[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Jan Beich (mail not working)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||214470


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214470
[Bug 214470] dns/powerdns-recursor: fails to build with boost 1.62
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Jan Beich (mail not working)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||214469


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214469
[Bug 214469] sysutils/facter: fails to build with boost 1.62
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #123 from fcsk@gmail.com ---
I think we should make a list with tested ports, i mean.. why should i test
over 300 ports if 100 of them is already fixed and tested with new boost
version ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Jan Beich (mail not working)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|off...@freebsd.org  |port...@freebsd.org
  Flags||exp-run?
URL||http://www.boost.org/users/
   ||history/

--- Comment #122 from Jan Beich (mail not working)  ---
Can you do another exp-run on 10.1 and 9.3? Boost 1.62 may have new fallout
compared to 1.60.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Jan Beich (mail not working)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|exp-run?|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #121 from Baptiste Daroussin  ---
approved (with my office@ hat)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Jan Beich (mail not working)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #176923|1   |0
   is patch||

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Jan Beich (mail not working)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #176923|text/plain  |application/x-xz
  mime type||

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Jan Beich (mail not working)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #168185|0   |1
is obsolete||
 Attachment #168588|0   |1
is obsolete||
 CC||jbe...@freebsd.org

--- Comment #120 from Jan Beich (mail not working)  ---
Created attachment 176923
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=176923=edit
boost 1.62 + long double fix + libreoffice4 fix (+ commit message)

- Update to 1.62
- Drop .so.MAJOR compatibility links

Hmm, `long double` fix reminds me of bug 193528 and also checks
__FreeBSD_version__ without  or .

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Andrew Turner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||213867


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213867
[Bug 213867] devel/boost-libs fails to build on arm64
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Jan Beich (mail not working)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #175960|application/x-shellscript   |text/plain
  mime type||

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #119 from Jason Bacon  ---
I've tested 1.62 in my wip collection
(https://github.com/outpaddling/freebsd-ports-wip).  No issues with the
dependent ports I've tried.

BTW, biology/unanimity in that same collection does not build with boost 1.5x.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Ed Maste  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
   ||gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2138
   ||67

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #118 from fcsk@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Don Lewis from comment #117)
Send me an email, i need to ask you some questions. Since i never did any
contibute intro ports tree.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #117 from Don Lewis  ---
Created attachment 175960
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=175960=edit
script to find ports that use boost

I used the attached script to find ports that directly use boost.  The
make.conf referenced by the script contains:
 OPTIONS_SET=REGEX OQGRAPH BOOST MOD_BOOLEAN ASIO MNUMPY
 DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes
to set some non-default options to detect some ports that don't use boost in
their default configuration.

I seem to recall that building the set of ports that this script detects took
16-18 hours on my 8-core package build machine for one arch + OS version combo.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #116 from fcsk@gmail.com ---
Can anyone make a list of ports where it is used boost? I have enough time to
test them all.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #115 from Jason Bacon  ---

FYI, I renamed the 1.60.0 ports at
https://github.com/outpaddling/freebsd-ports-wip to boost*-1.60.0 and have
begun upgrading to 1.62.0.

Also switched from tar:bzip2 to 7z as the distfiles are smaller.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #114 from fcsk@gmail.com ---
Come on guys, no news about this update? Boost is now on version 1.62

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #112 from Don Lewis  ---
(In reply to Johannes Jost Meixner from comment #111)
See comment #102, though dns/bundy was subsequently fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Johannes Jost Meixner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||x...@freebsd.org

--- Comment #111 from Johannes Jost Meixner  ---
Do we have a list of ports that actually break with boost 1.60 ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #110 from Andrew Turner  ---
Is there any update on this? I'd like a later boost for arm64 support as it's
blocking a few hundred ports from building.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #109 from Don Lewis  ---
The ports listed in #102 should be the complete list, unless something else
broke in the meantime.  I do know that dns/bundy has already been fixed.  If we
can get the other ports fixed, then we can request another exp-run.  That will
try to build everything for multiple FreeBSD versions, and the results will be
compared to builds without the boost upgrade.

For my initial work, I made a list of just the ports that referenced boost in
BUILD_DEPENDS and LIB_DEPENDS.  That's about 300 ports.  With their
dependencies thrown in, the total number of ports that need to be built is a
bit over 1000.  I've got an 8 core machine that I use for package building, and
it took between one and two days to build those ports for FreeBSD 10 amd64.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

darkart  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||free...@darkart.com

--- Comment #108 from darkart  ---
If someone did want to help out resolving this bug, how does one get a list of
what needs to be fixed (beyond what's listed above)?  Is there a system that
can be used to do port builds to make sure everything that uses boost works?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #107 from Raphael Kubo da Costa  ---
I think it has stalled (I haven't worked on it for these past three months). We
need someone with enough time to pick this up and continue fixing all ports
until we're ready to go.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Markus Kohlmeyer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rootserv...@gmail.com

--- Comment #106 from Markus Kohlmeyer  ---
After three months without any viewable progress:

What is the current state of this update?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601
Bug 199601 depends on bug 207115, which changed state.

Bug 207115 Summary: databases/mariadb55-server: mark OQGRAPH broken and allow 
to disable it properly
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207115

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|New |Closed
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601
Bug 199601 depends on bug 207094, which changed state.

Bug 207094 Summary: databases/mariadb100-server: mark OQGRAPH broken and allow 
to disable it properly
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207094

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|In Progress |Closed
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601
Bug 199601 depends on bug 207982, which changed state.

Bug 207982 Summary: dns/bundy build fails with boost 1.60
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207982

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|New |Closed
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Baptiste Daroussin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fcsk@gmail.com

--- Comment #105 from Baptiste Daroussin  ---
*** Bug 208812 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #104 from Raphael Kubo da Costa  ---
(In reply to Manas B from comment #103)
> Boost is missing a file:
> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_56_0/boost/core/null_deleter.hpp
> 
> VS.
> 
> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/boost/core/null_deleter.hpp
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by missing; from the looks of it it just
appears that this header did not exist before Boost 1.56.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Manas B  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||b.manas...@gmail.com

--- Comment #103 from Manas B  ---
Thanks for all your efforts.

I just wanted to leave a comment:

I installed devel/boost-all from ports today in order to build Hadouken:
https://github.com/hadouken/hadouken

Boost is missing a file:
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_56_0/boost/core/null_deleter.hpp

VS.

http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/boost/core/null_deleter.hpp

Manas

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #101 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:

Author: rakuco
Date: Mon Mar 28 19:33:13 UTC 2016
New revision: 412070
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/412070

Log:
  Remove expired ports.

  2016-03-26 textproc/libvisio: Not used any more
  2016-03-26 textproc/libe-book00: Not used any more

  Not only do these two ports have newer versions in the tree
  (textproc/libvisio01 and textproc/libe-book, respectively), but they were
  failing to build with the upcoming Boost 1.60.

  PR:   199601

Changes:
  head/MOVED
  head/textproc/Makefile
  head/textproc/libe-book00/
  head/textproc/libvisio/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601
Bug 199601 depends on bug 207675, which changed state.

Bug 207675 Summary: databases/mariadb101-server - unbreak OQGRAPH option
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207675

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|In Progress |Closed
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Antoine Brodin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||port...@freebsd.org
   Assignee|port...@freebsd.org |anto...@freebsd.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Antoine Brodin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #165706|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #100 from Antoine Brodin  ---
Comment on attachment 165706
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=165706
Patch for www/anyterm to work with boost 1.60

Obsolete: committed in PORTS r408416

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Antoine Brodin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #167007|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #99 from Antoine Brodin  ---
Comment on attachment 167007
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=167007
devel/qt4-moc patch with additional Boost include guards

Obsolete: committed in PORTS r411765

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #98 from Raphael Kubo da Costa  ---
Perhaps it's a good idea to file a new bug for the exp-run, I'm not sure if
antoine is reading all the comments here.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Don Lewis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #167577|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #97 from Don Lewis  ---
Created attachment 168588
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=168588=edit
combined boost 1.60 upgrade and libreoffice4 fix for boost 1.60 patch

Combine the updated patch to upgrade boost 1.60 and the patch to fix the
libreoffice4 build from bug #207697 with 1.60 into a single patch for the
exp-run.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #96 from Don Lewis  ---
(In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #95)

I don't know what other ports depend on them, but I do know they didn't build
with OQGRAPH enabled, even with boost 1.55.

For the exp-run, I think we can get away with just the boost patch and the
libreoffice4 patch.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Don Lewis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||207697
 Depends on|207697  |


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207697
[Bug 207697] editors/libreoffice4: fix build with boost 1.60
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Don Lewis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #162139|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #92 from Don Lewis  ---
Comment on attachment 162139
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=162139
updated patch to upgrade to boost 1.58

We won't be updating boost to 1.58, so mark the patch to do so as obsolete.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #91 from Don Lewis  ---
Should we use the custom make.conf settings or not?  It is easier to compare
the exp-run results to the unpatched results if we leave make.conf alone,
though we do lose some coverage.  If we use the stock make.conf, then we could
omit the mariadb patches since these ports don't use boost with their default
option settings.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #90 from Raphael Kubo da Costa  ---
So qt4-moc has been fixed. I guess the next step is following comment #83? Don,
will you take care of it?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601
Bug 199601 depends on bug 208233, which changed state.

Bug 208233 Summary: [exp-run] Add more boost macros to qt4-moc
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208233

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|Open|Closed
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #89 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:

Author: rakuco
Date: Thu Mar 24 10:31:07 UTC 2016
New revision: 411765
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/411765

Log:
  qt4-moc: Add more Boost include guards to moc's definition list.

  In preparation for updating Boost to 1.60, add include guards from more Boost
  headers to the list of macros that moc automatically defines when processing
  files. As explained in r408911, Qt4's moc cannot parse some constructs used
by
  a few Boost headers, so we define their include guards to make moc skip them.

  This is a cleaner approach that allows us to largely revert r408472, r408473,
  r408474, r408475, r408502, r408773 and r408419, which added several patches
to
  many ports to work around this moc bug.

  PR:   199601
  PR:   208322

Changes:
  head/audio/clementine-player/files/patch-src_core_mergedproxymodel.h
  head/audio/clementine-player/files/patch-src_library_groupbydialog.h
  head/cad/openscad/files/
  head/devel/qt4-moc/files/patch-src__tools__moc__main.cpp
  head/graphics/aqsis/files/patch-include_aqsis_tex_buffers_channellist.h
  head/graphics/aqsis/files/patch-include_aqsis_tex_buffers_mixedimagebuffer.h
  head/graphics/aqsis/files/patch-include_aqsis_util_socket.h
  head/graphics/aqsis/files/patch-tools_piqsl_displayserverimage.cpp
  head/graphics/aqsis/files/patch-tools_piqsl_image.h
  head/graphics/evolvotron/files/patch-libfunction_useful.h
  head/multimedia/gstreamer-qt4/files/
  head/net-p2p/namecoin/files/patch-src_allocators.h
  head/net-p2p/namecoin/files/patch-src_qt_guiutil.h
  head/net-p2p/namecoin/files/patch-src_util.h
  head/science/avogadro/files/patch-libavogadro_src_pythonengine__p.h
  head/science/avogadro/files/patch-libavogadro_src_pythonextension__p.h
  head/science/avogadro/files/patch-libavogadro_src_pythoninterpreter.h
  head/science/avogadro/files/patch-libavogadro_src_pythonscript.h
  head/science/avogadro/files/patch-libavogadro_src_pythontool__p.h

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #88 from Raphael Kubo da Costa  ---
I've finally filed bug 208233 for the qt4-moc exp-run. The patch I'm testing
also removes all the obscure patches I mentioned in comment #49 (leaving only a
handful that did not add #ifndef Q_MOC_RUN bits).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Raphael Kubo da Costa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||208233


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208233
[Bug 208233] [exp-run] Add more boost macros to qt4-moc
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #87 from Don Lewis  ---
(In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #86

It looks like Dmitry handled the last exp-run.  If the qt4-moc patch doesn't
require the new boost, then I think it should get committed before the the
boost exp-run.

Probably the least confusing thing to do is to create a new PR for the qt4-moc
patch and request an exp-run for that along with the other changes mentioned in
comment #49 (or revert them before the exp-run).  List that PR as a blocker for
this one.

If the exp-run looks OK, then commit those changes, and then we can request the
boost exp-run which will have a much shorter list of changes to test.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #86 from Raphael Kubo da Costa  ---
(In reply to Don Lewis from comment #85)
I don't have any objections to that -- it just wasn't clear to me at the time
if you would drive the exp-run, or if I should ask for it, or whether you'd
prefer to just land everything at once (plus comment #53 mentioned everything
would be at least tested all at once).

I'm definitely in favor of smaller patches, so let me know if you need help
with the qt4-moc exp-run.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #85 from Don Lewis  ---
(In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #49)

> This attachment contains a patch to devel/qt4-moc that defines more include
> guards so that the Boost 1.60 headers that include the headers moc can't parse
> (basically, any header that uses macros in a namespace declaration) are
> skipped. I was able to build all ports in 
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/BoostPortingProject/1.55-to-1.60 that were failing
> because of moc without having to patch any of them at all (basically reverting
> most of ports r408472, ports r408473, ports r408474, ports r408475, ports
> r408502, ports r408773, ports r408419, but also including all ports with a
> column saying "fixed by qt4-moc patch").
>
> If there's no objection, I'd like to commit it to qt4-moc and remove all
> patches added in the revisions above that wrap Boost includes within #ifndef
> Q_MOC_RUN blocks.

Is there any reason that we shouldn't do an exp-run and commit this before
doing the boost upgrade exp-run?  That would reduce the number of moving parts
for the boost upgrade.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Don Lewis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #168130|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #82 from Don Lewis  ---
Created attachment 168185
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=168185=edit
updated patch to upgrade to boost 1.60 (and also add long double support for
recent FreeBSD)

Update the boost 1.60 upgrade patch with an extra patch,
files/patch-boost_config_compiler_clang.hpp, to handle the lack of complete
c++11 support on FreeBSD 9.x when building consumers with base clang and
libstdc++ bundled with base gcc.

This is a variant of my patch from comment #80 that make it more convenient to
disable other features on FreeBSD 9.x if needed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #81 from Don Lewis  ---
Fixing dns/bundy will not be fun.  See


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Don Lewis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||207982


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207982
[Bug 207982] dns/bundy build fails with boost 1.60
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #80 from Don Lewis  ---
liborcus fails with the same error, but in configure.  Configure tries to
compile a test program that is basically
  #include 
which ends up including  resulting in the same breakage as 
seen with akonadi.

My boost patch doesn't fix that because none of the stdc++ headers that result
in __GLIBCXX__ getting defined have been included at that point.

I kind of hate to do a #include inside clang.hpp because of the extra
pollution, but that might be the best way forward.  That would fix liborcus as
well as
akonadi.

Both liborcus and akonadi compile with this patch applied to boost:

--- boost/config/compiler/clang.hpp.orig2015-12-08 18:55:19 UTC
+++ boost/config/compiler/clang.hpp
@@ -169,6 +169,14 @@

 #if !__has_feature(cxx_rvalue_references)
 #  define BOOST_NO_CXX11_RVALUE_REFERENCES
+#else
+/*
+ * Workaround for clang on FreeBSD 9.x using ancient libstdc++.
+ */
+#  include 
+#  if !defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION)
+#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_RVALUE_REFERENCES
+#  endif
 #endif

 #if !__has_feature(cxx_strong_enums)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #79 from Raphael Kubo da Costa  ---
(In reply to Don Lewis from comment #78)
> The error is listed in the first comment to PR 207600.
I meant the error you're getting with liborcus, not akonadi.

> Something like what your are doing for Qt4 might also work, but FreeBSD 9
> doesn't have .
It does, it's a standard C++ header. On ref9-amd64.freebsd.org, for example,
it's in /usr/include/c++/4.2/ciso646.

> Where does _LIBCPP_VERSION get defined?
In /usr/include/c++/v1/__config (if you have libc++ installed). It is included
by other headers shipped by libc++, including ciso646.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #78 from Don Lewis  ---
The error is listed in the first comment to PR 207600.

Something like what your are doing for Qt4 might also work, but FreeBSD 9
doesn't have .  Where does _LIBCPP_VERSION get defined?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #77 from Raphael Kubo da Costa  ---
Do you have a link where I can see the full errors you're getting?

It's not clear to me why you're going for __GLIBCX__: detecting libstdc++'s
version is a royal pain in the ass and IIRC the __GLIBCXX__ macro was not very
precise in determining which version it corresponds to.

You might want to take a look at what we do in Qt4
(devel/qt4/files/extrapatch-src-corelib-global-qglobal.h) and Qt5
(devel/qt5/files/extrapatch-src_corelib_global_qcompilerdetection.h):
  * In Qt4 we only enable support for initializer lists (which must be
supported by both the compiler and the standard library) with clang if and only
if it's being used with libc++, under the assumption that clang and libstdc++
generally means it's FreeBSD 9 with clang and base libstdc++. We verify that by
including a header that does nothing (ciso646) and then checking if that
indirectly defined _LIBCPP_VERSION.
  * In Qt5 we do pretty much the same thing, but extend the check for other
features that are probably used by boost too.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #76 from Don Lewis  ---
(In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #75)

> I'm waiting for replies to my comment in bug 207600. Please keep kde@ in the
> loop for changes in akonadi.

It appears possible to patch boost so that akonadi builds without any further
changes.

--- boost/config/compiler/clang.hpp.orig2015-12-08 18:55:19 UTC
+++ boost/config/compiler/clang.hpp
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@
 #  define BOOST_NO_CXX11_UNIFIED_INITIALIZATION_SYNTAX
 #endif

-#if !__has_feature(cxx_rvalue_references)
+#if !__has_feature(cxx_rvalue_references) || (defined(__GLIBCXX__) &&
__GLIBCXX__ < 20080606)
 #  define BOOST_NO_CXX11_RVALUE_REFERENCES
 #endif

devel/liborcus runs into the same problem, but the above patch is not
sufficient.  It relies on one of a number of c++ headers having already been
included in order to bring in  so that __GLIBCXX__ gets
defined.  The liborcus source is OK, but configure has a problem and thinks
that  is not usable.  The following ugly patch to
configure fixes that:

--- configure.orig  2015-06-18 23:43:37 UTC
+++ configure
@@ -18668,7 +18668,8 @@ ac_link='$CXX -o conftest$ac_exeext $CXX
 ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_cxx_compiler_gnu
 boost_save_CPPFLAGS=$CPPFLAGS
 CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS $BOOST_CPPFLAGS"
-ac_fn_cxx_check_header_mongrel "$LINENO" "boost/filesystem/path.hpp"
"ac_cv_header_boost_filesystem_path_hpp" "$ac_includes_default"
+ac_fn_cxx_check_header_mongrel "$LINENO" "boost/filesystem/path.hpp"
"ac_cv_header_boost_filesystem_path_hpp" "$ac_includes_default
+#include "
 if test "x$ac_cv_header_boost_filesystem_path_hpp" = xyes; then :

 $as_echo "#define HAVE_BOOST_FILESYSTEM_PATH_HPP 1" >>confdefs.h
@@ -18720,6 +18721,7 @@ else
   # Generate the test file.
   cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
 /* end confdefs.h.  */
+#include 
 #include 

 int


Does this look like a reasonable direction to take?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #75 from Raphael Kubo da Costa  ---
(In reply to Don Lewis from comment #74)
>* The qt4-moc patch has not yet been committed.

I was told in comment #50 that you guys would like an exp-run for this change,
and in comment #53 it was indicated you guys would prefer to test it with the
rest of the required changes instead of landing this separately and before the
rest.

>* I'm looking into the FreeBSD 9.x issues.  I'm currently
>  testing a patch to boost to fix databases/akonadi.

I'm waiting for replies to my comment in bug 207600. Please keep kde@ in the
loop for changes in akonadi.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #74 from Don Lewis  ---
Not yet:

   * The mariadb patches have not yet been committed.

   * The qt4-moc patch has not yet been committed.

   * There may be other patches in the cumulative patch that
 should be committed.

   * I don't believe we have a fix for dns/bundy

   * I'm looking into the FreeBSD 9.x issues.  I'm currently
 testing a patch to boost to fix databases/akonadi.

libreoffice4 is a chicken vs. egg problem.  My patch to fix it
breaks it with boost 1.55.

Obviously we can ignore the patches to upgrade to 1.58 and 1.59.  I believe the
www/anyterm patch has been committed.

The "updated patch to upgrade boost to 1.60 ..." patch is the latest one to
upgrade boost itself, but there may be other changes for the FreeBSD 9.x
issues.

The cumulative patch included an older version of the boost patch and needs to
be regenerated to bring it up to date for the latest boost changes and probably
for other changes that have been committed to other ports.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #73 from Antoine Brodin  ---
Is this ready for exp-run ?  what is the good patch (there are 6 non obsolete
patches) ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601
Bug 199601 depends on bug 207060, which changed state.

Bug 207060 Summary: graphics/mapnik: update to 3.0.9
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207060

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|In Progress |Closed
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601
Bug 199601 depends on bug 207061, which changed state.

Bug 207061 Summary: graphics/openimageio: update to 1.5.23
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207061

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|Open|Closed
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Don Lewis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||207697


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207697
[Bug 207697] editors/libreoffice4: fix build with boost 1.60
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #71 from Don Lewis  ---
(In reply to Jung-uk Kim from comment #68)
> 
> BTW, adding '-lboost_system' to LDFLAGS is usually not necessary.
> 
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207015#c2
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207016#c2

That doesn't seem to be compatible with boost 1.55.0.  I tried the fix for
libreoffice4 and got this failure:

In file included from
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice4/work/libreoffice-4.3.7.2/sc/qa/unit/helper/qahelper.cxx:10:
In file included from
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice4/work/libreoffice-4.3.7.2/sc/qa/unit/helper/qahelper.hxx:14:
In file included from
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice4/work/libreoffice-4.3.7.2/sc/qa/unit/helper/debughelper.hxx:27:
In file included from /usr/local/include/mdds/mixed_type_matrix.hpp:33:
In file included from /usr/local/include/mdds/mixed_type_matrix_storage.hpp:39:
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/pool/object_pool.hpp:18:
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/pool/poolfwd.hpp:24:
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/pool/detail/mutex.hpp:14:
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/thread/mutex.hpp:16:
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/thread/pthread/mutex.hpp:12:
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/thread/exceptions.hpp:22:
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/system/system_error.hpp:14:
/usr/local/include/boost/system/error_code.hpp:516:13: fatal error:
'boost/../libs/system/src/error_code.cpp' file not found
#   include 
^

The problem is that error_code.hpp contains:

# ifdef BOOST_ERROR_CODE_HEADER_ONLY
#   include 
# endif

and error_code.cpp is not installed.  I think this was fixed in boost 1.56.0.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Don Lewis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||207675


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207675
[Bug 207675] databases/mariadb101-server - unbreak OQGRAPH option
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #70 from Don Lewis  ---
(In reply to Jung-uk Kim from comment #68)
> BTW, adding '-lboost_system' to LDFLAGS is usually not necessary.

That's good to know!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #69 from Don Lewis  ---
(In reply to Jung-uk Kim from comment #67)
>> On FreeBSD 9, this will cause the port to be build with clang34++ from ports,
>> which causes linkage to the version of libc++ from ports, whereas boost is
>> compiled with the base c++ compiler (normally g++ on FreeBSD 9), and is 
>> linked
> to the base libstdc++.
>
> It is not true.  9.3 is the oldest supported version and it has LLVM/Clang 
> 3.4.

If that's the case I think things should work since I think the base clang in
9.3 links with libstdc++.  Someone can still break it though if they build
their system without clang.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #68 from Jung-uk Kim  ---
(In reply to Don Lewis from comment #66)
> Problems with boost + compiler:c++11-lang on FreeBSD 9 should not be new other
> than in ports that were patched to add -lboost_system for compatibility with
> the new version of boost.

BTW, adding '-lboost_system' to LDFLAGS is usually not necessary.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207015#c2
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207016#c2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #67 from Jung-uk Kim  ---
(In reply to Don Lewis from comment #66)
> On FreeBSD 9, this will cause the port to be build with clang34++ from ports,
> which causes linkage to the version of libc++ from ports, whereas boost is
> compiled with the base c++ compiler (normally g++ on FreeBSD 9), and is linked
> to the base libstdc++.

It is not true.  9.3 is the oldest supported version and it has LLVM/Clang 3.4.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #66 from Don Lewis  ---
(In reply to Dmitry Marakasov from comment #64)

Problems with boost + compiler:c++11-lang on FreeBSD 9 should not be new other
than in ports that were patched to add -lboost_system for compatibility with
the new version of boost.  This generally doesn't show up at build time, but
rather as a fatal runtime problem.

On FreeBSD 9, this will cause the port to be build with clang34++ from ports,
which causes linkage to the version of libc++ from ports, whereas boost is
compiled with the base c++ compiler (normally g++ on FreeBSD 9), and is linked
to the base libstdc++.  Mixing these two libraries in the same executable is
fatal.

Tweaking the port to use c++11-lib is likely to work better since it will use
the default ports version of gcc to compile the port.  That will usually work
as long as the runtime linker pulls in the version of libstdc++ bundled with
the ports gcc rather than the version of libstdc++ in base.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #65 from Don Lewis  ---
With the cumulative patch, ports tree r409795, the following in make.conf:
  OPTIONS_SET=REGEX OQGRAPH BOOST MOD_BOOLEAN ASIO MNUMPY
  DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes
and building all the ports that depend on boost-libs and the other ports
modified by the patch, the only breakage that I see on FreeBSD 10.1 amd64 is:

  dns/bundy:build
  databases/mariadb101-server:build
  editors/libreoffice4:build

The OQGRAPH_USE option in mariadb101-server should be marked as broken on
FreeBSD >= 10.  Even if the build managed to succeed, the resulting executable
would segfault on startup because mixing:
  OQGRAPH_USE= gcc=yes
to compile the port with g++ and then linking it to libboost_system.so which is
compiled with the base clang++ is a fatal combination.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #63 from Don Lewis  ---
Looks like we've been making progress.  With ports tree r409795 and my newest
boost 1.60 patch on FreeBSD 10 amd64:
 Failed: 17   Skipped: 5Ignored: 11

The failed ports were:
 databases/mariadb100-server:build  (fix not committed yet)
 databases/mariadb101-server:build  (new)
 databases/mariadb55-server:package (fix not committed yet)
 deskutils/kdepim4:build
 devel/kdevplatform:build
 dns/bundy:build(new)
 editors/libreoffice4:build (returned)
 games/plee-the-bear:build
 graphics/mapnik:build  (fix not committed yet)
 graphics/py-openimageio:build  (fix not committed yet)
 graphics/scantailor:build  (patch committed r408592, still
failing)
 math/pdal:build(switch to bundled boost)
 multimedia/gstreamer1-qt4:build
 security/quantis:build
 textproc/libe-book00:build (deprecated)
 textproc/libvisio:build(deprecated)
 x11/leeccraft:build

This did not include the qt4-moc patch, which may fix some of the
remaining failures.

Build failure logs here:

https://people.freebsd.org/~truckman/boost-1.60_fallout/r409795/FreeBSD-10.1-amd64/

I'll try to try to test the combined patch, but adding build tests for things
that depend on qt4-moc adds a lot more ports to test.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Dmitry Marakasov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|off...@freebsd.org  |port...@freebsd.org
  Flags||exp-run?

--- Comment #62 from Dmitry Marakasov  ---
Requesting an exp-run of latest cumulative patch
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=167577 on 10.x and 9.x.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Dmitry Marakasov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #167564|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #61 from Dmitry Marakasov  ---
Created attachment 167577
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=167577=edit
Cumulative boost 1.60 update + consumer fixes

Added databases/akonadi fix on 9.x (see
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207600)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Dmitry Marakasov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||207600


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207600
[Bug 207600] databases/akonadi: fix build with boost 1.60 on 9.x
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Thierry Thomas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||thie...@freebsd.org

--- Comment #60 from Thierry Thomas  ---
Note about cad/kicad: trying to upgrade this port to the latest (4.0.2 ATM), it
fails with an error caused by boost::hash. Upstream says to upgrade boost to at
least 1.56.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Dmitry Marakasov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #167562|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #59 from Dmitry Marakasov  ---
Created attachment 167564
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=167564=edit
Cumulative boost 1.60 update + consumer fixes

(Reupload the patch with correct mime type)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #58 from Dmitry Marakasov  ---
Created attachment 167562
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=167562=edit
Cumulative boost 1.60 update + consumer fixes

Here, I think I've managed to put it all together. I've tested it in poudriere
on truckman's failure list + some extra ports.

Summary:
- boost update to 1.60 (unmodified
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=166861)
- qt4-moc patch (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=167007 +
portrevision bump)
- consumer port fixes not committed yet
  - databases/mariadb55-server
  - databases/mariadb100-server
  - graphics/mapnik
  - graphics/py-openimageio (through graphics/openimageio)
- some second-tier updates (updates required by updates required by boost
update)
  - astro/viking (blocks mapnik update)
  - graphics/openshadinglanguage (blocks openimageio update)
  - graphics/luxrender (blocks openimageio update)
- couple of ports marked BROKEN
  - games/plee-the-bear (my port, will deal with it separately)
  - textproc/libe-book00, textproc/libvisio (they are deprecated anyway, fixes
rejected)
- several rollbacks of moc-related fixes (#ifndef Q_MOC_RUN) which are no
longer needed with proper qt4-moc patch
  - audio/clementine-player
  - cad/openscad
  - graphics/aqsis
  - graphics/evolvotron
  - multimedia/gstreamer-qt4
  - net-p2p/namecoin
  - science/avogadro
- math/pdal fixed by switching to bundled boost

First of all, I'd like to request an exp-run for this patch. It'll confirm
there are no other boost failures left and qt4-moc update doesn't introduce
additional problems.

Next, I plan to commit all consumer and consumer of consumer fixes this week,
they are mainly pending maintainer timeouts.

Finally, I'd like someone to comment on when we can commit this WRT
10.3-RELEASE. My idea is that it can only hit the tree after the release.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #57 from Don Lewis  ---
(In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #52)

I only tested ports that directly depend on boost.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #56 from Dmitry Marakasov  ---
(In reply to Don Lewis from comment #55)

> I'm not seeing that here, even after upgrading the ports tree from r405759,
> which is what I originally used to generate and test the patch, to r409705.
> I tested with 10.1-RELEASE-p27 amd64.  No problems with 10.3-PRERELEASE
> r295020, either.

Right, I've lost a boost patch related to long double support, with it it does
build fine.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #55 from Don Lewis  ---
(In reply to Dmitry Marakasov from comment #54)

I'm not seeing that here, even after upgrading the ports tree from r405759,
which is what I originally used to generate and test the patch, to r409705.
I tested with 10.1-RELEASE-p27 amd64.  No problems with 10.3-PRERELEASE
r295020, either.

The actual error is happening earlier.  It looks like something is preventing
the math libraries from building.  Are you using any non-default options or
CFLAGS?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601
Bug 199601 depends on bug 207017, which changed state.

Bug 207017 Summary: textproc/libe-book00: fix build with boost 1.60
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207017

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|New |Closed
 Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601
Bug 199601 depends on bug 206999, which changed state.

Bug 206999 Summary: textproc/libvisio: fix build with boost 1.60
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206999

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|New |Closed
 Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601
Bug 199601 depends on bug 207016, which changed state.

Bug 207016 Summary: textproc/libe-book: fix build with boost 1.60
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207016

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|In Progress |Closed
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601
Bug 199601 depends on bug 207015, which changed state.

Bug 207015 Summary: textproc/libabw: fix build with boost 1.60
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207015

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|In Progress |Closed
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601
Bug 199601 depends on bug 207012, which changed state.

Bug 207012 Summary: finance/ledger: update to 3.1.1
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207012

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|New |Closed
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #53 from Dmitry Marakasov  ---
Any kind of exp-run with moc patch is needed before committing the patch.
Anyway, I plan to start preparing cumulative boost update patch which will
include all patches not committed to the tree yet as well as rollbacks of
patches not needed with this moc patch. Exp-run with that patch will test both
the moc, all the fixes and rollbacks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #52 from Raphael Kubo da Costa  ---
(In reply to Dmitry Marakasov from comment #50)
> (In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #49)
> 
> > If there's no objection, I'd like to commit it to qt4-moc and remove all
> > patches added in the revisions above that wrap Boost includes within #ifndef
> > Q_MOC_RUN blocks.
> 
> I'm ok with that, however it'll require an exp-run.

Do you mean an exp-run with the existing ports tree and Boost 1.55 or another
exp-run by truckman@ with a tree using Boost 1.60?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Dmitry Marakasov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||207060


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207060
[Bug 207060] graphics/mapnik: needs update
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #51 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:

Author: amdmi3
Date: Tue Feb 16 13:46:46 UTC 2016
New revision: 408995
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/408995

Log:
  - Fix build with clang 1.60

  PR:   199601
  Approved by:  portmgr blanket

Changes:
  head/graphics/mitsuba/files/patch-src_bsdfs_irawan.h

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

--- Comment #50 from Dmitry Marakasov  ---
(In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #49)

> If there's no objection, I'd like to commit it to qt4-moc and remove all
> patches added in the revisions above that wrap Boost includes within #ifndef
> Q_MOC_RUN blocks.

I'm ok with that, however it'll require an exp-run.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

[kde-freebsd] [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601

Raphael Kubo da Costa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||k...@freebsd.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information