[Bug 213331] USES=gmake can break CMAKE_NINJA=yes

2017-06-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213331 Tobias C. Berner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|Closed Resolution|---

[Bug 213331] USES=gmake can break CMAKE_NINJA=yes

2017-06-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213331 --- Comment #6 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: tcberner Date: Sun Jun 25 21:08:06 UTC 2017 New revision: 444324 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/444324 Log: Make ninja opt-out in cmak

[Bug 213331] USES=gmake can break CMAKE_NINJA=yes

2017-06-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213331 Tobias C. Berner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcber...@freebsd.org

[Bug 213331] USES=gmake can break CMAKE_NINJA=yes

2016-12-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213331 --- Comment #5 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- (In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #4) > I think that there should be an exp-run with CMAKE_NINJA=yes and USES=gmake > neutralized to determine what are the actual needs of the ports: > >

[Bug 213331] USES=gmake can break CMAKE_NINJA=yes

2016-12-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213331 Antoine Brodin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open --- Comment #4 from Antoine

[Bug 213331] USES=gmake can break CMAKE_NINJA=yes

2016-10-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213331 --- Comment #3 from Antoine Brodin --- (In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #2) This will still bring gmake in the build depends. Maybe a USES= cmake:something, which brings either gmake.mk or ninja.mk depending on CMAKE_NINJA?

[Bug 213331] USES=gmake can break CMAKE_NINJA=yes

2016-10-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213331 --- Comment #2 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- (In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #1) > Can't you use something like this? > > .if !defined(CMAKE_NINJA) > USES+= gmake > .endif The problem with this is that it adds a burden to every s

[Bug 213331] USES=gmake can break CMAKE_NINJA=yes

2016-10-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213331 --- Comment #1 from Antoine Brodin --- I think that a port should have only 1 USES that sets MAKE_CMD. If it needs 2 tools, like scons calling gmake, it should have USES=scons + a build dependency on gmake. Can't you use something like th

[Bug 213331] USES=gmake can break CMAKE_NINJA=yes

2016-10-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213331 Raphael Kubo da Costa changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|USES=gmake can override |USES=gmake can break