Sounds dangerous to me.

 
 Or would it make any sense to have that defined (in a normal user desktop)
 but still use X11 as default?

Well I'm just running such a setup, but I'm not sure whether my dev setup 
counts as a valid setup ;-) I cannot say whether that will happen or not, but 
overall it sounds dangerous to me to infer functionality based on whether 
WAYLAND_DISPLAY is defined.

Cheers
Martin

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


X11 usage in kdeinit/kinit.cpp

2014-02-13 Thread Martin Gräßlin
Hi,

on my quest to ensure that we can run all applications with -platform wayland 
if compiled with X11 support I stumbled over kinit/kdeinit/kinit.cpp which 
gets compiled into the kdeinit5 binary. To quote the code:

// Can't use QGuiApplication::platformName() here, there is no app instance

And that's kind of a global problem in that file. So I don't see how we can 
make a version for wayland without compiling it twice. Will we still need 
kdeinit5 in the future or is that something which could be killed if we 
improve the startup process (thus ignore the problem)?

A similar problem is present in wrapper.cpp which gets linked into the 
binaries:
* kwrapper5
* kshell5
* kdeinit5_shutdown
* kdeinit5_wrapper

wrapper.cpp assumes there is a DISPLAY env variable and even if not it's set 
to :0.

Any recommendations?

Cheers
Martin

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel