2009/8/30 Thomas Abthorpe :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On August 29, 2009 06:32:24 pm Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
>> In this case, it would be nice if the person who maintains the FreeBSD
>> patches (such as the ones in qt4-corelib I mentioned before) created
>> merge re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On August 29, 2009 06:32:24 pm Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> In this case, it would be nice if the person who maintains the FreeBSD
> patches (such as the ones in qt4-corelib I mentioned before) created
> merge requests via gitorious.
>
> Who is the m
2009/8/24 David Johnson :
>> I remember some time ago (before Qt's source was available over
>> gitorious) that people here were talking about some bad Qt behaviour
>> related to iconv and how it wouldn't be effective to try to talk to
>> the Trolls as they didn't seem to care about FreeBSD, so I w
> I remember some time ago (before Qt's source was available over
> gitorious) that people here were talking about some bad Qt behaviour
> related to iconv and how it wouldn't be effective to try to talk to
> the Trolls as they didn't seem to care about FreeBSD, so I was
> wondering if things have
2009/8/24 Adriaan de Groot :
> On Sunday 23 August 2009 08:47:22 pm Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
>> Today I was looking at the patches used in the Qt ports and noticed
>> maybe some of them (the patches in qt4-corelib, for example) could be
>> merged upstream (either in Qt's tree or kde-qt's tree).
On Sunday 23 August 2009 08:47:22 pm Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> Today I was looking at the patches used in the Qt ports and noticed
> maybe some of them (the patches in qt4-corelib, for example) could be
> merged upstream (either in Qt's tree or kde-qt's tree). Has it ever
> been considered?
Q
Hi there,
Today I was looking at the patches used in the Qt ports and noticed
maybe some of them (the patches in qt4-corelib, for example) could be
merged upstream (either in Qt's tree or kde-qt's tree). Has it ever
been considered?
Cheers,
Raphael
___
