https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||204598
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-qa, patch
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||196862, 205294
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||207750
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
--- Comment #12 from Diane Bruce ---
See https://people.freebsd.org/~db/libgcc_summary.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
--- Comment #11 from Diane Bruce ---
Simpler fix to compiler.mk
Index: compiler.mk
===
--- compiler.mk (revision 416615)
+++ compiler.mk (working copy)
@@
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
--- Comment #10 from Diane Bruce ---
Sure. My original thought was it belonged in cmake.mk anyway! groot@ convinced
me it should go in cmake port itself and myself don't care.
The pkg-message is -Wl,-rpath=%%TARGLIB%%
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
--- Comment #9 from gr...@kde.org ---
.. so far, we've mostly been talking about ports, where the infrastructure
helps with inserting the right linker flags, and comment:7 points out that it
seems to DTRT. But what about non-ports builds?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
--- Comment #8 from gr...@kde.org ---
(In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #7)
> lang/gcc's pkg-message says:
> > To ensure binaries built with this toolchain find appropriate versions
> > of the necessary run-time libraries,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Kubo da Costa ---
Created attachment 168925
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=168925=edit
Self-contained fortran+CMake example
To me, CMake does not seem to be doing
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
--- Comment #6 from Diane Bruce ---
It also affects gcc from ports as well and not just gfortran, though the bug is
not as evident.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
gr...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gr...@kde.org
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
Jeffrey Baitis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@baitis.net
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
Koop Mast changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |k...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
Ian Lepore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
--- Comment #2 from Diane Bruce ---
Uses/cmake.mk could be touched instead.
--- /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/cmake.mk 2016-03-17 15:49:04.0 -0400
+++ /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/cmake.mk.new 2016-03-13 12:36:39.0 -0400
17 matches
Mail list logo