[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-11-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Jan Beich (mail not working) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-11-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Jan Beich (mail not working) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #123 from fcsk@gmail.com --- I think we should make a list with tested ports, i mean.. why should i test over 300 ports if 100 of them is already fixed and tested with new boost version ? -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Jan Beich (mail not working) changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|off...@freebsd.org

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Jan Beich (mail not working) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|exp-run?

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #121 from Baptiste Daroussin --- approved (with my office@ hat) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Jan Beich (mail not working) changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #176923|1

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Jan Beich (mail not working) changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #176923|text/plain

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Jan Beich (mail not working) changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #168185|0

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-11-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Andrew Turner changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||213867

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-10-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Jan Beich (mail not working) changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #175960|application/x-shellscript

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-10-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #119 from Jason Bacon --- I've tested 1.62 in my wip collection (https://github.com/outpaddling/freebsd-ports-wip). No issues with the dependent ports I've tried. BTW, biology/unanimity in that same

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-10-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-10-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #118 from fcsk@gmail.com --- (In reply to Don Lewis from comment #117) Send me an email, i need to ask you some questions. Since i never did any contibute intro ports tree. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-10-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #117 from Don Lewis --- Created attachment 175960 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=175960=edit script to find ports that use boost I used the attached script to find ports that

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-10-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #116 from fcsk@gmail.com --- Can anyone make a list of ports where it is used boost? I have enough time to test them all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-10-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #115 from Jason Bacon --- FYI, I renamed the 1.60.0 ports at https://github.com/outpaddling/freebsd-ports-wip to boost*-1.60.0 and have begun upgrading to 1.62.0. Also switched from tar:bzip2 to 7z as the

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-10-16 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #114 from fcsk@gmail.com --- Come on guys, no news about this update? Boost is now on version 1.62 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #112 from Don Lewis --- (In reply to Johannes Jost Meixner from comment #111) See comment #102, though dns/bundy was subsequently fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Johannes Jost Meixner changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-09-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #110 from Andrew Turner --- Is there any update on this? I'd like a later boost for arm64 support as it's blocking a few hundred ports from building. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-08-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #109 from Don Lewis --- The ports listed in #102 should be the complete list, unless something else broke in the meantime. I do know that dns/bundy has already been fixed. If we can get the other ports

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-08-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 darkart changed: What|Removed |Added CC||free...@darkart.com

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-07-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #107 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- I think it has stalled (I haven't worked on it for these past three months). We need someone with enough time to pick this up and continue fixing all ports until we're

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-07-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Markus Kohlmeyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-04-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Bug 199601 depends on bug 207115, which changed state. Bug 207115 Summary: databases/mariadb55-server: mark OQGRAPH broken and allow to disable it properly https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207115 What

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-04-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Bug 199601 depends on bug 207094, which changed state. Bug 207094 Summary: databases/mariadb100-server: mark OQGRAPH broken and allow to disable it properly https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207094 What

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-04-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Bug 199601 depends on bug 207982, which changed state. Bug 207982 Summary: dns/bundy build fails with boost 1.60 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207982 What|Removed |Added

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-04-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Baptiste Daroussin changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-04-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #104 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- (In reply to Manas B from comment #103) > Boost is missing a file: > http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_56_0/boost/core/null_deleter.hpp > > VS. > >

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-04-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Manas B changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #101 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: rakuco Date: Mon Mar 28 19:33:13 UTC 2016 New revision: 412070 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/412070 Log: Remove expired ports.

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Bug 199601 depends on bug 207675, which changed state. Bug 207675 Summary: databases/mariadb101-server - unbreak OQGRAPH option https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207675 What|Removed |Added

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Antoine Brodin changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Antoine Brodin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #165706|0 |1 is

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Antoine Brodin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #167007|0 |1 is

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #98 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- Perhaps it's a good idea to file a new bug for the exp-run, I'm not sure if antoine is reading all the comments here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Don Lewis changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #167577|0 |1 is

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #96 from Don Lewis --- (In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #95) I don't know what other ports depend on them, but I do know they didn't build with OQGRAPH enabled, even with boost 1.55. For

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Don Lewis changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||207697

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Don Lewis changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #162139|0 |1 is

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #91 from Don Lewis --- Should we use the custom make.conf settings or not? It is easier to compare the exp-run results to the unpatched results if we leave make.conf alone, though we do lose some

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #90 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- So qt4-moc has been fixed. I guess the next step is following comment #83? Don, will you take care of it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Bug 199601 depends on bug 208233, which changed state. Bug 208233 Summary: [exp-run] Add more boost macros to qt4-moc https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208233 What|Removed |Added

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #89 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: rakuco Date: Thu Mar 24 10:31:07 UTC 2016 New revision: 411765 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/411765 Log: qt4-moc: Add more Boost

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #88 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- I've finally filed bug 208233 for the qt4-moc exp-run. The patch I'm testing also removes all the obscure patches I mentioned in comment #49 (leaving only a handful that

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Raphael Kubo da Costa changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||208233

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #87 from Don Lewis --- (In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #86 It looks like Dmitry handled the last exp-run. If the qt4-moc patch doesn't require the new boost, then I think it should get

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #86 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- (In reply to Don Lewis from comment #85) I don't have any objections to that -- it just wasn't clear to me at the time if you would drive the exp-run, or if I should ask

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #85 from Don Lewis --- (In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #49) > This attachment contains a patch to devel/qt4-moc that defines more include > guards so that the Boost 1.60 headers that

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Don Lewis changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #168130|0 |1 is

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #81 from Don Lewis --- Fixing dns/bundy will not be fun. See -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Don Lewis changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||207982

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #80 from Don Lewis --- liborcus fails with the same error, but in configure. Configure tries to compile a test program that is basically #include which ends up including resulting in the same breakage

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #79 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- (In reply to Don Lewis from comment #78) > The error is listed in the first comment to PR 207600. I meant the error you're getting with liborcus, not akonadi. > Something

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #78 from Don Lewis --- The error is listed in the first comment to PR 207600. Something like what your are doing for Qt4 might also work, but FreeBSD 9 doesn't have . Where does _LIBCPP_VERSION get

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #77 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- Do you have a link where I can see the full errors you're getting? It's not clear to me why you're going for __GLIBCX__: detecting libstdc++'s version is a royal pain in

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #76 from Don Lewis --- (In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #75) > I'm waiting for replies to my comment in bug 207600. Please keep kde@ in the > loop for changes in akonadi. It appears

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #75 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- (In reply to Don Lewis from comment #74) >* The qt4-moc patch has not yet been committed. I was told in comment #50 that you guys would like an exp-run for this

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #74 from Don Lewis --- Not yet: * The mariadb patches have not yet been committed. * The qt4-moc patch has not yet been committed. * There may be other patches in the cumulative patch that

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #73 from Antoine Brodin --- Is this ready for exp-run ? what is the good patch (there are 6 non obsolete patches) ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Bug 199601 depends on bug 207060, which changed state. Bug 207060 Summary: graphics/mapnik: update to 3.0.9 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207060 What|Removed |Added

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-04 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Bug 199601 depends on bug 207061, which changed state. Bug 207061 Summary: graphics/openimageio: update to 1.5.23 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207061 What|Removed |Added

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-04 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Don Lewis changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||207697

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #71 from Don Lewis --- (In reply to Jung-uk Kim from comment #68) > > BTW, adding '-lboost_system' to LDFLAGS is usually not necessary. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207015#c2 >

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Don Lewis changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||207675

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #70 from Don Lewis --- (In reply to Jung-uk Kim from comment #68) > BTW, adding '-lboost_system' to LDFLAGS is usually not necessary. That's good to know! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #69 from Don Lewis --- (In reply to Jung-uk Kim from comment #67) >> On FreeBSD 9, this will cause the port to be build with clang34++ from ports, >> which causes linkage to the version of libc++ from

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #68 from Jung-uk Kim --- (In reply to Don Lewis from comment #66) > Problems with boost + compiler:c++11-lang on FreeBSD 9 should not be new other > than in ports that were patched to add -lboost_system for

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #67 from Jung-uk Kim --- (In reply to Don Lewis from comment #66) > On FreeBSD 9, this will cause the port to be build with clang34++ from ports, > which causes linkage to the version of libc++ from ports,

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #66 from Don Lewis --- (In reply to Dmitry Marakasov from comment #64) Problems with boost + compiler:c++11-lang on FreeBSD 9 should not be new other than in ports that were patched to add -lboost_system

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-03-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #65 from Don Lewis --- With the cumulative patch, ports tree r409795, the following in make.conf: OPTIONS_SET=REGEX OQGRAPH BOOST MOD_BOOLEAN ASIO MNUMPY DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes and building all

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #63 from Don Lewis --- Looks like we've been making progress. With ports tree r409795 and my newest boost 1.60 patch on FreeBSD 10 amd64: Failed: 17 Skipped: 5Ignored: 11 The failed ports were:

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Dmitry Marakasov changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|off...@freebsd.org

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Dmitry Marakasov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #167564|0 |1

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Dmitry Marakasov changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||207600

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Thierry Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Dmitry Marakasov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #167562|0 |1

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #58 from Dmitry Marakasov --- Created attachment 167562 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=167562=edit Cumulative boost 1.60 update + consumer fixes Here, I think I've managed to put

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #57 from Don Lewis --- (In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #52) I only tested ports that directly depend on boost. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #56 from Dmitry Marakasov --- (In reply to Don Lewis from comment #55) > I'm not seeing that here, even after upgrading the ports tree from r405759, > which is what I originally used to generate and test

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #55 from Don Lewis --- (In reply to Dmitry Marakasov from comment #54) I'm not seeing that here, even after upgrading the ports tree from r405759, which is what I originally used to generate and test the

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Bug 199601 depends on bug 207017, which changed state. Bug 207017 Summary: textproc/libe-book00: fix build with boost 1.60 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207017 What|Removed |Added

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Bug 199601 depends on bug 206999, which changed state. Bug 206999 Summary: textproc/libvisio: fix build with boost 1.60 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206999 What|Removed |Added

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Bug 199601 depends on bug 207016, which changed state. Bug 207016 Summary: textproc/libe-book: fix build with boost 1.60 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207016 What|Removed |Added

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Bug 199601 depends on bug 207015, which changed state. Bug 207015 Summary: textproc/libabw: fix build with boost 1.60 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207015 What|Removed |Added

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Bug 199601 depends on bug 207012, which changed state. Bug 207012 Summary: finance/ledger: update to 3.1.1 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207012 What|Removed |Added

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #53 from Dmitry Marakasov --- Any kind of exp-run with moc patch is needed before committing the patch. Anyway, I plan to start preparing cumulative boost update patch which will include all patches not

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #52 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- (In reply to Dmitry Marakasov from comment #50) > (In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #49) > > > If there's no objection, I'd like to commit it to qt4-moc and

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-16 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Dmitry Marakasov changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||207060

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-16 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #51 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: amdmi3 Date: Tue Feb 16 13:46:46 UTC 2016 New revision: 408995 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/408995 Log: - Fix build with clang

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 --- Comment #50 from Dmitry Marakasov --- (In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #49) > If there's no objection, I'd like to commit it to qt4-moc and remove all > patches added in the revisions above that wrap

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

2016-02-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601 Raphael Kubo da Costa changed: What|Removed |Added CC|