[kde-freebsd] bsd.qt.mk vs bsd.gcc.mk: USE_GCC - CXX - QMAKESPEC

2012-06-02 Thread Andriy Gapon
bsd.qt.mk sets QMAKESPEC based on CXX. This is done in the early stage of bsd.port.mk processing (!_POSTMKINCLUDED). bsd.gcc.mk may change CXX value based on USE_GCC (or WITH_GCC/WANT_CC in the future). But this is done in the main stage (_POSTMKINCLUDED). Thus, QMAKESPEC may fail to honor

[kde-freebsd] devel/qt4-makeqpf does not build

2012-06-02 Thread Rainer Hurling
With newest revision 1.14 devel/qt4-makeqpf does not buid anymore. It seems in Makefile there is needed an .include bsd.port.pre.mk somewhere before line 48? ___ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org

[kde-freebsd] [options-ng][patch] broken qt33 build after options-ng merge

2012-06-02 Thread Oliver Pinter
Hi All! In x11-toolkits/qt33 broked one expression with options-ng merge. The attached patch fixed this. --- Makefile.orig 2012-06-02 13:26:43.0 +0200 +++ Makefile 2012-06-02 13:27:23.0 +0200 @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MCUPS} LIB_DEPENDS+=

[kde-freebsd] [PATCH] devel/qt4-makeqpf: testing osversion needs bsd.port.pre.mk

2012-06-02 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Submitter-Id: current-users Originator:Baptiste Daroussin Organization: Confidential: no Synopsis: [PATCH] devel/qt4-makeqpf: testing osversion needs bsd.port.pre.mk Severity: non-critical Priority: low Category: ports Class: change-request Release:

Re: [kde-freebsd] devel/qt4-makeqpf does not build

2012-06-02 Thread Rainer Hurling
On 02.06.2012 11:53 (UTC+2), Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 08:22:41AM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote: With newest revision 1.14 devel/qt4-makeqpf does not buid anymore. It seems in Makefile there is needed an .includebsd.port.pre.mk somewhere before line 48? ports/168553

Re: [kde-freebsd] [options-ng][patch] broken qt33 build after options-ng merge

2012-06-02 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 01:31:51PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote: Hi All! In x11-toolkits/qt33 broked one expression with options-ng merge. The attached patch fixed this. --- Makefile.orig 2012-06-02 13:26:43.0 +0200 +++ Makefile 2012-06-02 13:27:23.0 +0200 @@ -110,7

Re: [kde-freebsd] devel/qt4-makeqpf -- references OSVERSION before initialized

2012-06-02 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org writes: Dear kde, devel/qt4-makeqpf port is throwing 'Malformed conditional' errors because you're referencing ${OSVERSION} before it is initialised. Here's a fix: lucid-nonsense:...ports/devel/qt4-makeqpf:# diff -u Makefile{~,} --- Makefile~ 2012-06-02

Re: [kde-freebsd] [options-ng][patch] broken qt33 build after options-ng merge

2012-06-02 Thread Oliver Pinter
On Saturday 02 June 2012 13:44:20 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 01:31:51PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote: Hi All! In x11-toolkits/qt33 broked one expression with options-ng merge. The attached patch fixed this. --- Makefile.orig 2012-06-02 13:26:43.0 +0200

Re: [kde-freebsd] [options-ng][patch] broken qt33 build after options-ng merge

2012-06-02 Thread Oliver Pinter
On Saturday 02 June 2012 18:49:17 Oliver Pinter wrote: On Saturday 02 June 2012 13:44:20 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 01:31:51PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote: Hi All! In x11-toolkits/qt33 broked one expression with options-ng merge. The attached patch fixed this.

[kde-freebsd] [SVN Commit] trunk

2012-06-02 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
SVN commit 8269 by rakuco: Remove www/ from trunk. The website has been on KDE's SVN (and then) git repository for years, so there is no point in keeping this outdate copy around. D www (directory) ___ kde-freebsd mailing list

[kde-freebsd] [SVN Commit] branches

2012-06-02 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
SVN commit 8270 by rakuco: Copy trunk/area51/ into the cmake-without-bundled-libs branch. Let's try to work on this in the open in a work branch. The idea is to make CMake rely on libraries such as curl and libarchive available in base and ports instead of building and using its own copies of

Re: [kde-freebsd] bsd.qt.mk vs bsd.gcc.mk: USE_GCC - CXX - QMAKESPEC

2012-06-02 Thread Alberto Villa
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote: Is there a good reason that QMAKESPEC is derived that early? As far as i remember, no. Could that logic be moved to the main stage? Yes, probably. I will look into it. Thanks for notifying! -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 related bug

2012-06-02 Thread Alberto Villa
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Cameron Berkenpas c...@neo-zeon.de wrote: I'm not sure if this is the correct place to report bugs (this is my 1st time reporting an issue relating to FreeBSD) so feel free to direct me to the correct place. It's OK. Reporting a bug would have been fine too:

Re: [kde-freebsd] bsd.qt.mk vs bsd.gcc.mk: USE_GCC - CXX - QMAKESPEC

2012-06-02 Thread Mel Flynn
On 2-6-2012 10:21, Andriy Gapon wrote: bsd.qt.mk sets QMAKESPEC based on CXX. This is done in the early stage of bsd.port.mk processing (!_POSTMKINCLUDED). bsd.gcc.mk may change CXX value based on USE_GCC (or WITH_GCC/WANT_CC in the future). But this is done in the main stage

Re: [kde-freebsd] bsd.qt.mk vs bsd.gcc.mk: USE_GCC - CXX - QMAKESPEC

2012-06-02 Thread Alberto Villa
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Mel Flynn rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote: I'm setting QMAKESPEC in my shell startup, because bsd.qt.mk hints that when one wants to use ccache one should write their own spec and set QMAKESPEC. So all the work USE_GCC is doing is in vain, unless it overrides

Re: [kde-freebsd] bsd.qt.mk vs bsd.gcc.mk: USE_GCC - CXX - QMAKESPEC

2012-06-02 Thread Mel Flynn
On 2-6-2012 23:10, Alberto Villa wrote: On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Mel Flynn rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote: I'm setting QMAKESPEC in my shell startup, because bsd.qt.mk hints that when one wants to use ccache one should write their own spec and set QMAKESPEC. So all the work USE_GCC is

[kde-freebsd] [SVN Commit] branches/cmake-without-bundled-libs/PORTS/devel/cmake

2012-06-02 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
SVN commit 8271 by rakuco: cmake: Pass --system-libs to the configuration program. We should prefer libraries available in the ports tree over those bundled with a given program: OS-specific adjustments and security fixes are shared, for example. M +6 -1 Makefile M +0 -8

[kde-freebsd] [SVN Commit] branches/cmake-without-bundled-libs/PORTS/devel/cmake

2012-06-02 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
SVN commit 8272 by rakuco: cmake: Explain why the MAKE env var is set. M +1 -1 Makefile ___ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest