On Feb. 4, 2014, 5:19 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Any particular reason for not using an abstract class? The D macro makes
the code a bit surprising to read.
see discussion of https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115225/ (comment thread
started by Aaron) - I wanted to keep the same
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115459/
---
(Updated Feb. 5, 2014, 4:46 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
On Feb. 4, 2014, 5:19 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Any particular reason for not using an abstract class? The D macro makes
the code a bit surprising to read.
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
see discussion of https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115225/ (comment
thread started by Aaron) - I
On Feb. 4, 2014, 5:19 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Any particular reason for not using an abstract class? The D macro makes
the code a bit surprising to read.
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
see discussion of https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115225/ (comment
thread started by Aaron) - I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115459/
---
(Updated Feb. 5, 2014, 5:55 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
On Feb. 4, 2014, 5:19 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Any particular reason for not using an abstract class? The D macro makes
the code a bit surprising to read.
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
see discussion of https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115225/ (comment
thread started by Aaron) - I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330824
Christoph Feck christ...@maxiom.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Core|general
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330827
Christoph Feck christ...@maxiom.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christ...@maxiom.de
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115459/#review49088
---
src/kwindowsystem.cpp
On Feb. 6, 2014, 1:14 a.m., Alexander Richardson wrote:
src/kwindowsystem.cpp, line 342
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115459/diff/2-3/?file=242085#file242085line342
The non-MSVC macro has a return statement, I think this one needs it as
well
Why is this conditioned to
On Feb. 6, 2014, 2:14 a.m., Alexander Richardson wrote:
src/kwindowsystem.cpp, line 342
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115459/diff/2-3/?file=242085#file242085line342
The non-MSVC macro has a return statement, I think this one needs it as
well
Andrius da Costa Ribas wrote:
11 matches
Mail list logo