Terve,
Dimanche, le 11 avril 2010, à 19:08, Tuomo Penttinen a écrit:
Hello all,
On Fri, April 9, 2010 4:20 pm, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Vendredi, le 9 avril 2010, à 03:15, Tuomo Penttinen a écrit:
On Wed, April 7, 2010 3:09 pm, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Mardi, le 6 avril
hiya,
It will be very tied to the KIO-slave implementation actually, since
KIO does not have a standardized query method, and UPnP also has
sorting, filtering, etc. So we rely on those to be implemented in a
certain way. It's not as simple as using a generic KIO Collection.
You mean: UPnP
Vendredi, le 9 avril 2010, à 03:15, Tuomo Penttinen a écrit:
Hello all,
On Wed, April 7, 2010 3:09 pm, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Hi all (and Tuomo),
Mardi, le 6 avril 2010, à 23:41, Kevin Ottens a écrit:
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 14:42:03 Tuomo Penttinen wrote:
I agree. The
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 14:42:03 Tuomo Penttinen wrote:
I agree. The UPnP discovery protocol is lightweight enough that I wouldn't
worry about it in most environments.
Actually I like numbers. :-)
My worry lies in the fact that we're going for the full game of having it in
libsolid, which
2010/3/30 Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org:
On Sunday 21 March 2010 16:15:46 Nikhil Marathe wrote:
I would really love to participate in GSoC and get KDE to have
seamless UPnP support and allow
Amarok to treat the network as a great collection. I have been working
on understanding the UPnP
stuff
Hello all,
On Wed, March 31, 2010 10:54 am, Bart Cerneels wrote:
2010/3/30 Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org:
On Sunday 21 March 2010 16:15:46 Nikhil Marathe wrote:
I would really love to participate in GSoC and get KDE to have
seamless UPnP support and allow
Amarok to treat the network as a great
hi!
It's unlikely that we will require much more than what Hupnp already
provides, which is a control point, service discovery and action
invocation mechanisms.
I would not say that right away. Although UPnP does seem simple at first
sight there is quite a bit more to it when you want
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 15:02, Armijn Hemel arm...@uulug.nl wrote:
...
Some proposed protocols are just that, proposals. These for instance
don't have an implementation or there is just no interest.
In general, if it's not covered by DLNA don't seriously consider
implementing it.
Internet
On Sunday 21 March 2010 16:15:46 Nikhil Marathe wrote:
I would really love to participate in GSoC and get KDE to have
seamless UPnP support and allow
Amarok to treat the network as a great collection. I have been working
on understanding the UPnP
stuff and using the Hupnp library and a bit of
Samedi, le 27 mars 2010, à 19:30, Nikhil Marathe a écrit:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
kosse...@kde.org wrote:
As for the UPnP spec, I think that Solid should export a generic UPnP
device system,
What do you mean by this? Solid objects which implement a
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
kosse...@kde.org wrote:
Not readable for me:
Error. You need to be in the admin group to read documents in the user
prefix.
socghop isn't working properly right now, so I can't go and change
permissions. Meanwhile please see the
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Bart Cerneels bart.cerne...@kde.org wrote:
Since mediaserver is by far the most used UPnP filesystem like
service I propose we use upnp:// for mediaserver. Other (future) upnp
kio-slaves can use something like upnp-dsc://, etc. Since the
kio-slave feature is
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Will Stephenson wstephen...@kde.org wrote:
Apart from these basic requirements, what upcoming features of HUpnp will you
depend upon and how would it affect your proposal if HUpnp feature development
slows down?
It's unlikely that we will require much more than
Hi Nikhil
I think this looks like a very well thought out proposal.
Unfortunately I cannot really comment on he technical merits as my
knowledge of UPnP is limited at best. We should get Bart to comment on
it, as he is our resident UPnP expert, but it seems he is quite busy
at the moment. I am
Thanks for the feedback everybody!
@Friedrich
I will be investigating the existing infrastructure this Weekend,
though I've already had a glance at it.
As for the UPnP spec, I think that Solid should export a generic UPnP
device system, and perhaps we can have special handlers for some
common
15 matches
Mail list logo
