On Monday 23 September 2013 11:43:58 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Monday, September 23, 2013 00:27:21 Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
On Thursday 19 September 2013 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Overview
I have put the data on Inqlude (see
On Monday, September 23, 2013, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
On Monday, September 23, 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Saturday 21 September 2013 15:25:27 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dissabte, 21 de setembre de 2013, a les 11:15:52, Stephen Kelly va
escriure:
Albert Astals Cid wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
Technically, this is the current focus. We're splitting kdelibs.
As to communication, it probably needs a bit of boilerplate. (Which the bits I
wrote don't contain purposefully.) Otherwise, you're right, we need to work
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112830/#review40629
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Sept. 23, 2013, noon,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112797/#review40632
---
Probably needs some porting notes in KDE5PORTING to point to
On Monday 23 September 2013 13:09:05 Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
Maybe we can use a third-party docbook-to-manpage conversion tool. On Linux
it would be easy to install, and on Windows it wouldn't be needed (what's
a manpage?). And still leave it optional everywhere...
Thats a very good question.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112902/#review40642
---
staging/kde4support/CMakeLists.txt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112900/#review40644
---
Yes, looks like a tier 2 in that case. I wonder if that
On Sept. 23, 2013, 10:37 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
I'm surprised it doesn't use qt5_wrap_ui. It seems to reinvent it at least
partly.
Jeremy Whiting wrote:
well, qt5_wrap_ui wasn't around when this was created (as
kde4_add_ui_files iirc). All I did was copy it and rename it.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112907/#review40646
---
Please split this into multiple patches. The move should be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112909/#review40648
---
I'm torn on that one... If we're sure the remaining features
On Sept. 23, 2013, 10:49 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
modules/ECMAddUnitTest.cmake, line 23
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112828/diff/2/?file=190650#file190650line23
I agree, it's about automated (vs manual) tests here. We've no way
when writing this macro to know if the user
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112907/#review40650
---
staging/kemoticons/src/providers/adium/CMakeLists.txt
On Sept. 23, 2013, 12:37 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
I'm surprised it doesn't use qt5_wrap_ui. It seems to reinvent it at least
partly.
Jeremy Whiting wrote:
well, qt5_wrap_ui wasn't around when this was created (as
kde4_add_ui_files iirc). All I did was copy it and rename it.
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1246/changes
Changes:
[mklapetek] Use QStringLiteral rather than QLatin1String
[steveire] Define isnan() for MSVC
[steveire] Don't use QStringLiteral as a default value initializer.
[steveire] Use the correct moc include on Windows.
On Sept. 24, 2013, 7:10 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
I'm torn on that one... If we're sure the remaining features aren't useful,
I would propose to just move all the printing stuff from KDE4Attic to
KDE4Support. If we're not sure, then we should move the printing stuff from
KDE4Attic to
On Thursday 19 September 2013 19:30:52 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Hi all,
We're planning to merge the frameworks-scratch branch of kde-workspace into
master next Monday. That means if you're building your Plasma yourself from
Git (and you're not yet ready for Plasma2 ;)), you should switch to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112909/#review40662
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Sept. 23, 2013, 6:47
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1249/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1250/
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112900/
---
(Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 11:14 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
El Dimarts, 24 de setembre de 2013, a les 08:49:20, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
On Monday 23 September 2013 13:09:05 Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
Maybe we can use a third-party docbook-to-manpage conversion tool. On
Linux
it would be easy to install, and on Windows it wouldn't be needed (what's
a
El Dimarts, 24 de setembre de 2013, a les 11:34:45, Martin Gräßlin va
escriure:
On Thursday 19 September 2013 19:30:52 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Hi all,
We're planning to merge the frameworks-scratch branch of kde-workspace
into
master next Monday. That means if you're building your
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 13:48:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 24 de setembre de 2013, a les 08:49:20, Kevin Ottens va
escriure:
On Monday 23 September 2013 13:09:05 Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
Maybe we can use a third-party docbook-to-manpage conversion tool. On
Linux
it would
On Sept. 23, 2013, 11:18 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
staging/kprintutils/KPrintUtilsConfig.cmake.in, line 3
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112882/diff/1/?file=191209#file191209line3
I surely has other dependencies.
Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Most things in staging have faulty
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112882/
---
(Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 12:22 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 13:51:57 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 24 de setembre de 2013, a les 11:34:45, Martin Gräßlin va
escriure:
On Thursday 19 September 2013 19:30:52 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Hi all,
We're planning to merge the frameworks-scratch branch of
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 13:48:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 24 de setembre de 2013, a les 08:49:20, Kevin Ottens va
escriure:
On Monday 23 September 2013 13:09:05 Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
Maybe we can use a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112311/#review40679
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112311/
---
(Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 1:10 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112830/
---
(Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 1:23 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112830/#review40680
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112909/#review40681
---
Ship it!
Agree to merge this as is, it removes the stuff that
On Sept. 24, 2013, 3:32 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
superbuild/CMakeLists.txt, line 46
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112915/diff/1/?file=191979#file191979line46
why have you removed kconfigwidgets?
Because it does not build with superbuild right now. The original intent of my
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112915/
---
(Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 3:39 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112918/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Description
---
Add index
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112909/#review40691
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112816/
---
(Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 2:19 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112816/#review40692
---
tier1/kguiaddons/src/lib/colors/kcolorutils.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112918/
---
(Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 2:25 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112816/#review40694
---
Probably we'll need an extra patch on top of this one so that
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112918/
---
(Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 2:33 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
On Sept. 24, 2013, 2:23 p.m., Sune Vuorela wrote:
tier1/kguiaddons/src/lib/colors/kcolorutils.cpp, line 42
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112816/diff/1/?file=190519#file190519line42
My initial reaction is that it could return a bool wether or not things
went okay, given there
Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Hi,
I have been playing around with itemviews CMake files and put together
some templates for the top level CMakeLists.txt and *Config.cmake.in. You
can find them attached there. Any one against me adding those to the
repository?
Aurélien
CMakeLists.txt
On Monday, September 23, 2013 15:08:57 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
Technically, this is the current focus. We're splitting kdelibs.
As to communication, it probably needs a bit of boilerplate. (Which the
bits I wrote don't
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 39 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on
#kde-devel at 4pm Paris time.
Were present: afiestas, agateau, apol, d_ed, dfaure, mck182, mgraesslin,
sebas, shadeslayer, teo, vHanda, wojtask9 and myself.
Announcement:
* I will be away next week,
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 15:05:56 Aleix Pol wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 13:48:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Are you sure that's an improvement?
Well, as highlighted we have a dependency issue there, so it's
On Sept. 23, 2013, 4:37 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
I'm surprised it doesn't use qt5_wrap_ui. It seems to reinvent it at least
partly.
Jeremy Whiting wrote:
well, qt5_wrap_ui wasn't around when this was created (as
kde4_add_ui_files iirc). All I did was copy it and rename it.
Maybe we can bundle the generated documentation?
Distributions in general don't want pregenerated anything.
/Sune
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 10:09 (UTC) Jos Poortvliet wrote:
Going through the article explaining Frameworks to the world*
yesterday, I bumped into quite some inconsistent use of terms.
Right now, we mix up:
modules
components
frameworks
addons
libraries
This article was developed
Going through the article explaining Frameworks to the world*
yesterday, I bumped into quite some inconsistent use of terms.
Right now, we mix up:
modules
components
frameworks
addons
libraries
For example in the article, we mostly talked 'modules' intermingled
with 'libraries', then suddenly
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112880/
---
(Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 4:08 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
On 24 September 2013 12:11, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
OK, let's attempt to move KLocale, KDateTime and friends to kde4support now.
With some luck we'll be able to completely get rid of KDE4Attic before
release.
Hmm, looking at that closer... indeed it looks like we can get rid of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112919/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Description
---
Moved all sources
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote:
I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are
worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to see if they're worth
switching to, if not before then at Qt Dev Days / Qt Contributors Day.
OK, I'll ignore this part of
On Tuesday 24 September 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Hi,
I have been playing around with itemviews CMake files and put together
some templates for the top level CMakeLists.txt and *Config.cmake.in. You
can find them attached there. Any one against me adding those
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112797/
---
(Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 6:08 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
On Tuesday 24 September 2013, Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Sep 24, 2013 7:33 AM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
On Monday 23 September 2013, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Hey,
On Monday, September 23, 2013 00:27:21 Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
On Thursday 19 September 2013
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112907/
---
(Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 8:44 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112921/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Description
---
Adjust
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112921/#review40728
---
Ship it!
El Dimarts, 24 de setembre de 2013, a les 14:09:57, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 13:48:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 24 de setembre de 2013, a les 08:49:20, Kevin Ottens va
escriure:
On Monday 23 September 2013 13:09:05 Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
Maybe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112923/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Description
---
Make leftMargin
63 matches
Mail list logo
