[Bug 227573] devel/cmake build issues with py36

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227573 Matthew Leach changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

[package - head-i386-default][math/kig] Failed for kig-17.12.3 in package

You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server. Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix build. Maintainer: k...@freebsd.org Last committer: tcber...@freebsd.org Ident: $FreeBSD: head/math/kig/Makefile

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

[where did this discussion take place, earlier? this is the first I've seen it -- oh, the ports@ list] So, there are roughly two migration paths: supposing someone has x11/kde4 installed, which has dependencies on many applications and a Plasma 4 desktop, kde@ wants (wanted) to make it

[package - head-amd64-default][math/kig] Failed for kig-17.12.3 in package

You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server. Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix build. Maintainer: k...@freebsd.org Last committer: tcber...@freebsd.org Ident: $FreeBSD: head/math/kig/Makefile

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:42:48 +0200 Adriaan de Groot wrote: > [where did this discussion take place, earlier? this is the first I've seen > it] > > So, there are roughly two migration paths: supposing someone has x11/kde4 > installed, which has dependencies on many

[Bug 227372] [exp-run] Update devel/cmake to 3.11.0

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227372 --- Comment #14 from Mathieu Arnold --- exp-runs never run with bulk -t as there are so many ports that will fail with it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

On 17/04/2018 10:24, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > So, there are roughly two migration paths: supposing someone has x11/kde4 > installed, which has dependencies on many applications and a Plasma 4 > desktop, > kde@ wants (wanted) to make it possible to migrate to a still-KDE4 desktop, > while

[Bug 227573] CMAKE build issues with py36

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227573 Bug ID: 227573 Summary: CMAKE build issues with py36 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: New Severity:

maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 227573] CMAKE build issues with py36

Bugzilla Automation has asked k...@freebsd.org for maintainer-feedback: Bug 227573: CMAKE build issues with py36 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227573 --- Description --- Hi, I am trying to build cmake with the the build options of just MANPAGES with

[Bug 227372] [exp-run] Update devel/cmake to 3.11.0

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227372 --- Comment #16 from John Hein --- (In reply to Adriaan de Groot from comment #13) Maybe there's a way to really force cmake/ccmake/etc. to link with /usr/lib/libarchive.so. Clearly, the InitialCache.cmake addition

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

Am 17.04.18 um 00:42 schrieb Adriaan de Groot: > [where did this discussion take place, earlier? this is the first I've seen > it] Hi Adrian, I did not see this being discussed before, just my posts that explain, why portmaster cannopt deal with the simultanous renaming of ports and packages

[Bug 227573] devel/cmake build issues with py36

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227573 Adriaan de Groot changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

Am 16.04.18 um 21:13 schrieb Tijl Coosemans: > On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:11:33 +0200 Stefan Esser wrote: >> When not even pkg can deal with this situation, how should portmaster? >> >> The packages are built without consideration for the requirements of a >> running system, and pkg

[Bug 227372] [exp-run] Update devel/cmake to 3.11.0

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227372 --- Comment #15 from John Hein --- (In reply to Mathieu Arnold from comment #14) Understood re: no bulk -t for exp-runs. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:19:39 +0200 Tobias C. Berner wrote: > Long answer: KDE is shipped in mulitple, let's call them groups: > - frameworks (libraries to build kde and qt applications) -- we call > these ports kf5-foo > - plasma (the desktop) -- we'll call these ports plasma5-foo > -

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

On 17 April 2018 at 14:00, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 17/04/2018 10:24, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > So, there are roughly two migration paths: supposing someone has > x11/kde4 > > installed, which has dependencies on many applications and a Plasma 4 > desktop, > > kde@ wants

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

Moin moin Here's a script which should automatically fix the origin for the kde4-versioned ports (based on the MOVED entries of r465345): http://people.freebsd.org/~tcberner/scripts/fix_kde4_origins.sh It //should// set the origins properly for the moved ports, and the output should be on the

[Bug 227372] [exp-run] Update devel/cmake to 3.11.0

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227372 --- Comment #17 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: adridg Date: Tue Apr 17 18:00:40 UTC 2018 New revision: 467620 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/467620 Log: Fix stage-qa problems with

[Bug 224185] [cmake] net/ceph and net/ceph-devel: fails to build with boost 1.66

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224185 --- Comment #28 from Adriaan de Groot --- I guess we can close this one then? In the meantime, there's a new generation of broken-with-boost-1.67 PRs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for